Cargando…

Modeling and predicting optimal treatment scheduling between the antiangiogenic drug sunitinib and irinotecan in preclinical settings

We present a system of nonlinear ordinary differential equations used to quantify the complex dynamics of the interactions between tumor growth, vasculature generation, and antiangiogenic treatment. The primary dataset consists of longitudinal tumor size measurements (1,371 total observations) in 10...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, S, Tod, M, Ouerdani, A, Emde, A, Yarden, Y, Adda Berkane, A, Kassour, S, Wei, MX, Freyer, G, You, B, Grenier, E, Ribba, B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4759705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26904386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12045
_version_ 1782416770159607808
author Wilson, S
Tod, M
Ouerdani, A
Emde, A
Yarden, Y
Adda Berkane, A
Kassour, S
Wei, MX
Freyer, G
You, B
Grenier, E
Ribba, B
author_facet Wilson, S
Tod, M
Ouerdani, A
Emde, A
Yarden, Y
Adda Berkane, A
Kassour, S
Wei, MX
Freyer, G
You, B
Grenier, E
Ribba, B
author_sort Wilson, S
collection PubMed
description We present a system of nonlinear ordinary differential equations used to quantify the complex dynamics of the interactions between tumor growth, vasculature generation, and antiangiogenic treatment. The primary dataset consists of longitudinal tumor size measurements (1,371 total observations) in 105 colorectal tumor‐bearing mice. Mice received single or combination administration of sunitinib, an antiangiogenic agent, and/or irinotecan, a cytotoxic agent. Depending on the dataset, parameter estimation was performed either using a mixed‐effect approach or by nonlinear least squares. Through a log‐likelihood ratio test, we conclude that there is a potential synergistic interaction between sunitinib when administered in combination with irinotecan in preclinical settings. Model simulations were then compared to data from a follow‐up preclinical experiment. We conclude that the model has predictive value in identifying the therapeutic window in which the timing between the administrations of these two drugs is most effective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4759705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47597052016-02-22 Modeling and predicting optimal treatment scheduling between the antiangiogenic drug sunitinib and irinotecan in preclinical settings Wilson, S Tod, M Ouerdani, A Emde, A Yarden, Y Adda Berkane, A Kassour, S Wei, MX Freyer, G You, B Grenier, E Ribba, B CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol Original Articles We present a system of nonlinear ordinary differential equations used to quantify the complex dynamics of the interactions between tumor growth, vasculature generation, and antiangiogenic treatment. The primary dataset consists of longitudinal tumor size measurements (1,371 total observations) in 105 colorectal tumor‐bearing mice. Mice received single or combination administration of sunitinib, an antiangiogenic agent, and/or irinotecan, a cytotoxic agent. Depending on the dataset, parameter estimation was performed either using a mixed‐effect approach or by nonlinear least squares. Through a log‐likelihood ratio test, we conclude that there is a potential synergistic interaction between sunitinib when administered in combination with irinotecan in preclinical settings. Model simulations were then compared to data from a follow‐up preclinical experiment. We conclude that the model has predictive value in identifying the therapeutic window in which the timing between the administrations of these two drugs is most effective. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-12-11 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4759705/ /pubmed/26904386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12045 Text en © 2015 The Authors CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Wilson, S
Tod, M
Ouerdani, A
Emde, A
Yarden, Y
Adda Berkane, A
Kassour, S
Wei, MX
Freyer, G
You, B
Grenier, E
Ribba, B
Modeling and predicting optimal treatment scheduling between the antiangiogenic drug sunitinib and irinotecan in preclinical settings
title Modeling and predicting optimal treatment scheduling between the antiangiogenic drug sunitinib and irinotecan in preclinical settings
title_full Modeling and predicting optimal treatment scheduling between the antiangiogenic drug sunitinib and irinotecan in preclinical settings
title_fullStr Modeling and predicting optimal treatment scheduling between the antiangiogenic drug sunitinib and irinotecan in preclinical settings
title_full_unstemmed Modeling and predicting optimal treatment scheduling between the antiangiogenic drug sunitinib and irinotecan in preclinical settings
title_short Modeling and predicting optimal treatment scheduling between the antiangiogenic drug sunitinib and irinotecan in preclinical settings
title_sort modeling and predicting optimal treatment scheduling between the antiangiogenic drug sunitinib and irinotecan in preclinical settings
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4759705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26904386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12045
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsons modelingandpredictingoptimaltreatmentschedulingbetweentheantiangiogenicdrugsunitinibandirinotecaninpreclinicalsettings
AT todm modelingandpredictingoptimaltreatmentschedulingbetweentheantiangiogenicdrugsunitinibandirinotecaninpreclinicalsettings
AT ouerdania modelingandpredictingoptimaltreatmentschedulingbetweentheantiangiogenicdrugsunitinibandirinotecaninpreclinicalsettings
AT emdea modelingandpredictingoptimaltreatmentschedulingbetweentheantiangiogenicdrugsunitinibandirinotecaninpreclinicalsettings
AT yardeny modelingandpredictingoptimaltreatmentschedulingbetweentheantiangiogenicdrugsunitinibandirinotecaninpreclinicalsettings
AT addaberkanea modelingandpredictingoptimaltreatmentschedulingbetweentheantiangiogenicdrugsunitinibandirinotecaninpreclinicalsettings
AT kassours modelingandpredictingoptimaltreatmentschedulingbetweentheantiangiogenicdrugsunitinibandirinotecaninpreclinicalsettings
AT weimx modelingandpredictingoptimaltreatmentschedulingbetweentheantiangiogenicdrugsunitinibandirinotecaninpreclinicalsettings
AT freyerg modelingandpredictingoptimaltreatmentschedulingbetweentheantiangiogenicdrugsunitinibandirinotecaninpreclinicalsettings
AT youb modelingandpredictingoptimaltreatmentschedulingbetweentheantiangiogenicdrugsunitinibandirinotecaninpreclinicalsettings
AT greniere modelingandpredictingoptimaltreatmentschedulingbetweentheantiangiogenicdrugsunitinibandirinotecaninpreclinicalsettings
AT ribbab modelingandpredictingoptimaltreatmentschedulingbetweentheantiangiogenicdrugsunitinibandirinotecaninpreclinicalsettings