Cargando…

Comparison of fecal pooling methods and DNA extraction kits for the detection of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis

The aim of the study was to develop a sensitive method using quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) with pooled fecal samples for the screening of Johne's disease (JD). Manufacturer‐specified and our new pooling method in combination with five commercial kits for DNA extraction...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mita, Akiko, Mori, Yasuyuki, Nakagawa, Tetsuo, Tasaki, Tomoko, Utiyama, Katsuo, Mori, Hitomi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4767428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26666871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.318
_version_ 1782417811723780096
author Mita, Akiko
Mori, Yasuyuki
Nakagawa, Tetsuo
Tasaki, Tomoko
Utiyama, Katsuo
Mori, Hitomi
author_facet Mita, Akiko
Mori, Yasuyuki
Nakagawa, Tetsuo
Tasaki, Tomoko
Utiyama, Katsuo
Mori, Hitomi
author_sort Mita, Akiko
collection PubMed
description The aim of the study was to develop a sensitive method using quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) with pooled fecal samples for the screening of Johne's disease (JD). Manufacturer‐specified and our new pooling method in combination with five commercial kits for DNA extraction and purification were compared. Different volumes of pooled fecal suspensions were tested, and the results were compared for individual samples and three pool sizes (5, 10, and 50 samples); each of the fecal suspensions, which were prepared from healthy dairy and beef cattle was spiked with 0, 10, 100, or 1000 cultured Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP) organisms or was mixed with fecal suspensions from experimentally infected cattle. The MAP DNA detection proportion with our pooling method in combination with Johne‐Spin kit (Fasmac, Japan) was 100% for all models and all pool sizes, except for the low shedder model with a pool size of 50. There was no loss of sensitivity in pools of 10 subjects or less by using the new method. These results suggest that new method is a sensitive, practical, and cost‐effective screening test for the detection of MAP‐infected cattle and the monitoring of JD‐free herds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4767428
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47674282016-03-07 Comparison of fecal pooling methods and DNA extraction kits for the detection of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis Mita, Akiko Mori, Yasuyuki Nakagawa, Tetsuo Tasaki, Tomoko Utiyama, Katsuo Mori, Hitomi Microbiologyopen Original Research The aim of the study was to develop a sensitive method using quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) with pooled fecal samples for the screening of Johne's disease (JD). Manufacturer‐specified and our new pooling method in combination with five commercial kits for DNA extraction and purification were compared. Different volumes of pooled fecal suspensions were tested, and the results were compared for individual samples and three pool sizes (5, 10, and 50 samples); each of the fecal suspensions, which were prepared from healthy dairy and beef cattle was spiked with 0, 10, 100, or 1000 cultured Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP) organisms or was mixed with fecal suspensions from experimentally infected cattle. The MAP DNA detection proportion with our pooling method in combination with Johne‐Spin kit (Fasmac, Japan) was 100% for all models and all pool sizes, except for the low shedder model with a pool size of 50. There was no loss of sensitivity in pools of 10 subjects or less by using the new method. These results suggest that new method is a sensitive, practical, and cost‐effective screening test for the detection of MAP‐infected cattle and the monitoring of JD‐free herds. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4767428/ /pubmed/26666871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.318 Text en © 2015 The Authors. MicrobiologyOpen published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Mita, Akiko
Mori, Yasuyuki
Nakagawa, Tetsuo
Tasaki, Tomoko
Utiyama, Katsuo
Mori, Hitomi
Comparison of fecal pooling methods and DNA extraction kits for the detection of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis
title Comparison of fecal pooling methods and DNA extraction kits for the detection of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis
title_full Comparison of fecal pooling methods and DNA extraction kits for the detection of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis
title_fullStr Comparison of fecal pooling methods and DNA extraction kits for the detection of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of fecal pooling methods and DNA extraction kits for the detection of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis
title_short Comparison of fecal pooling methods and DNA extraction kits for the detection of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis
title_sort comparison of fecal pooling methods and dna extraction kits for the detection of mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4767428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26666871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.318
work_keys_str_mv AT mitaakiko comparisonoffecalpoolingmethodsanddnaextractionkitsforthedetectionofmycobacteriumaviumsubspeciesparatuberculosis
AT moriyasuyuki comparisonoffecalpoolingmethodsanddnaextractionkitsforthedetectionofmycobacteriumaviumsubspeciesparatuberculosis
AT nakagawatetsuo comparisonoffecalpoolingmethodsanddnaextractionkitsforthedetectionofmycobacteriumaviumsubspeciesparatuberculosis
AT tasakitomoko comparisonoffecalpoolingmethodsanddnaextractionkitsforthedetectionofmycobacteriumaviumsubspeciesparatuberculosis
AT utiyamakatsuo comparisonoffecalpoolingmethodsanddnaextractionkitsforthedetectionofmycobacteriumaviumsubspeciesparatuberculosis
AT morihitomi comparisonoffecalpoolingmethodsanddnaextractionkitsforthedetectionofmycobacteriumaviumsubspeciesparatuberculosis