Cargando…

Performance of Different Analytical Software Packages in Quantification of DNA Methylation by Pyrosequencing

BACKGROUND: Pyrosequencing has emerged as an alternative method of nucleic acid sequencing, well suited for many applications which aim to characterize single nucleotide polymorphisms, mutations, microbial types and CpG methylation in the target DNA. The commercially available pyrosequencing systems...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grasso, Chiara, Trevisan, Morena, Fiano, Valentina, Tarallo, Valentina, De Marco, Laura, Sacerdote, Carlotta, Richiardi, Lorenzo, Merletti, Franco, Gillio-Tos, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4775062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26934703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150483
_version_ 1782419018642096128
author Grasso, Chiara
Trevisan, Morena
Fiano, Valentina
Tarallo, Valentina
De Marco, Laura
Sacerdote, Carlotta
Richiardi, Lorenzo
Merletti, Franco
Gillio-Tos, Anna
author_facet Grasso, Chiara
Trevisan, Morena
Fiano, Valentina
Tarallo, Valentina
De Marco, Laura
Sacerdote, Carlotta
Richiardi, Lorenzo
Merletti, Franco
Gillio-Tos, Anna
author_sort Grasso, Chiara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pyrosequencing has emerged as an alternative method of nucleic acid sequencing, well suited for many applications which aim to characterize single nucleotide polymorphisms, mutations, microbial types and CpG methylation in the target DNA. The commercially available pyrosequencing systems can harbor two different types of software which allow analysis in AQ or CpG mode, respectively, both widely employed for DNA methylation analysis. OBJECTIVE: Aim of the study was to assess the performance for DNA methylation analysis at CpG sites of the two pyrosequencing software which allow analysis in AQ or CpG mode, respectively. Despite CpG mode having been specifically generated for CpG methylation quantification, many investigations on this topic have been carried out with AQ mode. As proof of equivalent performance of the two software for this type of analysis is not available, the focus of this paper was to evaluate if the two modes currently used for CpG methylation assessment by pyrosequencing may give overlapping results. METHODS: We compared the performance of the two software in quantifying DNA methylation in the promoter of selected genes (GSTP1, MGMT, LINE-1) by testing two case series which include DNA from paraffin embedded prostate cancer tissues (PC study, N = 36) and DNA from blood fractions of healthy people (DD study, N = 28), respectively. RESULTS: We found discrepancy in the two pyrosequencing software-based quality assignment of DNA methylation assays. Compared to the software for analysis in the AQ mode, less permissive criteria are supported by the Pyro Q-CpG software, which enables analysis in CpG mode. CpG mode warns the operators about potential unsatisfactory performance of the assay and ensures a more accurate quantitative evaluation of DNA methylation at CpG sites. CONCLUSION: The implementation of CpG mode is strongly advisable in order to improve the reliability of the methylation analysis results achievable by pyrosequencing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4775062
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47750622016-03-10 Performance of Different Analytical Software Packages in Quantification of DNA Methylation by Pyrosequencing Grasso, Chiara Trevisan, Morena Fiano, Valentina Tarallo, Valentina De Marco, Laura Sacerdote, Carlotta Richiardi, Lorenzo Merletti, Franco Gillio-Tos, Anna PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Pyrosequencing has emerged as an alternative method of nucleic acid sequencing, well suited for many applications which aim to characterize single nucleotide polymorphisms, mutations, microbial types and CpG methylation in the target DNA. The commercially available pyrosequencing systems can harbor two different types of software which allow analysis in AQ or CpG mode, respectively, both widely employed for DNA methylation analysis. OBJECTIVE: Aim of the study was to assess the performance for DNA methylation analysis at CpG sites of the two pyrosequencing software which allow analysis in AQ or CpG mode, respectively. Despite CpG mode having been specifically generated for CpG methylation quantification, many investigations on this topic have been carried out with AQ mode. As proof of equivalent performance of the two software for this type of analysis is not available, the focus of this paper was to evaluate if the two modes currently used for CpG methylation assessment by pyrosequencing may give overlapping results. METHODS: We compared the performance of the two software in quantifying DNA methylation in the promoter of selected genes (GSTP1, MGMT, LINE-1) by testing two case series which include DNA from paraffin embedded prostate cancer tissues (PC study, N = 36) and DNA from blood fractions of healthy people (DD study, N = 28), respectively. RESULTS: We found discrepancy in the two pyrosequencing software-based quality assignment of DNA methylation assays. Compared to the software for analysis in the AQ mode, less permissive criteria are supported by the Pyro Q-CpG software, which enables analysis in CpG mode. CpG mode warns the operators about potential unsatisfactory performance of the assay and ensures a more accurate quantitative evaluation of DNA methylation at CpG sites. CONCLUSION: The implementation of CpG mode is strongly advisable in order to improve the reliability of the methylation analysis results achievable by pyrosequencing. Public Library of Science 2016-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4775062/ /pubmed/26934703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150483 Text en © 2016 Grasso et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Grasso, Chiara
Trevisan, Morena
Fiano, Valentina
Tarallo, Valentina
De Marco, Laura
Sacerdote, Carlotta
Richiardi, Lorenzo
Merletti, Franco
Gillio-Tos, Anna
Performance of Different Analytical Software Packages in Quantification of DNA Methylation by Pyrosequencing
title Performance of Different Analytical Software Packages in Quantification of DNA Methylation by Pyrosequencing
title_full Performance of Different Analytical Software Packages in Quantification of DNA Methylation by Pyrosequencing
title_fullStr Performance of Different Analytical Software Packages in Quantification of DNA Methylation by Pyrosequencing
title_full_unstemmed Performance of Different Analytical Software Packages in Quantification of DNA Methylation by Pyrosequencing
title_short Performance of Different Analytical Software Packages in Quantification of DNA Methylation by Pyrosequencing
title_sort performance of different analytical software packages in quantification of dna methylation by pyrosequencing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4775062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26934703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150483
work_keys_str_mv AT grassochiara performanceofdifferentanalyticalsoftwarepackagesinquantificationofdnamethylationbypyrosequencing
AT trevisanmorena performanceofdifferentanalyticalsoftwarepackagesinquantificationofdnamethylationbypyrosequencing
AT fianovalentina performanceofdifferentanalyticalsoftwarepackagesinquantificationofdnamethylationbypyrosequencing
AT tarallovalentina performanceofdifferentanalyticalsoftwarepackagesinquantificationofdnamethylationbypyrosequencing
AT demarcolaura performanceofdifferentanalyticalsoftwarepackagesinquantificationofdnamethylationbypyrosequencing
AT sacerdotecarlotta performanceofdifferentanalyticalsoftwarepackagesinquantificationofdnamethylationbypyrosequencing
AT richiardilorenzo performanceofdifferentanalyticalsoftwarepackagesinquantificationofdnamethylationbypyrosequencing
AT merlettifranco performanceofdifferentanalyticalsoftwarepackagesinquantificationofdnamethylationbypyrosequencing
AT gilliotosanna performanceofdifferentanalyticalsoftwarepackagesinquantificationofdnamethylationbypyrosequencing