Cargando…
Indexed PCR Primers Induce Template-Specific Bias in Large-Scale DNA Sequencing Studies
Massively parallel sequencing is rapidly emerging as an efficient way to quantify biodiversity at all levels, from genetic variation and expression to ecological community assemblage. However, the number of reads produced per sequencing run far exceeds the number required per sample for many applica...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4780811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26950069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148698 |
_version_ | 1782419813907300352 |
---|---|
author | O’Donnell, James L. Kelly, Ryan P. Lowell, Natalie C. Port, Jesse A. |
author_facet | O’Donnell, James L. Kelly, Ryan P. Lowell, Natalie C. Port, Jesse A. |
author_sort | O’Donnell, James L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Massively parallel sequencing is rapidly emerging as an efficient way to quantify biodiversity at all levels, from genetic variation and expression to ecological community assemblage. However, the number of reads produced per sequencing run far exceeds the number required per sample for many applications, compelling researchers to sequence multiple samples per run in order to maximize efficiency. For studies that include a PCR step, this can be accomplished using primers that include an index sequence allowing sample origin to be determined after sequencing. The use of indexed primers assumes they behave no differently than standard primers; however, we found that indexed primers cause substantial template sequence-specific bias, resulting in radically different profiles of the same environmental sample. Likely the outcome of differential amplification efficiency due to primer-template mismatch, two indexed primer sets spuriously change the inferred sequence abundance from the same DNA extraction by up to 77.1%. We demonstrate that a double PCR approach alleviates these effects in applications where indexed primers are necessary. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4780811 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47808112016-03-23 Indexed PCR Primers Induce Template-Specific Bias in Large-Scale DNA Sequencing Studies O’Donnell, James L. Kelly, Ryan P. Lowell, Natalie C. Port, Jesse A. PLoS One Research Article Massively parallel sequencing is rapidly emerging as an efficient way to quantify biodiversity at all levels, from genetic variation and expression to ecological community assemblage. However, the number of reads produced per sequencing run far exceeds the number required per sample for many applications, compelling researchers to sequence multiple samples per run in order to maximize efficiency. For studies that include a PCR step, this can be accomplished using primers that include an index sequence allowing sample origin to be determined after sequencing. The use of indexed primers assumes they behave no differently than standard primers; however, we found that indexed primers cause substantial template sequence-specific bias, resulting in radically different profiles of the same environmental sample. Likely the outcome of differential amplification efficiency due to primer-template mismatch, two indexed primer sets spuriously change the inferred sequence abundance from the same DNA extraction by up to 77.1%. We demonstrate that a double PCR approach alleviates these effects in applications where indexed primers are necessary. Public Library of Science 2016-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4780811/ /pubmed/26950069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148698 Text en © 2016 O’Donnell et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article O’Donnell, James L. Kelly, Ryan P. Lowell, Natalie C. Port, Jesse A. Indexed PCR Primers Induce Template-Specific Bias in Large-Scale DNA Sequencing Studies |
title | Indexed PCR Primers Induce Template-Specific Bias in Large-Scale DNA Sequencing Studies |
title_full | Indexed PCR Primers Induce Template-Specific Bias in Large-Scale DNA Sequencing Studies |
title_fullStr | Indexed PCR Primers Induce Template-Specific Bias in Large-Scale DNA Sequencing Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Indexed PCR Primers Induce Template-Specific Bias in Large-Scale DNA Sequencing Studies |
title_short | Indexed PCR Primers Induce Template-Specific Bias in Large-Scale DNA Sequencing Studies |
title_sort | indexed pcr primers induce template-specific bias in large-scale dna sequencing studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4780811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26950069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148698 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT odonnelljamesl indexedpcrprimersinducetemplatespecificbiasinlargescalednasequencingstudies AT kellyryanp indexedpcrprimersinducetemplatespecificbiasinlargescalednasequencingstudies AT lowellnataliec indexedpcrprimersinducetemplatespecificbiasinlargescalednasequencingstudies AT portjessea indexedpcrprimersinducetemplatespecificbiasinlargescalednasequencingstudies |