Cargando…

Single-cell differences in matrix gene expression do not predict matrix deposition

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) display substantial cell-to-cell heterogeneity, complicating their use in regenerative medicine. However, conventional bulk assays mask this variability. Here we show that both chondrocytes and chondrogenically induced MSCs exhibit substantial mRNA expression heterogene...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cote, Allison J., McLeod, Claire M., Farrell, Megan J., McClanahan, Patrick D., Dunagin, Margaret C., Raj, Arjun, Mauck, Robert L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4782061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26936319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10865
_version_ 1782419887111536640
author Cote, Allison J.
McLeod, Claire M.
Farrell, Megan J.
McClanahan, Patrick D.
Dunagin, Margaret C.
Raj, Arjun
Mauck, Robert L.
author_facet Cote, Allison J.
McLeod, Claire M.
Farrell, Megan J.
McClanahan, Patrick D.
Dunagin, Margaret C.
Raj, Arjun
Mauck, Robert L.
author_sort Cote, Allison J.
collection PubMed
description Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) display substantial cell-to-cell heterogeneity, complicating their use in regenerative medicine. However, conventional bulk assays mask this variability. Here we show that both chondrocytes and chondrogenically induced MSCs exhibit substantial mRNA expression heterogeneity. Single-molecule RNA FISH to measure mRNA expression of differentiation markers in single cells reveals that sister cell pairs have high levels of mRNA variability, suggesting that marker expression is not heritable. Surprisingly, this variability does not correlate with cell-to-cell differences in cartilage-like matrix production. Transcriptome-wide analysis suggests that no combination of markers can predict functional potential. De-differentiating chondrocytes also show a disconnect between mRNA expression of the cartilage marker aggrecan and cartilage-like matrix accumulation. Altogether, these quantitative analyses suggest that sorting subpopulations based on these markers would only marginally enrich the progenitor population for ‘superior' MSCs. Our results suggest that instantaneous mRNA abundance of canonical markers is tenuously linked to the chondrogenic phenotype at the single-cell level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4782061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47820612016-03-15 Single-cell differences in matrix gene expression do not predict matrix deposition Cote, Allison J. McLeod, Claire M. Farrell, Megan J. McClanahan, Patrick D. Dunagin, Margaret C. Raj, Arjun Mauck, Robert L. Nat Commun Article Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) display substantial cell-to-cell heterogeneity, complicating their use in regenerative medicine. However, conventional bulk assays mask this variability. Here we show that both chondrocytes and chondrogenically induced MSCs exhibit substantial mRNA expression heterogeneity. Single-molecule RNA FISH to measure mRNA expression of differentiation markers in single cells reveals that sister cell pairs have high levels of mRNA variability, suggesting that marker expression is not heritable. Surprisingly, this variability does not correlate with cell-to-cell differences in cartilage-like matrix production. Transcriptome-wide analysis suggests that no combination of markers can predict functional potential. De-differentiating chondrocytes also show a disconnect between mRNA expression of the cartilage marker aggrecan and cartilage-like matrix accumulation. Altogether, these quantitative analyses suggest that sorting subpopulations based on these markers would only marginally enrich the progenitor population for ‘superior' MSCs. Our results suggest that instantaneous mRNA abundance of canonical markers is tenuously linked to the chondrogenic phenotype at the single-cell level. Nature Publishing Group 2016-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4782061/ /pubmed/26936319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10865 Text en Copyright © 2016, Nature Publishing Group, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited. All Rights Reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Cote, Allison J.
McLeod, Claire M.
Farrell, Megan J.
McClanahan, Patrick D.
Dunagin, Margaret C.
Raj, Arjun
Mauck, Robert L.
Single-cell differences in matrix gene expression do not predict matrix deposition
title Single-cell differences in matrix gene expression do not predict matrix deposition
title_full Single-cell differences in matrix gene expression do not predict matrix deposition
title_fullStr Single-cell differences in matrix gene expression do not predict matrix deposition
title_full_unstemmed Single-cell differences in matrix gene expression do not predict matrix deposition
title_short Single-cell differences in matrix gene expression do not predict matrix deposition
title_sort single-cell differences in matrix gene expression do not predict matrix deposition
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4782061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26936319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10865
work_keys_str_mv AT coteallisonj singlecelldifferencesinmatrixgeneexpressiondonotpredictmatrixdeposition
AT mcleodclairem singlecelldifferencesinmatrixgeneexpressiondonotpredictmatrixdeposition
AT farrellmeganj singlecelldifferencesinmatrixgeneexpressiondonotpredictmatrixdeposition
AT mcclanahanpatrickd singlecelldifferencesinmatrixgeneexpressiondonotpredictmatrixdeposition
AT dunaginmargaretc singlecelldifferencesinmatrixgeneexpressiondonotpredictmatrixdeposition
AT rajarjun singlecelldifferencesinmatrixgeneexpressiondonotpredictmatrixdeposition
AT mauckrobertl singlecelldifferencesinmatrixgeneexpressiondonotpredictmatrixdeposition