Cargando…

The predictive validity of a situational judgement test and multiple-mini interview for entry into postgraduate training in Australia

BACKGROUND: Evidence for the predictive validity of situational judgement tests (SJTs) and multiple-mini interviews (MMIs) is well-established in undergraduate selection contexts, however at present there is less evidence to support the validity of their use in postgraduate settings. More research i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patterson, Fiona, Rowett, Emma, Hale, Robert, Grant, Marcia, Roberts, Chris, Cousans, Fran, Martin, Stuart
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4784338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26957002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0606-4
_version_ 1782420247541710848
author Patterson, Fiona
Rowett, Emma
Hale, Robert
Grant, Marcia
Roberts, Chris
Cousans, Fran
Martin, Stuart
author_facet Patterson, Fiona
Rowett, Emma
Hale, Robert
Grant, Marcia
Roberts, Chris
Cousans, Fran
Martin, Stuart
author_sort Patterson, Fiona
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence for the predictive validity of situational judgement tests (SJTs) and multiple-mini interviews (MMIs) is well-established in undergraduate selection contexts, however at present there is less evidence to support the validity of their use in postgraduate settings. More research is also required to assess the extent to which SJTs and MMIs are complementary for predicting performance in practice. This study represents the first longitudinal evaluation of the complementary roles and predictive validity of an SJT and an MMI for selection for entry into postgraduate General Practice (GP) specialty training in Australia. METHODS: Longitudinal data was collected from 443 GP registrars in Australia who were selected into GP training in 2010 or 2011. All 17 Regional Training Providers in Australia were asked to participate; performance data were received from 13 of these. Data was collected for participants’ end-of-training assessment performance. Outcome measures include GP registrars’ performance on the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) applied knowledge test, key feature problems and an objective structured clinical exam. RESULTS: Performance on the SJT, MMI and the overall selection score significantly predicted all three end-of-training assessments (r = .12 to .54), indicating that both of the selection methods, as well the overall selection score, have good predictive validity. The SJT and MMI provide incremental validity over each other for two of the three end-of-training assessments. CONCLUSIONS: The SJT and MMI were both significant positive predictors of all end-of-training assessments. Results provide evidence that they are complementary in predicting end-of-training assessment scores. This research adds to the limited literature at present regarding the predictive validity of postgraduate medical selection methods, and their comparable effectiveness when used in a single selection system. A future research agenda is proposed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4784338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47843382016-03-10 The predictive validity of a situational judgement test and multiple-mini interview for entry into postgraduate training in Australia Patterson, Fiona Rowett, Emma Hale, Robert Grant, Marcia Roberts, Chris Cousans, Fran Martin, Stuart BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Evidence for the predictive validity of situational judgement tests (SJTs) and multiple-mini interviews (MMIs) is well-established in undergraduate selection contexts, however at present there is less evidence to support the validity of their use in postgraduate settings. More research is also required to assess the extent to which SJTs and MMIs are complementary for predicting performance in practice. This study represents the first longitudinal evaluation of the complementary roles and predictive validity of an SJT and an MMI for selection for entry into postgraduate General Practice (GP) specialty training in Australia. METHODS: Longitudinal data was collected from 443 GP registrars in Australia who were selected into GP training in 2010 or 2011. All 17 Regional Training Providers in Australia were asked to participate; performance data were received from 13 of these. Data was collected for participants’ end-of-training assessment performance. Outcome measures include GP registrars’ performance on the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) applied knowledge test, key feature problems and an objective structured clinical exam. RESULTS: Performance on the SJT, MMI and the overall selection score significantly predicted all three end-of-training assessments (r = .12 to .54), indicating that both of the selection methods, as well the overall selection score, have good predictive validity. The SJT and MMI provide incremental validity over each other for two of the three end-of-training assessments. CONCLUSIONS: The SJT and MMI were both significant positive predictors of all end-of-training assessments. Results provide evidence that they are complementary in predicting end-of-training assessment scores. This research adds to the limited literature at present regarding the predictive validity of postgraduate medical selection methods, and their comparable effectiveness when used in a single selection system. A future research agenda is proposed. BioMed Central 2016-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4784338/ /pubmed/26957002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0606-4 Text en © Patterson et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Patterson, Fiona
Rowett, Emma
Hale, Robert
Grant, Marcia
Roberts, Chris
Cousans, Fran
Martin, Stuart
The predictive validity of a situational judgement test and multiple-mini interview for entry into postgraduate training in Australia
title The predictive validity of a situational judgement test and multiple-mini interview for entry into postgraduate training in Australia
title_full The predictive validity of a situational judgement test and multiple-mini interview for entry into postgraduate training in Australia
title_fullStr The predictive validity of a situational judgement test and multiple-mini interview for entry into postgraduate training in Australia
title_full_unstemmed The predictive validity of a situational judgement test and multiple-mini interview for entry into postgraduate training in Australia
title_short The predictive validity of a situational judgement test and multiple-mini interview for entry into postgraduate training in Australia
title_sort predictive validity of a situational judgement test and multiple-mini interview for entry into postgraduate training in australia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4784338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26957002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0606-4
work_keys_str_mv AT pattersonfiona thepredictivevalidityofasituationaljudgementtestandmultipleminiinterviewforentryintopostgraduatetraininginaustralia
AT rowettemma thepredictivevalidityofasituationaljudgementtestandmultipleminiinterviewforentryintopostgraduatetraininginaustralia
AT halerobert thepredictivevalidityofasituationaljudgementtestandmultipleminiinterviewforentryintopostgraduatetraininginaustralia
AT grantmarcia thepredictivevalidityofasituationaljudgementtestandmultipleminiinterviewforentryintopostgraduatetraininginaustralia
AT robertschris thepredictivevalidityofasituationaljudgementtestandmultipleminiinterviewforentryintopostgraduatetraininginaustralia
AT cousansfran thepredictivevalidityofasituationaljudgementtestandmultipleminiinterviewforentryintopostgraduatetraininginaustralia
AT martinstuart thepredictivevalidityofasituationaljudgementtestandmultipleminiinterviewforentryintopostgraduatetraininginaustralia
AT pattersonfiona predictivevalidityofasituationaljudgementtestandmultipleminiinterviewforentryintopostgraduatetraininginaustralia
AT rowettemma predictivevalidityofasituationaljudgementtestandmultipleminiinterviewforentryintopostgraduatetraininginaustralia
AT halerobert predictivevalidityofasituationaljudgementtestandmultipleminiinterviewforentryintopostgraduatetraininginaustralia
AT grantmarcia predictivevalidityofasituationaljudgementtestandmultipleminiinterviewforentryintopostgraduatetraininginaustralia
AT robertschris predictivevalidityofasituationaljudgementtestandmultipleminiinterviewforentryintopostgraduatetraininginaustralia
AT cousansfran predictivevalidityofasituationaljudgementtestandmultipleminiinterviewforentryintopostgraduatetraininginaustralia
AT martinstuart predictivevalidityofasituationaljudgementtestandmultipleminiinterviewforentryintopostgraduatetraininginaustralia