How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A cross-sectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors

OBJECTIVES: To study whether systematic reviewers apply procedures to counter-balance some common forms of research malpractice such as not publishing completed research, duplicate publications, or selective reporting of outcomes, and to see whether they identify and report misconduct. DESIGN: Cross...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elia, Nadia, von Elm, Erik, Chatagner, Alexandra, Pöpping, Daniel M, Tramèr, Martin R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Evidence Based Practice
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4785311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26936908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010442

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4785311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26936908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010442

Ejemplares similares