Cargando…
How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A cross-sectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors
OBJECTIVES: To study whether systematic reviewers apply procedures to counter-balance some common forms of research malpractice such as not publishing completed research, duplicate publications, or selective reporting of outcomes, and to see whether they identify and report misconduct. DESIGN: Cross...
Autores principales: | Elia, Nadia, von Elm, Erik, Chatagner, Alexandra, Pöpping, Daniel M, Tramèr, Martin R |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4785311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26936908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010442 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Evidence-based interventions to reduce adverse events in hospitals: a systematic review of systematic reviews
por: Zegers, Marieke, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Barriers to the uptake of evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a systematic review of decision makers’ perceptions
por: Wallace, John, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Barriers towards organ donor registration and consent among people of Indian origin living globally: a systematic review and integrative synthesis—protocol
por: Vincent, Britzer Paul, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Do guidelines offer implementation advice to target users? A systematic review of guideline applicability
por: Gagliardi, Anna R, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Search for unpublished data by systematic reviewers: an audit
por: Ziai, Hedyeh, et al.
Publicado: (2017)