Cargando…
Systemic versus local responses in melanoma patients treated with talimogene laherparepvec from a multi-institutional phase II study
BACKGROUND: We previously reported that talimogene laherparepvec, an oncolytic herpes virus encoding granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), resulted in an objective response rate of 26 % in patients with advanced melanoma in a phase II clinical trial. The response of individual l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4791835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26981242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-016-0116-2 |
_version_ | 1782421144483135488 |
---|---|
author | Kaufman, Howard L. Amatruda, Thomas Reid, Tony Gonzalez, Rene Glaspy, John Whitman, Eric Harrington, Kevin Nemunaitis, John Zloza, Andrew Wolf, Michael Senzer, Neil N. |
author_facet | Kaufman, Howard L. Amatruda, Thomas Reid, Tony Gonzalez, Rene Glaspy, John Whitman, Eric Harrington, Kevin Nemunaitis, John Zloza, Andrew Wolf, Michael Senzer, Neil N. |
author_sort | Kaufman, Howard L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We previously reported that talimogene laherparepvec, an oncolytic herpes virus encoding granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), resulted in an objective response rate of 26 % in patients with advanced melanoma in a phase II clinical trial. The response of individual lesions, however, was not reported. Since talimogene laherparepvec is thought to mediate anti-tumor activity through both direct tumor cytolysis and induction of systemic tumor-specific immunity, we sought to determine the independent response rate in virus-injected and non-injected lesions. METHODS: Fifty patients with stage IIIC or IV melanoma were treated with talimogene laherparepvec in a multi-institutional single-arm open-label phase II clinical trial. In this study patients were treated until a complete response was achieved, all accessible tumors disappeared, clinically significant disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity. This report is a post hoc analysis of the systemic effects of talimogene laherparepvec in injected lesions and two types of uninjected lesions—non-visceral lesions and visceral lesions. RESULTS: Eleven of 23 patients (47.8 %) had a ≥ 30 % reduction in the total burden of uninjected non-visceral lesions, and 2 of 12 patients (16.7 %) had a ≥ 30 % reduction in the total burden of visceral lesions. Among 128 evaluable lesions directly injected with talimogene laherparepvec, 86 (67.2 %) decreased in size by ≥ 30 % and 59 (46.1 %) completely resolved. Of 146 uninjected non-visceral lesions, 60 (41.1 %) decreased in size by ≥ 30 %, the majority of which (44 [30.1 %]) completely resolved. Of 32 visceral lesions, 4 (12.5 %) decreased in size by ≥ 30 %, and 3 (9.4 %) completely resolved. The median time to lesion response was shortest for lesions that were directly injected (18.4 weeks), followed by uninjected non-visceral lesions (23.1 weeks) and visceral lesions (51.3 weeks), consistent with initiation of a delayed regional and systemic anti-tumor immune response to talimogene laherparepvec. CONCLUSIONS: These results support a regional and systemic effect of talimogene laherparepvec immunotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4791835 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47918352016-03-16 Systemic versus local responses in melanoma patients treated with talimogene laherparepvec from a multi-institutional phase II study Kaufman, Howard L. Amatruda, Thomas Reid, Tony Gonzalez, Rene Glaspy, John Whitman, Eric Harrington, Kevin Nemunaitis, John Zloza, Andrew Wolf, Michael Senzer, Neil N. J Immunother Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: We previously reported that talimogene laherparepvec, an oncolytic herpes virus encoding granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), resulted in an objective response rate of 26 % in patients with advanced melanoma in a phase II clinical trial. The response of individual lesions, however, was not reported. Since talimogene laherparepvec is thought to mediate anti-tumor activity through both direct tumor cytolysis and induction of systemic tumor-specific immunity, we sought to determine the independent response rate in virus-injected and non-injected lesions. METHODS: Fifty patients with stage IIIC or IV melanoma were treated with talimogene laherparepvec in a multi-institutional single-arm open-label phase II clinical trial. In this study patients were treated until a complete response was achieved, all accessible tumors disappeared, clinically significant disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity. This report is a post hoc analysis of the systemic effects of talimogene laherparepvec in injected lesions and two types of uninjected lesions—non-visceral lesions and visceral lesions. RESULTS: Eleven of 23 patients (47.8 %) had a ≥ 30 % reduction in the total burden of uninjected non-visceral lesions, and 2 of 12 patients (16.7 %) had a ≥ 30 % reduction in the total burden of visceral lesions. Among 128 evaluable lesions directly injected with talimogene laherparepvec, 86 (67.2 %) decreased in size by ≥ 30 % and 59 (46.1 %) completely resolved. Of 146 uninjected non-visceral lesions, 60 (41.1 %) decreased in size by ≥ 30 %, the majority of which (44 [30.1 %]) completely resolved. Of 32 visceral lesions, 4 (12.5 %) decreased in size by ≥ 30 %, and 3 (9.4 %) completely resolved. The median time to lesion response was shortest for lesions that were directly injected (18.4 weeks), followed by uninjected non-visceral lesions (23.1 weeks) and visceral lesions (51.3 weeks), consistent with initiation of a delayed regional and systemic anti-tumor immune response to talimogene laherparepvec. CONCLUSIONS: These results support a regional and systemic effect of talimogene laherparepvec immunotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma. BioMed Central 2016-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4791835/ /pubmed/26981242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-016-0116-2 Text en © Kaufman et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kaufman, Howard L. Amatruda, Thomas Reid, Tony Gonzalez, Rene Glaspy, John Whitman, Eric Harrington, Kevin Nemunaitis, John Zloza, Andrew Wolf, Michael Senzer, Neil N. Systemic versus local responses in melanoma patients treated with talimogene laherparepvec from a multi-institutional phase II study |
title | Systemic versus local responses in melanoma patients treated with talimogene laherparepvec from a multi-institutional phase II study |
title_full | Systemic versus local responses in melanoma patients treated with talimogene laherparepvec from a multi-institutional phase II study |
title_fullStr | Systemic versus local responses in melanoma patients treated with talimogene laherparepvec from a multi-institutional phase II study |
title_full_unstemmed | Systemic versus local responses in melanoma patients treated with talimogene laherparepvec from a multi-institutional phase II study |
title_short | Systemic versus local responses in melanoma patients treated with talimogene laherparepvec from a multi-institutional phase II study |
title_sort | systemic versus local responses in melanoma patients treated with talimogene laherparepvec from a multi-institutional phase ii study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4791835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26981242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-016-0116-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaufmanhowardl systemicversuslocalresponsesinmelanomapatientstreatedwithtalimogenelaherparepvecfromamultiinstitutionalphaseiistudy AT amatrudathomas systemicversuslocalresponsesinmelanomapatientstreatedwithtalimogenelaherparepvecfromamultiinstitutionalphaseiistudy AT reidtony systemicversuslocalresponsesinmelanomapatientstreatedwithtalimogenelaherparepvecfromamultiinstitutionalphaseiistudy AT gonzalezrene systemicversuslocalresponsesinmelanomapatientstreatedwithtalimogenelaherparepvecfromamultiinstitutionalphaseiistudy AT glaspyjohn systemicversuslocalresponsesinmelanomapatientstreatedwithtalimogenelaherparepvecfromamultiinstitutionalphaseiistudy AT whitmaneric systemicversuslocalresponsesinmelanomapatientstreatedwithtalimogenelaherparepvecfromamultiinstitutionalphaseiistudy AT harringtonkevin systemicversuslocalresponsesinmelanomapatientstreatedwithtalimogenelaherparepvecfromamultiinstitutionalphaseiistudy AT nemunaitisjohn systemicversuslocalresponsesinmelanomapatientstreatedwithtalimogenelaherparepvecfromamultiinstitutionalphaseiistudy AT zlozaandrew systemicversuslocalresponsesinmelanomapatientstreatedwithtalimogenelaherparepvecfromamultiinstitutionalphaseiistudy AT wolfmichael systemicversuslocalresponsesinmelanomapatientstreatedwithtalimogenelaherparepvecfromamultiinstitutionalphaseiistudy AT senzerneiln systemicversuslocalresponsesinmelanomapatientstreatedwithtalimogenelaherparepvecfromamultiinstitutionalphaseiistudy |