Cargando…

Resistome diversity in cattle and the environment decreases during beef production

Antimicrobial resistant determinants (ARDs) can be transmitted from livestock systems through meat products or environmental effluents. The public health risk posed by these two routes is not well understood, particularly in non-pathogenic bacteria. We collected pooled samples from 8 groups of 1741...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noyes, Noelle R, Yang, Xiang, Linke, Lyndsey M, Magnuson, Roberta J, Dettenwanger, Adam, Cook, Shaun, Geornaras, Ifigenia, Woerner, Dale E, Gow, Sheryl P, McAllister, Tim A, Yang, Hua, Ruiz, Jaime, Jones, Kenneth L, Boucher, Christina A, Morley, Paul S, Belk, Keith E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4798965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26952213
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13195
_version_ 1782422245961891840
author Noyes, Noelle R
Yang, Xiang
Linke, Lyndsey M
Magnuson, Roberta J
Dettenwanger, Adam
Cook, Shaun
Geornaras, Ifigenia
Woerner, Dale E
Gow, Sheryl P
McAllister, Tim A
Yang, Hua
Ruiz, Jaime
Jones, Kenneth L
Boucher, Christina A
Morley, Paul S
Belk, Keith E
author_facet Noyes, Noelle R
Yang, Xiang
Linke, Lyndsey M
Magnuson, Roberta J
Dettenwanger, Adam
Cook, Shaun
Geornaras, Ifigenia
Woerner, Dale E
Gow, Sheryl P
McAllister, Tim A
Yang, Hua
Ruiz, Jaime
Jones, Kenneth L
Boucher, Christina A
Morley, Paul S
Belk, Keith E
author_sort Noyes, Noelle R
collection PubMed
description Antimicrobial resistant determinants (ARDs) can be transmitted from livestock systems through meat products or environmental effluents. The public health risk posed by these two routes is not well understood, particularly in non-pathogenic bacteria. We collected pooled samples from 8 groups of 1741 commercial cattle as they moved through the process of beef production from feedlot entry through slaughter. We recorded antimicrobial drug exposures and interrogated the resistome at points in production when management procedures could potentially influence ARD abundance and/or transmission. Over 300 unique ARDs were identified. Resistome diversity decreased while cattle were in the feedlot, indicating selective pressure. ARDs were not identified in beef products, suggesting that slaughter interventions may reduce the risk of transmission of ARDs to beef consumers. This report highlights the utility and limitations of metagenomics for assessing public health risks regarding antimicrobial resistance, and demonstrates that environmental pathways may represent a greater risk than the food supply. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13195.001
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4798965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47989652016-03-21 Resistome diversity in cattle and the environment decreases during beef production Noyes, Noelle R Yang, Xiang Linke, Lyndsey M Magnuson, Roberta J Dettenwanger, Adam Cook, Shaun Geornaras, Ifigenia Woerner, Dale E Gow, Sheryl P McAllister, Tim A Yang, Hua Ruiz, Jaime Jones, Kenneth L Boucher, Christina A Morley, Paul S Belk, Keith E eLife Epidemiology and Global Health Antimicrobial resistant determinants (ARDs) can be transmitted from livestock systems through meat products or environmental effluents. The public health risk posed by these two routes is not well understood, particularly in non-pathogenic bacteria. We collected pooled samples from 8 groups of 1741 commercial cattle as they moved through the process of beef production from feedlot entry through slaughter. We recorded antimicrobial drug exposures and interrogated the resistome at points in production when management procedures could potentially influence ARD abundance and/or transmission. Over 300 unique ARDs were identified. Resistome diversity decreased while cattle were in the feedlot, indicating selective pressure. ARDs were not identified in beef products, suggesting that slaughter interventions may reduce the risk of transmission of ARDs to beef consumers. This report highlights the utility and limitations of metagenomics for assessing public health risks regarding antimicrobial resistance, and demonstrates that environmental pathways may represent a greater risk than the food supply. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13195.001 eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2016-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4798965/ /pubmed/26952213 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13195 Text en © 2016, Noyes et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Epidemiology and Global Health
Noyes, Noelle R
Yang, Xiang
Linke, Lyndsey M
Magnuson, Roberta J
Dettenwanger, Adam
Cook, Shaun
Geornaras, Ifigenia
Woerner, Dale E
Gow, Sheryl P
McAllister, Tim A
Yang, Hua
Ruiz, Jaime
Jones, Kenneth L
Boucher, Christina A
Morley, Paul S
Belk, Keith E
Resistome diversity in cattle and the environment decreases during beef production
title Resistome diversity in cattle and the environment decreases during beef production
title_full Resistome diversity in cattle and the environment decreases during beef production
title_fullStr Resistome diversity in cattle and the environment decreases during beef production
title_full_unstemmed Resistome diversity in cattle and the environment decreases during beef production
title_short Resistome diversity in cattle and the environment decreases during beef production
title_sort resistome diversity in cattle and the environment decreases during beef production
topic Epidemiology and Global Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4798965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26952213
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13195
work_keys_str_mv AT noyesnoeller resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction
AT yangxiang resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction
AT linkelyndseym resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction
AT magnusonrobertaj resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction
AT dettenwangeradam resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction
AT cookshaun resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction
AT geornarasifigenia resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction
AT woernerdalee resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction
AT gowsherylp resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction
AT mcallistertima resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction
AT yanghua resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction
AT ruizjaime resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction
AT joneskennethl resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction
AT boucherchristinaa resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction
AT morleypauls resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction
AT belkkeithe resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction