Cargando…
Resistome diversity in cattle and the environment decreases during beef production
Antimicrobial resistant determinants (ARDs) can be transmitted from livestock systems through meat products or environmental effluents. The public health risk posed by these two routes is not well understood, particularly in non-pathogenic bacteria. We collected pooled samples from 8 groups of 1741...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4798965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26952213 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13195 |
_version_ | 1782422245961891840 |
---|---|
author | Noyes, Noelle R Yang, Xiang Linke, Lyndsey M Magnuson, Roberta J Dettenwanger, Adam Cook, Shaun Geornaras, Ifigenia Woerner, Dale E Gow, Sheryl P McAllister, Tim A Yang, Hua Ruiz, Jaime Jones, Kenneth L Boucher, Christina A Morley, Paul S Belk, Keith E |
author_facet | Noyes, Noelle R Yang, Xiang Linke, Lyndsey M Magnuson, Roberta J Dettenwanger, Adam Cook, Shaun Geornaras, Ifigenia Woerner, Dale E Gow, Sheryl P McAllister, Tim A Yang, Hua Ruiz, Jaime Jones, Kenneth L Boucher, Christina A Morley, Paul S Belk, Keith E |
author_sort | Noyes, Noelle R |
collection | PubMed |
description | Antimicrobial resistant determinants (ARDs) can be transmitted from livestock systems through meat products or environmental effluents. The public health risk posed by these two routes is not well understood, particularly in non-pathogenic bacteria. We collected pooled samples from 8 groups of 1741 commercial cattle as they moved through the process of beef production from feedlot entry through slaughter. We recorded antimicrobial drug exposures and interrogated the resistome at points in production when management procedures could potentially influence ARD abundance and/or transmission. Over 300 unique ARDs were identified. Resistome diversity decreased while cattle were in the feedlot, indicating selective pressure. ARDs were not identified in beef products, suggesting that slaughter interventions may reduce the risk of transmission of ARDs to beef consumers. This report highlights the utility and limitations of metagenomics for assessing public health risks regarding antimicrobial resistance, and demonstrates that environmental pathways may represent a greater risk than the food supply. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13195.001 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4798965 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47989652016-03-21 Resistome diversity in cattle and the environment decreases during beef production Noyes, Noelle R Yang, Xiang Linke, Lyndsey M Magnuson, Roberta J Dettenwanger, Adam Cook, Shaun Geornaras, Ifigenia Woerner, Dale E Gow, Sheryl P McAllister, Tim A Yang, Hua Ruiz, Jaime Jones, Kenneth L Boucher, Christina A Morley, Paul S Belk, Keith E eLife Epidemiology and Global Health Antimicrobial resistant determinants (ARDs) can be transmitted from livestock systems through meat products or environmental effluents. The public health risk posed by these two routes is not well understood, particularly in non-pathogenic bacteria. We collected pooled samples from 8 groups of 1741 commercial cattle as they moved through the process of beef production from feedlot entry through slaughter. We recorded antimicrobial drug exposures and interrogated the resistome at points in production when management procedures could potentially influence ARD abundance and/or transmission. Over 300 unique ARDs were identified. Resistome diversity decreased while cattle were in the feedlot, indicating selective pressure. ARDs were not identified in beef products, suggesting that slaughter interventions may reduce the risk of transmission of ARDs to beef consumers. This report highlights the utility and limitations of metagenomics for assessing public health risks regarding antimicrobial resistance, and demonstrates that environmental pathways may represent a greater risk than the food supply. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13195.001 eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2016-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4798965/ /pubmed/26952213 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13195 Text en © 2016, Noyes et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology and Global Health Noyes, Noelle R Yang, Xiang Linke, Lyndsey M Magnuson, Roberta J Dettenwanger, Adam Cook, Shaun Geornaras, Ifigenia Woerner, Dale E Gow, Sheryl P McAllister, Tim A Yang, Hua Ruiz, Jaime Jones, Kenneth L Boucher, Christina A Morley, Paul S Belk, Keith E Resistome diversity in cattle and the environment decreases during beef production |
title | Resistome diversity in cattle and the environment decreases during beef production |
title_full | Resistome diversity in cattle and the environment decreases during beef production |
title_fullStr | Resistome diversity in cattle and the environment decreases during beef production |
title_full_unstemmed | Resistome diversity in cattle and the environment decreases during beef production |
title_short | Resistome diversity in cattle and the environment decreases during beef production |
title_sort | resistome diversity in cattle and the environment decreases during beef production |
topic | Epidemiology and Global Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4798965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26952213 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13195 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT noyesnoeller resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction AT yangxiang resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction AT linkelyndseym resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction AT magnusonrobertaj resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction AT dettenwangeradam resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction AT cookshaun resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction AT geornarasifigenia resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction AT woernerdalee resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction AT gowsherylp resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction AT mcallistertima resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction AT yanghua resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction AT ruizjaime resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction AT joneskennethl resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction AT boucherchristinaa resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction AT morleypauls resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction AT belkkeithe resistomediversityincattleandtheenvironmentdecreasesduringbeefproduction |