Cargando…
Beyond the Central Dogma: Model-Based Learning of How Genes Determine Phenotypes
In an introductory biology course, we implemented a learner-centered, model-based pedagogy that frequently engaged students in building conceptual models to explain how genes determine phenotypes. Model-building tasks were incorporated within case studies and aimed at eliciting students’ understandi...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Cell Biology
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4803093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26903496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-04-0105 |
_version_ | 1782422836593295360 |
---|---|
author | Reinagel, Adam Bray Speth, Elena |
author_facet | Reinagel, Adam Bray Speth, Elena |
author_sort | Reinagel, Adam |
collection | PubMed |
description | In an introductory biology course, we implemented a learner-centered, model-based pedagogy that frequently engaged students in building conceptual models to explain how genes determine phenotypes. Model-building tasks were incorporated within case studies and aimed at eliciting students’ understanding of 1) the origin of variation in a population and 2) how genes/alleles determine phenotypes. Guided by theory on hierarchical development of systems-thinking skills, we scaffolded instruction and assessment so that students would first focus on articulating isolated relationships between pairs of molecular genetics structures and then integrate these relationships into an explanatory network. We analyzed models students generated on two exams to assess whether students’ learning of molecular genetics progressed along the theoretical hierarchical sequence of systems-thinking skills acquisition. With repeated practice, peer discussion, and instructor feedback over the course of the semester, students’ models became more accurate, better contextualized, and more meaningful. At the end of the semester, however, more than 25% of students still struggled to describe phenotype as an output of protein function. We therefore recommend that 1) practices like modeling, which require connecting genes to phenotypes; and 2) well-developed case studies highlighting proteins and their functions, take center stage in molecular genetics instruction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4803093 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | American Society for Cell Biology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48030932016-03-29 Beyond the Central Dogma: Model-Based Learning of How Genes Determine Phenotypes Reinagel, Adam Bray Speth, Elena CBE Life Sci Educ Article In an introductory biology course, we implemented a learner-centered, model-based pedagogy that frequently engaged students in building conceptual models to explain how genes determine phenotypes. Model-building tasks were incorporated within case studies and aimed at eliciting students’ understanding of 1) the origin of variation in a population and 2) how genes/alleles determine phenotypes. Guided by theory on hierarchical development of systems-thinking skills, we scaffolded instruction and assessment so that students would first focus on articulating isolated relationships between pairs of molecular genetics structures and then integrate these relationships into an explanatory network. We analyzed models students generated on two exams to assess whether students’ learning of molecular genetics progressed along the theoretical hierarchical sequence of systems-thinking skills acquisition. With repeated practice, peer discussion, and instructor feedback over the course of the semester, students’ models became more accurate, better contextualized, and more meaningful. At the end of the semester, however, more than 25% of students still struggled to describe phenotype as an output of protein function. We therefore recommend that 1) practices like modeling, which require connecting genes to phenotypes; and 2) well-developed case studies highlighting proteins and their functions, take center stage in molecular genetics instruction. American Society for Cell Biology 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4803093/ /pubmed/26903496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-04-0105 Text en © 2016 A. Reinagel and E. Bray Speth. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2016 The American Society for Cell Biology. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0). “ASCB®”and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology. |
spellingShingle | Article Reinagel, Adam Bray Speth, Elena Beyond the Central Dogma: Model-Based Learning of How Genes Determine Phenotypes |
title | Beyond the Central Dogma: Model-Based Learning of How Genes Determine Phenotypes |
title_full | Beyond the Central Dogma: Model-Based Learning of How Genes Determine Phenotypes |
title_fullStr | Beyond the Central Dogma: Model-Based Learning of How Genes Determine Phenotypes |
title_full_unstemmed | Beyond the Central Dogma: Model-Based Learning of How Genes Determine Phenotypes |
title_short | Beyond the Central Dogma: Model-Based Learning of How Genes Determine Phenotypes |
title_sort | beyond the central dogma: model-based learning of how genes determine phenotypes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4803093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26903496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-04-0105 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reinageladam beyondthecentraldogmamodelbasedlearningofhowgenesdeterminephenotypes AT brayspethelena beyondthecentraldogmamodelbasedlearningofhowgenesdeterminephenotypes |