Cargando…

Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: the design, analysis, and interpretation of Mendelian randomization studies(1)

Mendelian randomization (MR) is an increasingly important tool for appraising causality in observational epidemiology. The technique exploits the principle that genotypes are not generally susceptible to reverse causation bias and confounding, reflecting their fixed nature and Mendel’s first and sec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Haycock, Philip C, Burgess, Stephen, Wade, Kaitlin H, Bowden, Jack, Relton, Caroline, Davey Smith, George
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	American Society for Nutrition 2016
Materias:	Statistical Commentary
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4807699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26961927 http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.115.118216

Ejemplares similares

Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator
por: Bowden, Jack, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The Role of Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes, and Metabolic Factors in Pancreatic Cancer: A Mendelian Randomization Study
por: Carreras-Torres, Robert, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Study designs: Part 1 – An overview and classification
por: Ranganathan, Priya, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Study designs: Part 2 – Descriptive studies
por: Aggarwal, Rakesh, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Study designs: Part 4 – Interventional studies
por: Aggarwal, Rakesh, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Study designs: Part 7 – Systematic reviews
por: Ranganathan, Priya, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Study designs: Part 3 - Analytical observational studies
por: Ranganathan, Priya, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Study designs: Part 5 – Interventional studies (III)
por: Ranganathan, Priya, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Study designs: Part 5 – interventional studies (II)
por: Aggarwal, Rakesh, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Study designs: Part 8 - Meta-analysis (I)
por: Ranganathan, Priya, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Study designs: Part 9 – Meta-analysis (II)
por: Ranganathan, Priya, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Designing and validating a research questionnaire - Part 1
por: Ranganathan, Priya, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Recent Developments in Mendelian Randomization Studies
por: Zheng, Jie, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Data transformation: a focus on the interpretation
por: Lee, Dong Kyu
Publicado: (2020)

Invited Commentary: Detecting Individual and Global Horizontal Pleiotropy in Mendelian Randomization—A Job for the Humble Heterogeneity Statistic?
por: Bowden, Jack, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Predicting outcomes at the individual patient level: what is the best method?
por: Liu, Qiang, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Role of obesity in smoking behaviour: Mendelian randomisation study in UK Biobank
por: Carreras-Torres, Robert, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A Statistical Note on Analyzing and Interpreting Individual-Level Epidemiological Data
por: Yoneoka, Daisuke, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression
por: Bowden, Jack, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Weighing Evidence “Steampunk” Style via the Meta-Analyser
por: Bowden, Jack, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Sample Size Estimation in Clinical Trial
por: Sakpal, Tushar Vijay
Publicado: (2010)

Survival analysis in clinical trials: Basics and must know areas
por: Singh, Ritesh, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Statistics on the distribution of contracts and purchase orders by country for the LHC Project based on payments and outstanding commitments for the period 1 January 1995 to 31 March 2000 (including adjudications by the Finance Committee up to March 2000).
Publicado: (2000)

Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: “P” values, statistical significance and confidence intervals
por: Ranganathan, Priya, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Clinical versus statistical significance
por: Ranganathan, Priya, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Absolute risk reduction, relative risk reduction, and number needed to treat
por: Ranganathan, Priya, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Odds versus risk
por: Ranganathan, Priya, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: The perils of multiple testing
por: Ranganathan, Priya, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

On the challenges of drawing conclusions from p-values just below 0.05
por: Lakens, Daniël
Publicado: (2015)

Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: “No evidence of effect” versus “evidence of no effect”
por: Ranganathan, Priya, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Intention-to-treat versus per-protocol analysis
por: Ranganathan, Priya, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: The use of correlation techniques
por: Aggarwal, Rakesh, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Measures of agreement
por: Ranganathan, Priya, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Understanding the properties of diagnostic tests – Part 1
por: Ranganathan, Priya, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Understanding diagnostic tests – Part 3: Receiver operating characteristic curves
por: Aggarwal, Rakesh, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Spatial-temporal variation and impacts of drought in Xinjiang (Northwest China) during 1961–2015
por: Yao, Junqiang, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Understanding the properties of diagnostic tests – Part 2: Likelihood ratios
por: Ranganathan, Priya, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Measuring the dispersion of rainfall using Bayesian confidence intervals for coefficient of variation of delta-lognormal distribution: a study from Thailand
por: Yosboonruang, Noppadon, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Detecting the impact of land cover change on observed rainfall
por: Liang, Chun Xia, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Splitting on categorical predictors in random forests
por: Wright, Marvin N., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_dtpmcm2943hbavopu4vlpdq6qk