Cargando…

London Education and Inclusion Project (LEIP): Exploring Negative and Null Effects of a Cluster-Randomised School-Intervention to Reduce School Exclusion—Findings from Protocol-Based Subgroup Analyses

This paper presents subgroup analyses from the London Education and Inclusion Project (LEIP). LEIP was a cluster-randomised controlled trial of an intervention called Engage in Education-London (EiE-L) which aimed to reduce school exclusions in those at greatest risk of exclusion. Pupils in the cont...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Obsuth, Ingrid, Cope, Aiden, Sutherland, Alex, Pilbeam, Liv, Murray, Aja Louise, Eisner, Manuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4821581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27045953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152423
_version_ 1782425614185136128
author Obsuth, Ingrid
Cope, Aiden
Sutherland, Alex
Pilbeam, Liv
Murray, Aja Louise
Eisner, Manuel
author_facet Obsuth, Ingrid
Cope, Aiden
Sutherland, Alex
Pilbeam, Liv
Murray, Aja Louise
Eisner, Manuel
author_sort Obsuth, Ingrid
collection PubMed
description This paper presents subgroup analyses from the London Education and Inclusion Project (LEIP). LEIP was a cluster-randomised controlled trial of an intervention called Engage in Education-London (EiE-L) which aimed to reduce school exclusions in those at greatest risk of exclusion. Pupils in the control schools attended an hour-long employability seminar. Minimisation was used to randomly assign schools to treatment and control following baseline data collection. The study involved 36 schools (17 in treatment—373 pupils; 19 in control—369 pupils) with >28% free school meal eligibility across London and utilised on pupil self-reports, teacher reports as well as official records to assess the effectiveness of EiE-L. Due to multiple data sources, sample sizes varied according to analysis. Analyses of pre-specified subgroups revealed null and negative effects on school exclusion following the intervention. Our findings suggest that the design and implementation of EiE-L may have contributed to the negative outcomes for pupils in the treatment schools when compared to those in the control schools. These findings call into question the effectiveness of bolt-on short-term interventions with pupils, particularly those at the highest risk of school exclusion and when they are faced with multiple problems. This is especially pertinent given the possibility of negative outcomes. Trial Registration: Controlled Trials: ISRCTN23244695
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4821581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48215812016-04-22 London Education and Inclusion Project (LEIP): Exploring Negative and Null Effects of a Cluster-Randomised School-Intervention to Reduce School Exclusion—Findings from Protocol-Based Subgroup Analyses Obsuth, Ingrid Cope, Aiden Sutherland, Alex Pilbeam, Liv Murray, Aja Louise Eisner, Manuel PLoS One Research Article This paper presents subgroup analyses from the London Education and Inclusion Project (LEIP). LEIP was a cluster-randomised controlled trial of an intervention called Engage in Education-London (EiE-L) which aimed to reduce school exclusions in those at greatest risk of exclusion. Pupils in the control schools attended an hour-long employability seminar. Minimisation was used to randomly assign schools to treatment and control following baseline data collection. The study involved 36 schools (17 in treatment—373 pupils; 19 in control—369 pupils) with >28% free school meal eligibility across London and utilised on pupil self-reports, teacher reports as well as official records to assess the effectiveness of EiE-L. Due to multiple data sources, sample sizes varied according to analysis. Analyses of pre-specified subgroups revealed null and negative effects on school exclusion following the intervention. Our findings suggest that the design and implementation of EiE-L may have contributed to the negative outcomes for pupils in the treatment schools when compared to those in the control schools. These findings call into question the effectiveness of bolt-on short-term interventions with pupils, particularly those at the highest risk of school exclusion and when they are faced with multiple problems. This is especially pertinent given the possibility of negative outcomes. Trial Registration: Controlled Trials: ISRCTN23244695 Public Library of Science 2016-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4821581/ /pubmed/27045953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152423 Text en © 2016 Obsuth et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Obsuth, Ingrid
Cope, Aiden
Sutherland, Alex
Pilbeam, Liv
Murray, Aja Louise
Eisner, Manuel
London Education and Inclusion Project (LEIP): Exploring Negative and Null Effects of a Cluster-Randomised School-Intervention to Reduce School Exclusion—Findings from Protocol-Based Subgroup Analyses
title London Education and Inclusion Project (LEIP): Exploring Negative and Null Effects of a Cluster-Randomised School-Intervention to Reduce School Exclusion—Findings from Protocol-Based Subgroup Analyses
title_full London Education and Inclusion Project (LEIP): Exploring Negative and Null Effects of a Cluster-Randomised School-Intervention to Reduce School Exclusion—Findings from Protocol-Based Subgroup Analyses
title_fullStr London Education and Inclusion Project (LEIP): Exploring Negative and Null Effects of a Cluster-Randomised School-Intervention to Reduce School Exclusion—Findings from Protocol-Based Subgroup Analyses
title_full_unstemmed London Education and Inclusion Project (LEIP): Exploring Negative and Null Effects of a Cluster-Randomised School-Intervention to Reduce School Exclusion—Findings from Protocol-Based Subgroup Analyses
title_short London Education and Inclusion Project (LEIP): Exploring Negative and Null Effects of a Cluster-Randomised School-Intervention to Reduce School Exclusion—Findings from Protocol-Based Subgroup Analyses
title_sort london education and inclusion project (leip): exploring negative and null effects of a cluster-randomised school-intervention to reduce school exclusion—findings from protocol-based subgroup analyses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4821581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27045953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152423
work_keys_str_mv AT obsuthingrid londoneducationandinclusionprojectleipexploringnegativeandnulleffectsofaclusterrandomisedschoolinterventiontoreduceschoolexclusionfindingsfromprotocolbasedsubgroupanalyses
AT copeaiden londoneducationandinclusionprojectleipexploringnegativeandnulleffectsofaclusterrandomisedschoolinterventiontoreduceschoolexclusionfindingsfromprotocolbasedsubgroupanalyses
AT sutherlandalex londoneducationandinclusionprojectleipexploringnegativeandnulleffectsofaclusterrandomisedschoolinterventiontoreduceschoolexclusionfindingsfromprotocolbasedsubgroupanalyses
AT pilbeamliv londoneducationandinclusionprojectleipexploringnegativeandnulleffectsofaclusterrandomisedschoolinterventiontoreduceschoolexclusionfindingsfromprotocolbasedsubgroupanalyses
AT murrayajalouise londoneducationandinclusionprojectleipexploringnegativeandnulleffectsofaclusterrandomisedschoolinterventiontoreduceschoolexclusionfindingsfromprotocolbasedsubgroupanalyses
AT eisnermanuel londoneducationandinclusionprojectleipexploringnegativeandnulleffectsofaclusterrandomisedschoolinterventiontoreduceschoolexclusionfindingsfromprotocolbasedsubgroupanalyses