Cargando…
London Education and Inclusion Project (LEIP): Exploring Negative and Null Effects of a Cluster-Randomised School-Intervention to Reduce School Exclusion—Findings from Protocol-Based Subgroup Analyses
This paper presents subgroup analyses from the London Education and Inclusion Project (LEIP). LEIP was a cluster-randomised controlled trial of an intervention called Engage in Education-London (EiE-L) which aimed to reduce school exclusions in those at greatest risk of exclusion. Pupils in the cont...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4821581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27045953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152423 |
_version_ | 1782425614185136128 |
---|---|
author | Obsuth, Ingrid Cope, Aiden Sutherland, Alex Pilbeam, Liv Murray, Aja Louise Eisner, Manuel |
author_facet | Obsuth, Ingrid Cope, Aiden Sutherland, Alex Pilbeam, Liv Murray, Aja Louise Eisner, Manuel |
author_sort | Obsuth, Ingrid |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper presents subgroup analyses from the London Education and Inclusion Project (LEIP). LEIP was a cluster-randomised controlled trial of an intervention called Engage in Education-London (EiE-L) which aimed to reduce school exclusions in those at greatest risk of exclusion. Pupils in the control schools attended an hour-long employability seminar. Minimisation was used to randomly assign schools to treatment and control following baseline data collection. The study involved 36 schools (17 in treatment—373 pupils; 19 in control—369 pupils) with >28% free school meal eligibility across London and utilised on pupil self-reports, teacher reports as well as official records to assess the effectiveness of EiE-L. Due to multiple data sources, sample sizes varied according to analysis. Analyses of pre-specified subgroups revealed null and negative effects on school exclusion following the intervention. Our findings suggest that the design and implementation of EiE-L may have contributed to the negative outcomes for pupils in the treatment schools when compared to those in the control schools. These findings call into question the effectiveness of bolt-on short-term interventions with pupils, particularly those at the highest risk of school exclusion and when they are faced with multiple problems. This is especially pertinent given the possibility of negative outcomes. Trial Registration: Controlled Trials: ISRCTN23244695 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4821581 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48215812016-04-22 London Education and Inclusion Project (LEIP): Exploring Negative and Null Effects of a Cluster-Randomised School-Intervention to Reduce School Exclusion—Findings from Protocol-Based Subgroup Analyses Obsuth, Ingrid Cope, Aiden Sutherland, Alex Pilbeam, Liv Murray, Aja Louise Eisner, Manuel PLoS One Research Article This paper presents subgroup analyses from the London Education and Inclusion Project (LEIP). LEIP was a cluster-randomised controlled trial of an intervention called Engage in Education-London (EiE-L) which aimed to reduce school exclusions in those at greatest risk of exclusion. Pupils in the control schools attended an hour-long employability seminar. Minimisation was used to randomly assign schools to treatment and control following baseline data collection. The study involved 36 schools (17 in treatment—373 pupils; 19 in control—369 pupils) with >28% free school meal eligibility across London and utilised on pupil self-reports, teacher reports as well as official records to assess the effectiveness of EiE-L. Due to multiple data sources, sample sizes varied according to analysis. Analyses of pre-specified subgroups revealed null and negative effects on school exclusion following the intervention. Our findings suggest that the design and implementation of EiE-L may have contributed to the negative outcomes for pupils in the treatment schools when compared to those in the control schools. These findings call into question the effectiveness of bolt-on short-term interventions with pupils, particularly those at the highest risk of school exclusion and when they are faced with multiple problems. This is especially pertinent given the possibility of negative outcomes. Trial Registration: Controlled Trials: ISRCTN23244695 Public Library of Science 2016-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4821581/ /pubmed/27045953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152423 Text en © 2016 Obsuth et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Obsuth, Ingrid Cope, Aiden Sutherland, Alex Pilbeam, Liv Murray, Aja Louise Eisner, Manuel London Education and Inclusion Project (LEIP): Exploring Negative and Null Effects of a Cluster-Randomised School-Intervention to Reduce School Exclusion—Findings from Protocol-Based Subgroup Analyses |
title | London Education and Inclusion Project (LEIP): Exploring Negative and Null Effects of a Cluster-Randomised School-Intervention to Reduce School Exclusion—Findings from Protocol-Based Subgroup Analyses |
title_full | London Education and Inclusion Project (LEIP): Exploring Negative and Null Effects of a Cluster-Randomised School-Intervention to Reduce School Exclusion—Findings from Protocol-Based Subgroup Analyses |
title_fullStr | London Education and Inclusion Project (LEIP): Exploring Negative and Null Effects of a Cluster-Randomised School-Intervention to Reduce School Exclusion—Findings from Protocol-Based Subgroup Analyses |
title_full_unstemmed | London Education and Inclusion Project (LEIP): Exploring Negative and Null Effects of a Cluster-Randomised School-Intervention to Reduce School Exclusion—Findings from Protocol-Based Subgroup Analyses |
title_short | London Education and Inclusion Project (LEIP): Exploring Negative and Null Effects of a Cluster-Randomised School-Intervention to Reduce School Exclusion—Findings from Protocol-Based Subgroup Analyses |
title_sort | london education and inclusion project (leip): exploring negative and null effects of a cluster-randomised school-intervention to reduce school exclusion—findings from protocol-based subgroup analyses |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4821581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27045953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152423 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT obsuthingrid londoneducationandinclusionprojectleipexploringnegativeandnulleffectsofaclusterrandomisedschoolinterventiontoreduceschoolexclusionfindingsfromprotocolbasedsubgroupanalyses AT copeaiden londoneducationandinclusionprojectleipexploringnegativeandnulleffectsofaclusterrandomisedschoolinterventiontoreduceschoolexclusionfindingsfromprotocolbasedsubgroupanalyses AT sutherlandalex londoneducationandinclusionprojectleipexploringnegativeandnulleffectsofaclusterrandomisedschoolinterventiontoreduceschoolexclusionfindingsfromprotocolbasedsubgroupanalyses AT pilbeamliv londoneducationandinclusionprojectleipexploringnegativeandnulleffectsofaclusterrandomisedschoolinterventiontoreduceschoolexclusionfindingsfromprotocolbasedsubgroupanalyses AT murrayajalouise londoneducationandinclusionprojectleipexploringnegativeandnulleffectsofaclusterrandomisedschoolinterventiontoreduceschoolexclusionfindingsfromprotocolbasedsubgroupanalyses AT eisnermanuel londoneducationandinclusionprojectleipexploringnegativeandnulleffectsofaclusterrandomisedschoolinterventiontoreduceschoolexclusionfindingsfromprotocolbasedsubgroupanalyses |