Cargando…

Attrition and success rates of accelerated students in nursing courses: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: There is a comprehensive literature on the academic outcomes (attrition and success) of students in traditional/baccalaureate nursing programs, but much less is known about the academic outcomes of students in accelerated nursing programs. The aim of this systematic review is to report o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doggrell, Sheila Anne, Schaffer, Sally
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4825075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27064943
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-016-0145-7
_version_ 1782426162896568320
author Doggrell, Sheila Anne
Schaffer, Sally
author_facet Doggrell, Sheila Anne
Schaffer, Sally
author_sort Doggrell, Sheila Anne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a comprehensive literature on the academic outcomes (attrition and success) of students in traditional/baccalaureate nursing programs, but much less is known about the academic outcomes of students in accelerated nursing programs. The aim of this systematic review is to report on the attrition and success rates (either internal examination or NCLEX-RN) of accelerated students, compared to traditional students. METHODS: For the systematic review, the databases (Pubmed, Cinahl and PsychINFO) and Google Scholar were searched using the search terms ‘accelerated’ or ‘accreditation for prior learning’, ‘fast-track’ or ‘top up’ and ‘nursing’ with ‘attrition’ or ‘retention’ or ‘withdrawal’ or ‘success’ from 1994 to January 2016. All relevant articles were included, regardless of quality. RESULTS: The findings of 19 studies of attrition rates and/or success rates for accelerated students are reported. For international accelerated students, there were only three studies, which are heterogeneous, and have major limitations. One of three studies has lower attrition rates, and one has shown higher success rates, than traditional students. In contrast, another study has shown high attrition and low success for international accelerated students. For graduate accelerated students, most of the studies are high quality, and showed that they have rates similar or better than traditional students. Thus, five of six studies have shown similar or lower attrition rates. Four of these studies with graduate accelerated students and an additional seven studies of success rates only, have shown similar or better success rates, than traditional students. There are only three studies of non-university graduate accelerated students, and these had weaknesses, but were consistent in reporting higher attrition rates than traditional students. CONCLUSIONS: The paucity and weakness of information available makes it unclear as to the attrition and/or success of international accelerated students in nursing programs. The good information available suggests that accelerated programs may be working reasonably well for the graduate students. However, the limited information available for non-university graduate students is weak, but consistent, in suggesting they may struggle in accelerated courses. Further studies are needed to determine the attrition and success rates of accelerated students, particularly for international and non-university graduate students.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4825075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48250752016-04-09 Attrition and success rates of accelerated students in nursing courses: a systematic review Doggrell, Sheila Anne Schaffer, Sally BMC Nurs Research Article BACKGROUND: There is a comprehensive literature on the academic outcomes (attrition and success) of students in traditional/baccalaureate nursing programs, but much less is known about the academic outcomes of students in accelerated nursing programs. The aim of this systematic review is to report on the attrition and success rates (either internal examination or NCLEX-RN) of accelerated students, compared to traditional students. METHODS: For the systematic review, the databases (Pubmed, Cinahl and PsychINFO) and Google Scholar were searched using the search terms ‘accelerated’ or ‘accreditation for prior learning’, ‘fast-track’ or ‘top up’ and ‘nursing’ with ‘attrition’ or ‘retention’ or ‘withdrawal’ or ‘success’ from 1994 to January 2016. All relevant articles were included, regardless of quality. RESULTS: The findings of 19 studies of attrition rates and/or success rates for accelerated students are reported. For international accelerated students, there were only three studies, which are heterogeneous, and have major limitations. One of three studies has lower attrition rates, and one has shown higher success rates, than traditional students. In contrast, another study has shown high attrition and low success for international accelerated students. For graduate accelerated students, most of the studies are high quality, and showed that they have rates similar or better than traditional students. Thus, five of six studies have shown similar or lower attrition rates. Four of these studies with graduate accelerated students and an additional seven studies of success rates only, have shown similar or better success rates, than traditional students. There are only three studies of non-university graduate accelerated students, and these had weaknesses, but were consistent in reporting higher attrition rates than traditional students. CONCLUSIONS: The paucity and weakness of information available makes it unclear as to the attrition and/or success of international accelerated students in nursing programs. The good information available suggests that accelerated programs may be working reasonably well for the graduate students. However, the limited information available for non-university graduate students is weak, but consistent, in suggesting they may struggle in accelerated courses. Further studies are needed to determine the attrition and success rates of accelerated students, particularly for international and non-university graduate students. BioMed Central 2016-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4825075/ /pubmed/27064943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-016-0145-7 Text en © Doggrell and Schaffer. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Doggrell, Sheila Anne
Schaffer, Sally
Attrition and success rates of accelerated students in nursing courses: a systematic review
title Attrition and success rates of accelerated students in nursing courses: a systematic review
title_full Attrition and success rates of accelerated students in nursing courses: a systematic review
title_fullStr Attrition and success rates of accelerated students in nursing courses: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Attrition and success rates of accelerated students in nursing courses: a systematic review
title_short Attrition and success rates of accelerated students in nursing courses: a systematic review
title_sort attrition and success rates of accelerated students in nursing courses: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4825075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27064943
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-016-0145-7
work_keys_str_mv AT doggrellsheilaanne attritionandsuccessratesofacceleratedstudentsinnursingcoursesasystematicreview
AT schaffersally attritionandsuccessratesofacceleratedstudentsinnursingcoursesasystematicreview