Cargando…
Onto better TRAILs for cancer treatment
Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), also known as Apo-2 ligand (Apo2L), is a member of the TNF cytokine superfamily. By cross-linking TRAIL-Receptor (TRAIL-R) 1 or TRAIL-R2, also known as death receptors 4 and 5 (DR4 and DR5), TRAIL has the capability to induce apo...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4832109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26943322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2015.174 |
_version_ | 1782427192628609024 |
---|---|
author | de Miguel, D Lemke, J Anel, A Walczak, H Martinez-Lostao, L |
author_facet | de Miguel, D Lemke, J Anel, A Walczak, H Martinez-Lostao, L |
author_sort | de Miguel, D |
collection | PubMed |
description | Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), also known as Apo-2 ligand (Apo2L), is a member of the TNF cytokine superfamily. By cross-linking TRAIL-Receptor (TRAIL-R) 1 or TRAIL-R2, also known as death receptors 4 and 5 (DR4 and DR5), TRAIL has the capability to induce apoptosis in a wide variety of tumor cells while sparing vital normal cells. The discovery of this unique property among TNF superfamily members laid the foundation for testing the clinical potential of TRAIL-R-targeting therapies in the cancer clinic. To date, two of these therapeutic strategies have been tested clinically: (i) recombinant human TRAIL and (ii) antibodies directed against TRAIL-R1 or TRAIL-R2. Unfortunately, however, these TRAIL-R agonists have basically failed as most human tumors are resistant to apoptosis induction by them. It recently emerged that this is largely due to the poor agonistic activity of these agents. Consequently, novel TRAIL-R-targeting agents with increased bioactivity are currently being developed with the aim of rendering TRAIL-based therapies more active. This review summarizes these second-generation novel formulations of TRAIL and other TRAIL-R agonists, which exhibit enhanced cytotoxic capacity toward cancer cells, thereby providing the potential of being more effective when applied clinically than first-generation TRAIL-R agonists. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4832109 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48321092016-05-01 Onto better TRAILs for cancer treatment de Miguel, D Lemke, J Anel, A Walczak, H Martinez-Lostao, L Cell Death Differ Review Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), also known as Apo-2 ligand (Apo2L), is a member of the TNF cytokine superfamily. By cross-linking TRAIL-Receptor (TRAIL-R) 1 or TRAIL-R2, also known as death receptors 4 and 5 (DR4 and DR5), TRAIL has the capability to induce apoptosis in a wide variety of tumor cells while sparing vital normal cells. The discovery of this unique property among TNF superfamily members laid the foundation for testing the clinical potential of TRAIL-R-targeting therapies in the cancer clinic. To date, two of these therapeutic strategies have been tested clinically: (i) recombinant human TRAIL and (ii) antibodies directed against TRAIL-R1 or TRAIL-R2. Unfortunately, however, these TRAIL-R agonists have basically failed as most human tumors are resistant to apoptosis induction by them. It recently emerged that this is largely due to the poor agonistic activity of these agents. Consequently, novel TRAIL-R-targeting agents with increased bioactivity are currently being developed with the aim of rendering TRAIL-based therapies more active. This review summarizes these second-generation novel formulations of TRAIL and other TRAIL-R agonists, which exhibit enhanced cytotoxic capacity toward cancer cells, thereby providing the potential of being more effective when applied clinically than first-generation TRAIL-R agonists. Nature Publishing Group 2016-05 2016-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4832109/ /pubmed/26943322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2015.174 Text en Copyright © 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Review de Miguel, D Lemke, J Anel, A Walczak, H Martinez-Lostao, L Onto better TRAILs for cancer treatment |
title | Onto better TRAILs for cancer treatment |
title_full | Onto better TRAILs for cancer treatment |
title_fullStr | Onto better TRAILs for cancer treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Onto better TRAILs for cancer treatment |
title_short | Onto better TRAILs for cancer treatment |
title_sort | onto better trails for cancer treatment |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4832109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26943322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2015.174 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT demigueld ontobettertrailsforcancertreatment AT lemkej ontobettertrailsforcancertreatment AT anela ontobettertrailsforcancertreatment AT walczakh ontobettertrailsforcancertreatment AT martinezlostaol ontobettertrailsforcancertreatment |