Cargando…

Selective attention neutralizes the adverse effects of low socioeconomic status on memory in 9-month-old infants

Socioeconomic status (SES) has a documented impact on brain and cognitive development. We demonstrate that engaging spatial selective attention mechanisms may counteract this negative influence of impoverished environments on early learning. We previously used a spatial cueing task to compare target...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Markant, Julie, Ackerman, Laura K., Nussenbaum, Kate, Amso, Dima
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4834267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26597046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.10.009
_version_ 1782427461851545600
author Markant, Julie
Ackerman, Laura K.
Nussenbaum, Kate
Amso, Dima
author_facet Markant, Julie
Ackerman, Laura K.
Nussenbaum, Kate
Amso, Dima
author_sort Markant, Julie
collection PubMed
description Socioeconomic status (SES) has a documented impact on brain and cognitive development. We demonstrate that engaging spatial selective attention mechanisms may counteract this negative influence of impoverished environments on early learning. We previously used a spatial cueing task to compare target object encoding in the context of basic orienting (“facilitation”) versus a spatial selective attention orienting mechanism that engages distractor suppression (“IOR”). This work showed that object encoding in the context of IOR boosted 9-month-old infants’ recognition memory relative to facilitation (Markant and Amso, 2013). Here we asked whether this attention-memory link further interacted with SES in infancy. Results indicated that SES was related to memory but not attention orienting efficacy. However, the correlation between SES and memory performance was moderated by the attention mechanism engaged during encoding. SES predicted memory performance when objects were encoded with basic orienting processes, with infants from low-SES environments showing poorer memory than those from high-SES environments. However, SES did not predict memory performance among infants who engaged selective attention during encoding. Spatial selective attention engagement mitigated the effects of SES on memory and may offer an effective mechanism for promoting learning among infants at risk for poor cognitive outcomes related to SES.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4834267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48342672017-04-01 Selective attention neutralizes the adverse effects of low socioeconomic status on memory in 9-month-old infants Markant, Julie Ackerman, Laura K. Nussenbaum, Kate Amso, Dima Dev Cogn Neurosci Original Research Socioeconomic status (SES) has a documented impact on brain and cognitive development. We demonstrate that engaging spatial selective attention mechanisms may counteract this negative influence of impoverished environments on early learning. We previously used a spatial cueing task to compare target object encoding in the context of basic orienting (“facilitation”) versus a spatial selective attention orienting mechanism that engages distractor suppression (“IOR”). This work showed that object encoding in the context of IOR boosted 9-month-old infants’ recognition memory relative to facilitation (Markant and Amso, 2013). Here we asked whether this attention-memory link further interacted with SES in infancy. Results indicated that SES was related to memory but not attention orienting efficacy. However, the correlation between SES and memory performance was moderated by the attention mechanism engaged during encoding. SES predicted memory performance when objects were encoded with basic orienting processes, with infants from low-SES environments showing poorer memory than those from high-SES environments. However, SES did not predict memory performance among infants who engaged selective attention during encoding. Spatial selective attention engagement mitigated the effects of SES on memory and may offer an effective mechanism for promoting learning among infants at risk for poor cognitive outcomes related to SES. Elsevier 2015-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4834267/ /pubmed/26597046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.10.009 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Markant, Julie
Ackerman, Laura K.
Nussenbaum, Kate
Amso, Dima
Selective attention neutralizes the adverse effects of low socioeconomic status on memory in 9-month-old infants
title Selective attention neutralizes the adverse effects of low socioeconomic status on memory in 9-month-old infants
title_full Selective attention neutralizes the adverse effects of low socioeconomic status on memory in 9-month-old infants
title_fullStr Selective attention neutralizes the adverse effects of low socioeconomic status on memory in 9-month-old infants
title_full_unstemmed Selective attention neutralizes the adverse effects of low socioeconomic status on memory in 9-month-old infants
title_short Selective attention neutralizes the adverse effects of low socioeconomic status on memory in 9-month-old infants
title_sort selective attention neutralizes the adverse effects of low socioeconomic status on memory in 9-month-old infants
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4834267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26597046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.10.009
work_keys_str_mv AT markantjulie selectiveattentionneutralizestheadverseeffectsoflowsocioeconomicstatusonmemoryin9montholdinfants
AT ackermanlaurak selectiveattentionneutralizestheadverseeffectsoflowsocioeconomicstatusonmemoryin9montholdinfants
AT nussenbaumkate selectiveattentionneutralizestheadverseeffectsoflowsocioeconomicstatusonmemoryin9montholdinfants
AT amsodima selectiveattentionneutralizestheadverseeffectsoflowsocioeconomicstatusonmemoryin9montholdinfants