Reporting of harms outcomes: a comparison of journal publications with unpublished clinical study reports of orlistat trials

BACKGROUND: The quality of harms reporting in journal publications is often poor, which can impede the risk-benefit interpretation of a clinical trial. Clinical study reports can provide more reliable, complete, and informative data on harms compared to the corresponding journal publication. This ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hodkinson, Alex, Gamble, Carrol, Smith, Catrin Tudur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Research
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4840982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27103582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1327-z

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4840982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27103582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1327-z

Ejemplares similares