Cargando…

Comparison of Boiling and Robotics Automation Method in DNA Extraction for Metagenomic Sequencing of Human Oral Microbes

The rapid improvement of next-generation sequencing performance now enables us to analyze huge sample sets with more than ten thousand specimens. However, DNA extraction can still be a limiting step in such metagenomic approaches. In this study, we analyzed human oral microbes to compare the perform...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamagishi, Junya, Sato, Yukuto, Shinozaki, Natsuko, Ye, Bin, Tsuboi, Akito, Nagasaki, Masao, Yamashita, Riu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4841512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27104353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154389
_version_ 1782428399249129472
author Yamagishi, Junya
Sato, Yukuto
Shinozaki, Natsuko
Ye, Bin
Tsuboi, Akito
Nagasaki, Masao
Yamashita, Riu
author_facet Yamagishi, Junya
Sato, Yukuto
Shinozaki, Natsuko
Ye, Bin
Tsuboi, Akito
Nagasaki, Masao
Yamashita, Riu
author_sort Yamagishi, Junya
collection PubMed
description The rapid improvement of next-generation sequencing performance now enables us to analyze huge sample sets with more than ten thousand specimens. However, DNA extraction can still be a limiting step in such metagenomic approaches. In this study, we analyzed human oral microbes to compare the performance of three DNA extraction methods: PowerSoil (a method widely used in this field), QIAsymphony (a robotics method), and a simple boiling method. Dental plaque was initially collected from three volunteers in the pilot study and then expanded to 12 volunteers in the follow-up study. Bacterial flora was estimated by sequencing the V4 region of 16S rRNA following species-level profiling. Our results indicate that the efficiency of PowerSoil and QIAsymphony was comparable to the boiling method. Therefore, the boiling method may be a promising alternative because of its simplicity, cost effectiveness, and short handling time. Moreover, this method was reliable for estimating bacterial species and could be used in the future to examine the correlation between oral flora and health status. Despite this, differences in the efficiency of DNA extraction for various bacterial species were observed among the three methods. Based on these findings, there is no “gold standard” for DNA extraction. In future, we suggest that the DNA extraction method should be selected on a case-by-case basis considering the aims and specimens of the study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4841512
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48415122016-04-29 Comparison of Boiling and Robotics Automation Method in DNA Extraction for Metagenomic Sequencing of Human Oral Microbes Yamagishi, Junya Sato, Yukuto Shinozaki, Natsuko Ye, Bin Tsuboi, Akito Nagasaki, Masao Yamashita, Riu PLoS One Research Article The rapid improvement of next-generation sequencing performance now enables us to analyze huge sample sets with more than ten thousand specimens. However, DNA extraction can still be a limiting step in such metagenomic approaches. In this study, we analyzed human oral microbes to compare the performance of three DNA extraction methods: PowerSoil (a method widely used in this field), QIAsymphony (a robotics method), and a simple boiling method. Dental plaque was initially collected from three volunteers in the pilot study and then expanded to 12 volunteers in the follow-up study. Bacterial flora was estimated by sequencing the V4 region of 16S rRNA following species-level profiling. Our results indicate that the efficiency of PowerSoil and QIAsymphony was comparable to the boiling method. Therefore, the boiling method may be a promising alternative because of its simplicity, cost effectiveness, and short handling time. Moreover, this method was reliable for estimating bacterial species and could be used in the future to examine the correlation between oral flora and health status. Despite this, differences in the efficiency of DNA extraction for various bacterial species were observed among the three methods. Based on these findings, there is no “gold standard” for DNA extraction. In future, we suggest that the DNA extraction method should be selected on a case-by-case basis considering the aims and specimens of the study. Public Library of Science 2016-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4841512/ /pubmed/27104353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154389 Text en © 2016 Yamagishi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yamagishi, Junya
Sato, Yukuto
Shinozaki, Natsuko
Ye, Bin
Tsuboi, Akito
Nagasaki, Masao
Yamashita, Riu
Comparison of Boiling and Robotics Automation Method in DNA Extraction for Metagenomic Sequencing of Human Oral Microbes
title Comparison of Boiling and Robotics Automation Method in DNA Extraction for Metagenomic Sequencing of Human Oral Microbes
title_full Comparison of Boiling and Robotics Automation Method in DNA Extraction for Metagenomic Sequencing of Human Oral Microbes
title_fullStr Comparison of Boiling and Robotics Automation Method in DNA Extraction for Metagenomic Sequencing of Human Oral Microbes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Boiling and Robotics Automation Method in DNA Extraction for Metagenomic Sequencing of Human Oral Microbes
title_short Comparison of Boiling and Robotics Automation Method in DNA Extraction for Metagenomic Sequencing of Human Oral Microbes
title_sort comparison of boiling and robotics automation method in dna extraction for metagenomic sequencing of human oral microbes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4841512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27104353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154389
work_keys_str_mv AT yamagishijunya comparisonofboilingandroboticsautomationmethodindnaextractionformetagenomicsequencingofhumanoralmicrobes
AT satoyukuto comparisonofboilingandroboticsautomationmethodindnaextractionformetagenomicsequencingofhumanoralmicrobes
AT shinozakinatsuko comparisonofboilingandroboticsautomationmethodindnaextractionformetagenomicsequencingofhumanoralmicrobes
AT yebin comparisonofboilingandroboticsautomationmethodindnaextractionformetagenomicsequencingofhumanoralmicrobes
AT tsuboiakito comparisonofboilingandroboticsautomationmethodindnaextractionformetagenomicsequencingofhumanoralmicrobes
AT nagasakimasao comparisonofboilingandroboticsautomationmethodindnaextractionformetagenomicsequencingofhumanoralmicrobes
AT yamashitariu comparisonofboilingandroboticsautomationmethodindnaextractionformetagenomicsequencingofhumanoralmicrobes