Cargando…
Comparison of Boiling and Robotics Automation Method in DNA Extraction for Metagenomic Sequencing of Human Oral Microbes
The rapid improvement of next-generation sequencing performance now enables us to analyze huge sample sets with more than ten thousand specimens. However, DNA extraction can still be a limiting step in such metagenomic approaches. In this study, we analyzed human oral microbes to compare the perform...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4841512/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27104353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154389 |
_version_ | 1782428399249129472 |
---|---|
author | Yamagishi, Junya Sato, Yukuto Shinozaki, Natsuko Ye, Bin Tsuboi, Akito Nagasaki, Masao Yamashita, Riu |
author_facet | Yamagishi, Junya Sato, Yukuto Shinozaki, Natsuko Ye, Bin Tsuboi, Akito Nagasaki, Masao Yamashita, Riu |
author_sort | Yamagishi, Junya |
collection | PubMed |
description | The rapid improvement of next-generation sequencing performance now enables us to analyze huge sample sets with more than ten thousand specimens. However, DNA extraction can still be a limiting step in such metagenomic approaches. In this study, we analyzed human oral microbes to compare the performance of three DNA extraction methods: PowerSoil (a method widely used in this field), QIAsymphony (a robotics method), and a simple boiling method. Dental plaque was initially collected from three volunteers in the pilot study and then expanded to 12 volunteers in the follow-up study. Bacterial flora was estimated by sequencing the V4 region of 16S rRNA following species-level profiling. Our results indicate that the efficiency of PowerSoil and QIAsymphony was comparable to the boiling method. Therefore, the boiling method may be a promising alternative because of its simplicity, cost effectiveness, and short handling time. Moreover, this method was reliable for estimating bacterial species and could be used in the future to examine the correlation between oral flora and health status. Despite this, differences in the efficiency of DNA extraction for various bacterial species were observed among the three methods. Based on these findings, there is no “gold standard” for DNA extraction. In future, we suggest that the DNA extraction method should be selected on a case-by-case basis considering the aims and specimens of the study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4841512 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48415122016-04-29 Comparison of Boiling and Robotics Automation Method in DNA Extraction for Metagenomic Sequencing of Human Oral Microbes Yamagishi, Junya Sato, Yukuto Shinozaki, Natsuko Ye, Bin Tsuboi, Akito Nagasaki, Masao Yamashita, Riu PLoS One Research Article The rapid improvement of next-generation sequencing performance now enables us to analyze huge sample sets with more than ten thousand specimens. However, DNA extraction can still be a limiting step in such metagenomic approaches. In this study, we analyzed human oral microbes to compare the performance of three DNA extraction methods: PowerSoil (a method widely used in this field), QIAsymphony (a robotics method), and a simple boiling method. Dental plaque was initially collected from three volunteers in the pilot study and then expanded to 12 volunteers in the follow-up study. Bacterial flora was estimated by sequencing the V4 region of 16S rRNA following species-level profiling. Our results indicate that the efficiency of PowerSoil and QIAsymphony was comparable to the boiling method. Therefore, the boiling method may be a promising alternative because of its simplicity, cost effectiveness, and short handling time. Moreover, this method was reliable for estimating bacterial species and could be used in the future to examine the correlation between oral flora and health status. Despite this, differences in the efficiency of DNA extraction for various bacterial species were observed among the three methods. Based on these findings, there is no “gold standard” for DNA extraction. In future, we suggest that the DNA extraction method should be selected on a case-by-case basis considering the aims and specimens of the study. Public Library of Science 2016-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4841512/ /pubmed/27104353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154389 Text en © 2016 Yamagishi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yamagishi, Junya Sato, Yukuto Shinozaki, Natsuko Ye, Bin Tsuboi, Akito Nagasaki, Masao Yamashita, Riu Comparison of Boiling and Robotics Automation Method in DNA Extraction for Metagenomic Sequencing of Human Oral Microbes |
title | Comparison of Boiling and Robotics Automation Method in DNA Extraction for Metagenomic Sequencing of Human Oral Microbes |
title_full | Comparison of Boiling and Robotics Automation Method in DNA Extraction for Metagenomic Sequencing of Human Oral Microbes |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Boiling and Robotics Automation Method in DNA Extraction for Metagenomic Sequencing of Human Oral Microbes |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Boiling and Robotics Automation Method in DNA Extraction for Metagenomic Sequencing of Human Oral Microbes |
title_short | Comparison of Boiling and Robotics Automation Method in DNA Extraction for Metagenomic Sequencing of Human Oral Microbes |
title_sort | comparison of boiling and robotics automation method in dna extraction for metagenomic sequencing of human oral microbes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4841512/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27104353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154389 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yamagishijunya comparisonofboilingandroboticsautomationmethodindnaextractionformetagenomicsequencingofhumanoralmicrobes AT satoyukuto comparisonofboilingandroboticsautomationmethodindnaextractionformetagenomicsequencingofhumanoralmicrobes AT shinozakinatsuko comparisonofboilingandroboticsautomationmethodindnaextractionformetagenomicsequencingofhumanoralmicrobes AT yebin comparisonofboilingandroboticsautomationmethodindnaextractionformetagenomicsequencingofhumanoralmicrobes AT tsuboiakito comparisonofboilingandroboticsautomationmethodindnaextractionformetagenomicsequencingofhumanoralmicrobes AT nagasakimasao comparisonofboilingandroboticsautomationmethodindnaextractionformetagenomicsequencingofhumanoralmicrobes AT yamashitariu comparisonofboilingandroboticsautomationmethodindnaextractionformetagenomicsequencingofhumanoralmicrobes |