Cargando…
Comparison of two high-throughput semiconductor chip sequencing platforms in noninvasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome in early pregnancy
BACKGROUND: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) to detect fetal aneuploidy using next-generation sequencing on ion semiconductor platforms has become common. There are several sequencers that can generate sufficient DNA reads for NIPT. However, the approval criteria vary among platforms and countrie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4851803/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27129388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-016-0182-9 |
_version_ | 1782429865268477952 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Sunshin Jung, HeeJung Han, Sung Hee Lee, SeungJae Kwon, JeongSub Kim, Min Gyun Chu, Hyungsik Chen, Hongliang Han, Kyudong Kwak, Hwanjong Park, Sunghoon Joo, Hee Jae Kim, Byung Chul Bhak, Jong |
author_facet | Kim, Sunshin Jung, HeeJung Han, Sung Hee Lee, SeungJae Kwon, JeongSub Kim, Min Gyun Chu, Hyungsik Chen, Hongliang Han, Kyudong Kwak, Hwanjong Park, Sunghoon Joo, Hee Jae Kim, Byung Chul Bhak, Jong |
author_sort | Kim, Sunshin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) to detect fetal aneuploidy using next-generation sequencing on ion semiconductor platforms has become common. There are several sequencers that can generate sufficient DNA reads for NIPT. However, the approval criteria vary among platforms and countries. This can delay the introduction of such devices and systems to clinics. A comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of two different platforms using the same sequencing chemistry could be useful in NIPT for fetal chromosomal aneuploidies. This would improve healthcare authorities’ confidence in decision-making on sequencing-based tests. METHODS: One hundred and one pregnant women who were predicted at high risk of fetal defects using conventional prenatal screening tests, and who underwent definitive diagnosis by full karyotyping, were enrolled from three hospitals in Korea. Most of the pregnant women (69.79 %) received NIPT during weeks 11–13 of gestation and 30.21 % during weeks 14–18. We used Ion Torrent PGM and Proton semi-conductor-based sequencers with 0.3× sequencing coverage depth. The average total reads of 101 samples were approximately 4.5 and 7.6 M for PGM and Proton, respectively. A Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA) algorithm was used for the alignment, and a z-score was used to decide fetal trisomy 21. Interactive dot diagrams from the sequencing data showed minimal z-score values of 2.07 and 2.10 to discriminate negative versus positive cases of fetal trisomy 21 for the two different sequencing systems. RESULTS: Our z-score-based discrimination method resulted in 100 % positive and negative prediction values for both ion semiconductor PGM and Proton sequencers, regardless of their sequencing chip and chemistry differences. Both platforms performed well at an early stage (11–13 weeks of gestation) compared with previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggested that, using two different sequencers, NIPT to detect fetal trisomy 21 in early pregnancy is accurate and platform-independent. The data suggested that the amount of sequencing and the application of common, simple, and robust statistical analyses are more important than sequencing chemistry and platform types. This result has practical implications in countries where PGM is approved for NIPT but the Proton system is not. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4851803 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48518032016-05-01 Comparison of two high-throughput semiconductor chip sequencing platforms in noninvasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome in early pregnancy Kim, Sunshin Jung, HeeJung Han, Sung Hee Lee, SeungJae Kwon, JeongSub Kim, Min Gyun Chu, Hyungsik Chen, Hongliang Han, Kyudong Kwak, Hwanjong Park, Sunghoon Joo, Hee Jae Kim, Byung Chul Bhak, Jong BMC Med Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) to detect fetal aneuploidy using next-generation sequencing on ion semiconductor platforms has become common. There are several sequencers that can generate sufficient DNA reads for NIPT. However, the approval criteria vary among platforms and countries. This can delay the introduction of such devices and systems to clinics. A comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of two different platforms using the same sequencing chemistry could be useful in NIPT for fetal chromosomal aneuploidies. This would improve healthcare authorities’ confidence in decision-making on sequencing-based tests. METHODS: One hundred and one pregnant women who were predicted at high risk of fetal defects using conventional prenatal screening tests, and who underwent definitive diagnosis by full karyotyping, were enrolled from three hospitals in Korea. Most of the pregnant women (69.79 %) received NIPT during weeks 11–13 of gestation and 30.21 % during weeks 14–18. We used Ion Torrent PGM and Proton semi-conductor-based sequencers with 0.3× sequencing coverage depth. The average total reads of 101 samples were approximately 4.5 and 7.6 M for PGM and Proton, respectively. A Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA) algorithm was used for the alignment, and a z-score was used to decide fetal trisomy 21. Interactive dot diagrams from the sequencing data showed minimal z-score values of 2.07 and 2.10 to discriminate negative versus positive cases of fetal trisomy 21 for the two different sequencing systems. RESULTS: Our z-score-based discrimination method resulted in 100 % positive and negative prediction values for both ion semiconductor PGM and Proton sequencers, regardless of their sequencing chip and chemistry differences. Both platforms performed well at an early stage (11–13 weeks of gestation) compared with previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggested that, using two different sequencers, NIPT to detect fetal trisomy 21 in early pregnancy is accurate and platform-independent. The data suggested that the amount of sequencing and the application of common, simple, and robust statistical analyses are more important than sequencing chemistry and platform types. This result has practical implications in countries where PGM is approved for NIPT but the Proton system is not. BioMed Central 2016-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4851803/ /pubmed/27129388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-016-0182-9 Text en © Kim et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kim, Sunshin Jung, HeeJung Han, Sung Hee Lee, SeungJae Kwon, JeongSub Kim, Min Gyun Chu, Hyungsik Chen, Hongliang Han, Kyudong Kwak, Hwanjong Park, Sunghoon Joo, Hee Jae Kim, Byung Chul Bhak, Jong Comparison of two high-throughput semiconductor chip sequencing platforms in noninvasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome in early pregnancy |
title | Comparison of two high-throughput semiconductor chip sequencing platforms in noninvasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome in early pregnancy |
title_full | Comparison of two high-throughput semiconductor chip sequencing platforms in noninvasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome in early pregnancy |
title_fullStr | Comparison of two high-throughput semiconductor chip sequencing platforms in noninvasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome in early pregnancy |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of two high-throughput semiconductor chip sequencing platforms in noninvasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome in early pregnancy |
title_short | Comparison of two high-throughput semiconductor chip sequencing platforms in noninvasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome in early pregnancy |
title_sort | comparison of two high-throughput semiconductor chip sequencing platforms in noninvasive prenatal testing for down syndrome in early pregnancy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4851803/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27129388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-016-0182-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimsunshin comparisonoftwohighthroughputsemiconductorchipsequencingplatformsinnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeinearlypregnancy AT jungheejung comparisonoftwohighthroughputsemiconductorchipsequencingplatformsinnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeinearlypregnancy AT hansunghee comparisonoftwohighthroughputsemiconductorchipsequencingplatformsinnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeinearlypregnancy AT leeseungjae comparisonoftwohighthroughputsemiconductorchipsequencingplatformsinnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeinearlypregnancy AT kwonjeongsub comparisonoftwohighthroughputsemiconductorchipsequencingplatformsinnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeinearlypregnancy AT kimmingyun comparisonoftwohighthroughputsemiconductorchipsequencingplatformsinnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeinearlypregnancy AT chuhyungsik comparisonoftwohighthroughputsemiconductorchipsequencingplatformsinnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeinearlypregnancy AT chenhongliang comparisonoftwohighthroughputsemiconductorchipsequencingplatformsinnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeinearlypregnancy AT hankyudong comparisonoftwohighthroughputsemiconductorchipsequencingplatformsinnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeinearlypregnancy AT kwakhwanjong comparisonoftwohighthroughputsemiconductorchipsequencingplatformsinnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeinearlypregnancy AT parksunghoon comparisonoftwohighthroughputsemiconductorchipsequencingplatformsinnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeinearlypregnancy AT jooheejae comparisonoftwohighthroughputsemiconductorchipsequencingplatformsinnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeinearlypregnancy AT kimbyungchul comparisonoftwohighthroughputsemiconductorchipsequencingplatformsinnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeinearlypregnancy AT bhakjong comparisonoftwohighthroughputsemiconductorchipsequencingplatformsinnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeinearlypregnancy |