Cargando…

Comparison of two high-throughput semiconductor chip sequencing platforms in noninvasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome in early pregnancy

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) to detect fetal aneuploidy using next-generation sequencing on ion semiconductor platforms has become common. There are several sequencers that can generate sufficient DNA reads for NIPT. However, the approval criteria vary among platforms and countrie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Sunshin, Jung, HeeJung, Han, Sung Hee, Lee, SeungJae, Kwon, JeongSub, Kim, Min Gyun, Chu, Hyungsik, Chen, Hongliang, Han, Kyudong, Kwak, Hwanjong, Park, Sunghoon, Joo, Hee Jae, Kim, Byung Chul, Bhak, Jong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4851803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27129388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-016-0182-9
_version_ 1782429865268477952
author Kim, Sunshin
Jung, HeeJung
Han, Sung Hee
Lee, SeungJae
Kwon, JeongSub
Kim, Min Gyun
Chu, Hyungsik
Chen, Hongliang
Han, Kyudong
Kwak, Hwanjong
Park, Sunghoon
Joo, Hee Jae
Kim, Byung Chul
Bhak, Jong
author_facet Kim, Sunshin
Jung, HeeJung
Han, Sung Hee
Lee, SeungJae
Kwon, JeongSub
Kim, Min Gyun
Chu, Hyungsik
Chen, Hongliang
Han, Kyudong
Kwak, Hwanjong
Park, Sunghoon
Joo, Hee Jae
Kim, Byung Chul
Bhak, Jong
author_sort Kim, Sunshin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) to detect fetal aneuploidy using next-generation sequencing on ion semiconductor platforms has become common. There are several sequencers that can generate sufficient DNA reads for NIPT. However, the approval criteria vary among platforms and countries. This can delay the introduction of such devices and systems to clinics. A comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of two different platforms using the same sequencing chemistry could be useful in NIPT for fetal chromosomal aneuploidies. This would improve healthcare authorities’ confidence in decision-making on sequencing-based tests. METHODS: One hundred and one pregnant women who were predicted at high risk of fetal defects using conventional prenatal screening tests, and who underwent definitive diagnosis by full karyotyping, were enrolled from three hospitals in Korea. Most of the pregnant women (69.79 %) received NIPT during weeks 11–13 of gestation and 30.21 % during weeks 14–18. We used Ion Torrent PGM and Proton semi-conductor-based sequencers with 0.3× sequencing coverage depth. The average total reads of 101 samples were approximately 4.5 and 7.6 M for PGM and Proton, respectively. A Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA) algorithm was used for the alignment, and a z-score was used to decide fetal trisomy 21. Interactive dot diagrams from the sequencing data showed minimal z-score values of 2.07 and 2.10 to discriminate negative versus positive cases of fetal trisomy 21 for the two different sequencing systems. RESULTS: Our z-score-based discrimination method resulted in 100 % positive and negative prediction values for both ion semiconductor PGM and Proton sequencers, regardless of their sequencing chip and chemistry differences. Both platforms performed well at an early stage (11–13 weeks of gestation) compared with previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggested that, using two different sequencers, NIPT to detect fetal trisomy 21 in early pregnancy is accurate and platform-independent. The data suggested that the amount of sequencing and the application of common, simple, and robust statistical analyses are more important than sequencing chemistry and platform types. This result has practical implications in countries where PGM is approved for NIPT but the Proton system is not.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4851803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48518032016-05-01 Comparison of two high-throughput semiconductor chip sequencing platforms in noninvasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome in early pregnancy Kim, Sunshin Jung, HeeJung Han, Sung Hee Lee, SeungJae Kwon, JeongSub Kim, Min Gyun Chu, Hyungsik Chen, Hongliang Han, Kyudong Kwak, Hwanjong Park, Sunghoon Joo, Hee Jae Kim, Byung Chul Bhak, Jong BMC Med Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) to detect fetal aneuploidy using next-generation sequencing on ion semiconductor platforms has become common. There are several sequencers that can generate sufficient DNA reads for NIPT. However, the approval criteria vary among platforms and countries. This can delay the introduction of such devices and systems to clinics. A comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of two different platforms using the same sequencing chemistry could be useful in NIPT for fetal chromosomal aneuploidies. This would improve healthcare authorities’ confidence in decision-making on sequencing-based tests. METHODS: One hundred and one pregnant women who were predicted at high risk of fetal defects using conventional prenatal screening tests, and who underwent definitive diagnosis by full karyotyping, were enrolled from three hospitals in Korea. Most of the pregnant women (69.79 %) received NIPT during weeks 11–13 of gestation and 30.21 % during weeks 14–18. We used Ion Torrent PGM and Proton semi-conductor-based sequencers with 0.3× sequencing coverage depth. The average total reads of 101 samples were approximately 4.5 and 7.6 M for PGM and Proton, respectively. A Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA) algorithm was used for the alignment, and a z-score was used to decide fetal trisomy 21. Interactive dot diagrams from the sequencing data showed minimal z-score values of 2.07 and 2.10 to discriminate negative versus positive cases of fetal trisomy 21 for the two different sequencing systems. RESULTS: Our z-score-based discrimination method resulted in 100 % positive and negative prediction values for both ion semiconductor PGM and Proton sequencers, regardless of their sequencing chip and chemistry differences. Both platforms performed well at an early stage (11–13 weeks of gestation) compared with previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggested that, using two different sequencers, NIPT to detect fetal trisomy 21 in early pregnancy is accurate and platform-independent. The data suggested that the amount of sequencing and the application of common, simple, and robust statistical analyses are more important than sequencing chemistry and platform types. This result has practical implications in countries where PGM is approved for NIPT but the Proton system is not. BioMed Central 2016-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4851803/ /pubmed/27129388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-016-0182-9 Text en © Kim et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, Sunshin
Jung, HeeJung
Han, Sung Hee
Lee, SeungJae
Kwon, JeongSub
Kim, Min Gyun
Chu, Hyungsik
Chen, Hongliang
Han, Kyudong
Kwak, Hwanjong
Park, Sunghoon
Joo, Hee Jae
Kim, Byung Chul
Bhak, Jong
Comparison of two high-throughput semiconductor chip sequencing platforms in noninvasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome in early pregnancy
title Comparison of two high-throughput semiconductor chip sequencing platforms in noninvasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome in early pregnancy
title_full Comparison of two high-throughput semiconductor chip sequencing platforms in noninvasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome in early pregnancy
title_fullStr Comparison of two high-throughput semiconductor chip sequencing platforms in noninvasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome in early pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two high-throughput semiconductor chip sequencing platforms in noninvasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome in early pregnancy
title_short Comparison of two high-throughput semiconductor chip sequencing platforms in noninvasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome in early pregnancy
title_sort comparison of two high-throughput semiconductor chip sequencing platforms in noninvasive prenatal testing for down syndrome in early pregnancy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4851803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27129388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-016-0182-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kimsunshin comparisonoftwohighthroughputsemiconductorchipsequencingplatformsinnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeinearlypregnancy
AT jungheejung comparisonoftwohighthroughputsemiconductorchipsequencingplatformsinnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeinearlypregnancy
AT hansunghee comparisonoftwohighthroughputsemiconductorchipsequencingplatformsinnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeinearlypregnancy
AT leeseungjae comparisonoftwohighthroughputsemiconductorchipsequencingplatformsinnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeinearlypregnancy
AT kwonjeongsub comparisonoftwohighthroughputsemiconductorchipsequencingplatformsinnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeinearlypregnancy
AT kimmingyun comparisonoftwohighthroughputsemiconductorchipsequencingplatformsinnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeinearlypregnancy
AT chuhyungsik comparisonoftwohighthroughputsemiconductorchipsequencingplatformsinnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeinearlypregnancy
AT chenhongliang comparisonoftwohighthroughputsemiconductorchipsequencingplatformsinnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeinearlypregnancy
AT hankyudong comparisonoftwohighthroughputsemiconductorchipsequencingplatformsinnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeinearlypregnancy
AT kwakhwanjong comparisonoftwohighthroughputsemiconductorchipsequencingplatformsinnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeinearlypregnancy
AT parksunghoon comparisonoftwohighthroughputsemiconductorchipsequencingplatformsinnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeinearlypregnancy
AT jooheejae comparisonoftwohighthroughputsemiconductorchipsequencingplatformsinnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeinearlypregnancy
AT kimbyungchul comparisonoftwohighthroughputsemiconductorchipsequencingplatformsinnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeinearlypregnancy
AT bhakjong comparisonoftwohighthroughputsemiconductorchipsequencingplatformsinnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeinearlypregnancy