Cargando…

An evaluation of UK foundation trainee doctors’ learning behaviours in a technology-enhanced learning environment

BACKGROUND: Technology-Enhanced Learning (TEL) can be used to educate Foundation Programme trainee (F1 and F2) doctors. Despite the advantages of TEL, learning behaviours may be exhibited that are not desired by system developers or educators. The aim of this evaluation was to investigate how learne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brooks, Hannah L., Pontefract, Sarah K., Hodson, James, Blackwell, Nicholas, Hughes, Elizabeth, Marriott, John F., Coleman, Jamie J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4855751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27142695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0651-z
_version_ 1782430405939429376
author Brooks, Hannah L.
Pontefract, Sarah K.
Hodson, James
Blackwell, Nicholas
Hughes, Elizabeth
Marriott, John F.
Coleman, Jamie J.
author_facet Brooks, Hannah L.
Pontefract, Sarah K.
Hodson, James
Blackwell, Nicholas
Hughes, Elizabeth
Marriott, John F.
Coleman, Jamie J.
author_sort Brooks, Hannah L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Technology-Enhanced Learning (TEL) can be used to educate Foundation Programme trainee (F1 and F2) doctors. Despite the advantages of TEL, learning behaviours may be exhibited that are not desired by system developers or educators. The aim of this evaluation was to investigate how learner behaviours (e.g. time spent on task) were affected by temporal (e.g. time of year), module (e.g. word count), and individual (e.g. knowledge) factors for 16 mandatory TEL modules related to prescribing and therapeutics. METHODS: Data were extracted from the SCRIPT e-Learning platform for first year Foundation trainee (F1) doctors in the Health Education England’s West Midland region from 1(st) August 2013 to 5(th) August 2014. Generalised Estimating Equation models were used to examine the relationship between time taken to complete modules, date modules were completed, pre- and post-test scores, and module factors. RESULTS: Over the time period examined, 688 F1 doctors interacted with the 16 compulsory modules 10,255 times. The geometric mean time taken to complete a module was 28.9 min (95 % Confidence Interval: 28.4–29.5) and 1,075 (10.5 %) modules were completed in less than 10 min. In February and June (prior to F1 progression reviews) peaks occurred in the number of modules completed and troughs in the time taken. Most modules were completed, and the greatest amount of time was spent on the learning on a Sunday. More time was taken by those doctors with greater pre-test scores and those with larger improvements in test scores. CONCLUSIONS: Foundation trainees are exhibiting unintended learning behaviours in this TEL environment, which may be attributed to several factors. These findings can help guide future developments of this TEL programme and the integration of other TEL programmes into curricula by raising awareness of potential behavioural issues that may arise. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0651-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4855751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48557512016-05-05 An evaluation of UK foundation trainee doctors’ learning behaviours in a technology-enhanced learning environment Brooks, Hannah L. Pontefract, Sarah K. Hodson, James Blackwell, Nicholas Hughes, Elizabeth Marriott, John F. Coleman, Jamie J. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Technology-Enhanced Learning (TEL) can be used to educate Foundation Programme trainee (F1 and F2) doctors. Despite the advantages of TEL, learning behaviours may be exhibited that are not desired by system developers or educators. The aim of this evaluation was to investigate how learner behaviours (e.g. time spent on task) were affected by temporal (e.g. time of year), module (e.g. word count), and individual (e.g. knowledge) factors for 16 mandatory TEL modules related to prescribing and therapeutics. METHODS: Data were extracted from the SCRIPT e-Learning platform for first year Foundation trainee (F1) doctors in the Health Education England’s West Midland region from 1(st) August 2013 to 5(th) August 2014. Generalised Estimating Equation models were used to examine the relationship between time taken to complete modules, date modules were completed, pre- and post-test scores, and module factors. RESULTS: Over the time period examined, 688 F1 doctors interacted with the 16 compulsory modules 10,255 times. The geometric mean time taken to complete a module was 28.9 min (95 % Confidence Interval: 28.4–29.5) and 1,075 (10.5 %) modules were completed in less than 10 min. In February and June (prior to F1 progression reviews) peaks occurred in the number of modules completed and troughs in the time taken. Most modules were completed, and the greatest amount of time was spent on the learning on a Sunday. More time was taken by those doctors with greater pre-test scores and those with larger improvements in test scores. CONCLUSIONS: Foundation trainees are exhibiting unintended learning behaviours in this TEL environment, which may be attributed to several factors. These findings can help guide future developments of this TEL programme and the integration of other TEL programmes into curricula by raising awareness of potential behavioural issues that may arise. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0651-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4855751/ /pubmed/27142695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0651-z Text en © Brooks et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brooks, Hannah L.
Pontefract, Sarah K.
Hodson, James
Blackwell, Nicholas
Hughes, Elizabeth
Marriott, John F.
Coleman, Jamie J.
An evaluation of UK foundation trainee doctors’ learning behaviours in a technology-enhanced learning environment
title An evaluation of UK foundation trainee doctors’ learning behaviours in a technology-enhanced learning environment
title_full An evaluation of UK foundation trainee doctors’ learning behaviours in a technology-enhanced learning environment
title_fullStr An evaluation of UK foundation trainee doctors’ learning behaviours in a technology-enhanced learning environment
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of UK foundation trainee doctors’ learning behaviours in a technology-enhanced learning environment
title_short An evaluation of UK foundation trainee doctors’ learning behaviours in a technology-enhanced learning environment
title_sort evaluation of uk foundation trainee doctors’ learning behaviours in a technology-enhanced learning environment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4855751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27142695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0651-z
work_keys_str_mv AT brookshannahl anevaluationofukfoundationtraineedoctorslearningbehavioursinatechnologyenhancedlearningenvironment
AT pontefractsarahk anevaluationofukfoundationtraineedoctorslearningbehavioursinatechnologyenhancedlearningenvironment
AT hodsonjames anevaluationofukfoundationtraineedoctorslearningbehavioursinatechnologyenhancedlearningenvironment
AT blackwellnicholas anevaluationofukfoundationtraineedoctorslearningbehavioursinatechnologyenhancedlearningenvironment
AT hugheselizabeth anevaluationofukfoundationtraineedoctorslearningbehavioursinatechnologyenhancedlearningenvironment
AT marriottjohnf anevaluationofukfoundationtraineedoctorslearningbehavioursinatechnologyenhancedlearningenvironment
AT colemanjamiej anevaluationofukfoundationtraineedoctorslearningbehavioursinatechnologyenhancedlearningenvironment
AT brookshannahl evaluationofukfoundationtraineedoctorslearningbehavioursinatechnologyenhancedlearningenvironment
AT pontefractsarahk evaluationofukfoundationtraineedoctorslearningbehavioursinatechnologyenhancedlearningenvironment
AT hodsonjames evaluationofukfoundationtraineedoctorslearningbehavioursinatechnologyenhancedlearningenvironment
AT blackwellnicholas evaluationofukfoundationtraineedoctorslearningbehavioursinatechnologyenhancedlearningenvironment
AT hugheselizabeth evaluationofukfoundationtraineedoctorslearningbehavioursinatechnologyenhancedlearningenvironment
AT marriottjohnf evaluationofukfoundationtraineedoctorslearningbehavioursinatechnologyenhancedlearningenvironment
AT colemanjamiej evaluationofukfoundationtraineedoctorslearningbehavioursinatechnologyenhancedlearningenvironment