Cargando…
Mechanistic and quantitative insight into cell surface targeted molecular imaging agent design
Molecular imaging agent design involves simultaneously optimizing multiple probe properties. While several desired characteristics are straightforward, including high affinity and low non-specific background signal, in practice there are quantitative trade-offs between these properties. These includ...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4857130/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27147293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep25424 |
_version_ | 1782430605086031872 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Liang Bhatnagar, Sumit Deschenes, Emily Thurber, Greg M. |
author_facet | Zhang, Liang Bhatnagar, Sumit Deschenes, Emily Thurber, Greg M. |
author_sort | Zhang, Liang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Molecular imaging agent design involves simultaneously optimizing multiple probe properties. While several desired characteristics are straightforward, including high affinity and low non-specific background signal, in practice there are quantitative trade-offs between these properties. These include plasma clearance, where fast clearance lowers background signal but can reduce target uptake, and binding, where high affinity compounds sometimes suffer from lower stability or increased non-specific interactions. Further complicating probe development, many of the optimal parameters vary depending on both target tissue and imaging agent properties, making empirical approaches or previous experience difficult to translate. Here, we focus on low molecular weight compounds targeting extracellular receptors, which have some of the highest contrast values for imaging agents. We use a mechanistic approach to provide a quantitative framework for weighing trade-offs between molecules. Our results show that specific target uptake is well-described by quantitative simulations for a variety of targeting agents, whereas non-specific background signal is more difficult to predict. Two in vitro experimental methods for estimating background signal in vivo are compared – non-specific cellular uptake and plasma protein binding. Together, these data provide a quantitative method to guide probe design and focus animal work for more cost-effective and time-efficient development of molecular imaging agents. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4857130 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48571302016-05-19 Mechanistic and quantitative insight into cell surface targeted molecular imaging agent design Zhang, Liang Bhatnagar, Sumit Deschenes, Emily Thurber, Greg M. Sci Rep Article Molecular imaging agent design involves simultaneously optimizing multiple probe properties. While several desired characteristics are straightforward, including high affinity and low non-specific background signal, in practice there are quantitative trade-offs between these properties. These include plasma clearance, where fast clearance lowers background signal but can reduce target uptake, and binding, where high affinity compounds sometimes suffer from lower stability or increased non-specific interactions. Further complicating probe development, many of the optimal parameters vary depending on both target tissue and imaging agent properties, making empirical approaches or previous experience difficult to translate. Here, we focus on low molecular weight compounds targeting extracellular receptors, which have some of the highest contrast values for imaging agents. We use a mechanistic approach to provide a quantitative framework for weighing trade-offs between molecules. Our results show that specific target uptake is well-described by quantitative simulations for a variety of targeting agents, whereas non-specific background signal is more difficult to predict. Two in vitro experimental methods for estimating background signal in vivo are compared – non-specific cellular uptake and plasma protein binding. Together, these data provide a quantitative method to guide probe design and focus animal work for more cost-effective and time-efficient development of molecular imaging agents. Nature Publishing Group 2016-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4857130/ /pubmed/27147293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep25424 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Zhang, Liang Bhatnagar, Sumit Deschenes, Emily Thurber, Greg M. Mechanistic and quantitative insight into cell surface targeted molecular imaging agent design |
title | Mechanistic and quantitative insight into cell surface targeted molecular imaging agent design |
title_full | Mechanistic and quantitative insight into cell surface targeted molecular imaging agent design |
title_fullStr | Mechanistic and quantitative insight into cell surface targeted molecular imaging agent design |
title_full_unstemmed | Mechanistic and quantitative insight into cell surface targeted molecular imaging agent design |
title_short | Mechanistic and quantitative insight into cell surface targeted molecular imaging agent design |
title_sort | mechanistic and quantitative insight into cell surface targeted molecular imaging agent design |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4857130/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27147293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep25424 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangliang mechanisticandquantitativeinsightintocellsurfacetargetedmolecularimagingagentdesign AT bhatnagarsumit mechanisticandquantitativeinsightintocellsurfacetargetedmolecularimagingagentdesign AT deschenesemily mechanisticandquantitativeinsightintocellsurfacetargetedmolecularimagingagentdesign AT thurbergregm mechanisticandquantitativeinsightintocellsurfacetargetedmolecularimagingagentdesign |