Cargando…

Evaluation of Multiple Immunoassay Technology Platforms to Select the Anti-Drug Antibody Assay Exhibiting the Most Appropriate Drug and Target Tolerance

The aim of this study was, at the assay development stage and thus with an appropriate degree of rigor, to select the most appropriate technology platform and sample pretreatment procedure for a clinical ADA assay. Thus, ELISA, MSD, Gyrolab, and AlphaLISA immunoassay platforms were evaluated in asso...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Collet-Brose, Justine, Couble, Pierre-Jean, Deehan, Maureen R., Nelson, Robert J., Ferlin, Walter G., Lory, Sabrina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4868908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27243038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5069678
_version_ 1782432226099593216
author Collet-Brose, Justine
Couble, Pierre-Jean
Deehan, Maureen R.
Nelson, Robert J.
Ferlin, Walter G.
Lory, Sabrina
author_facet Collet-Brose, Justine
Couble, Pierre-Jean
Deehan, Maureen R.
Nelson, Robert J.
Ferlin, Walter G.
Lory, Sabrina
author_sort Collet-Brose, Justine
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was, at the assay development stage and thus with an appropriate degree of rigor, to select the most appropriate technology platform and sample pretreatment procedure for a clinical ADA assay. Thus, ELISA, MSD, Gyrolab, and AlphaLISA immunoassay platforms were evaluated in association with target depletion and acid dissociation sample pretreatment steps. An acid dissociation step successfully improved the drug tolerance for all 4 technology platforms and the required drug tolerance was achieved with the Gyrolab and MSD platforms. The target tolerance was shown to be better for the ELISA format, where an acid dissociation treatment step alone was sufficient to achieve the desired target tolerance. However, inclusion of a target depletion step in conjunction with the acid treatment raised the target tolerance to the desired level for all of the technologies. A higher sensitivity was observed for the MSD and Gyrolab assays and the ELISA, MSD, and Gyrolab all displayed acceptable interdonor variability. This study highlights the usefulness of evaluating the performance of different assay platforms at an early stage in the assay development process to aid in the selection of the best fit-for-purpose technology platform and sample pretreatment steps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4868908
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48689082016-05-30 Evaluation of Multiple Immunoassay Technology Platforms to Select the Anti-Drug Antibody Assay Exhibiting the Most Appropriate Drug and Target Tolerance Collet-Brose, Justine Couble, Pierre-Jean Deehan, Maureen R. Nelson, Robert J. Ferlin, Walter G. Lory, Sabrina J Immunol Res Research Article The aim of this study was, at the assay development stage and thus with an appropriate degree of rigor, to select the most appropriate technology platform and sample pretreatment procedure for a clinical ADA assay. Thus, ELISA, MSD, Gyrolab, and AlphaLISA immunoassay platforms were evaluated in association with target depletion and acid dissociation sample pretreatment steps. An acid dissociation step successfully improved the drug tolerance for all 4 technology platforms and the required drug tolerance was achieved with the Gyrolab and MSD platforms. The target tolerance was shown to be better for the ELISA format, where an acid dissociation treatment step alone was sufficient to achieve the desired target tolerance. However, inclusion of a target depletion step in conjunction with the acid treatment raised the target tolerance to the desired level for all of the technologies. A higher sensitivity was observed for the MSD and Gyrolab assays and the ELISA, MSD, and Gyrolab all displayed acceptable interdonor variability. This study highlights the usefulness of evaluating the performance of different assay platforms at an early stage in the assay development process to aid in the selection of the best fit-for-purpose technology platform and sample pretreatment steps. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4868908/ /pubmed/27243038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5069678 Text en Copyright © 2016 Justine Collet-Brose et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Collet-Brose, Justine
Couble, Pierre-Jean
Deehan, Maureen R.
Nelson, Robert J.
Ferlin, Walter G.
Lory, Sabrina
Evaluation of Multiple Immunoassay Technology Platforms to Select the Anti-Drug Antibody Assay Exhibiting the Most Appropriate Drug and Target Tolerance
title Evaluation of Multiple Immunoassay Technology Platforms to Select the Anti-Drug Antibody Assay Exhibiting the Most Appropriate Drug and Target Tolerance
title_full Evaluation of Multiple Immunoassay Technology Platforms to Select the Anti-Drug Antibody Assay Exhibiting the Most Appropriate Drug and Target Tolerance
title_fullStr Evaluation of Multiple Immunoassay Technology Platforms to Select the Anti-Drug Antibody Assay Exhibiting the Most Appropriate Drug and Target Tolerance
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Multiple Immunoassay Technology Platforms to Select the Anti-Drug Antibody Assay Exhibiting the Most Appropriate Drug and Target Tolerance
title_short Evaluation of Multiple Immunoassay Technology Platforms to Select the Anti-Drug Antibody Assay Exhibiting the Most Appropriate Drug and Target Tolerance
title_sort evaluation of multiple immunoassay technology platforms to select the anti-drug antibody assay exhibiting the most appropriate drug and target tolerance
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4868908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27243038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5069678
work_keys_str_mv AT colletbrosejustine evaluationofmultipleimmunoassaytechnologyplatformstoselecttheantidrugantibodyassayexhibitingthemostappropriatedrugandtargettolerance
AT coublepierrejean evaluationofmultipleimmunoassaytechnologyplatformstoselecttheantidrugantibodyassayexhibitingthemostappropriatedrugandtargettolerance
AT deehanmaureenr evaluationofmultipleimmunoassaytechnologyplatformstoselecttheantidrugantibodyassayexhibitingthemostappropriatedrugandtargettolerance
AT nelsonrobertj evaluationofmultipleimmunoassaytechnologyplatformstoselecttheantidrugantibodyassayexhibitingthemostappropriatedrugandtargettolerance
AT ferlinwalterg evaluationofmultipleimmunoassaytechnologyplatformstoselecttheantidrugantibodyassayexhibitingthemostappropriatedrugandtargettolerance
AT lorysabrina evaluationofmultipleimmunoassaytechnologyplatformstoselecttheantidrugantibodyassayexhibitingthemostappropriatedrugandtargettolerance