Cargando…

Comparison of liver oncogenic potential among human RAS isoforms

Mutation in one of three RAS genes (i.e., HRAS, KRAS, and NRAS) leading to constitutive activation of RAS signaling pathways is considered a key oncogenic event in human carcinogenesis. Whether activated RAS isoforms possess different oncogenic potentials remains an unresolved question. Here, we com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chung, Sook In, Moon, Hyuk, Ju, Hye-Lim, Kim, Dae Yeong, Cho, Kyung Joo, Ribback, Silvia, Dombrowski, Frank, Calvisi, Diego F., Ro, Simon Weonsang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4872791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26799184
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.6931
_version_ 1782432788706754560
author Chung, Sook In
Moon, Hyuk
Ju, Hye-Lim
Kim, Dae Yeong
Cho, Kyung Joo
Ribback, Silvia
Dombrowski, Frank
Calvisi, Diego F.
Ro, Simon Weonsang
author_facet Chung, Sook In
Moon, Hyuk
Ju, Hye-Lim
Kim, Dae Yeong
Cho, Kyung Joo
Ribback, Silvia
Dombrowski, Frank
Calvisi, Diego F.
Ro, Simon Weonsang
author_sort Chung, Sook In
collection PubMed
description Mutation in one of three RAS genes (i.e., HRAS, KRAS, and NRAS) leading to constitutive activation of RAS signaling pathways is considered a key oncogenic event in human carcinogenesis. Whether activated RAS isoforms possess different oncogenic potentials remains an unresolved question. Here, we compared oncogenic properties among RAS isoforms using liver-specific transgenesis in mice. Hydrodynamic transfection was performed using transposons expressing short hairpin RNA downregulating p53 and an activated RAS isoform, and livers were harvested at 23 days after gene delivery. No differences were found in the hepatocarcinogenic potential among RAS isoforms, as determined by both gross examination of livers and liver weight per body weight ratio (LW/BW) of mice expressing HRAS(Q61L), KRAS4B(G12V) and NRAS(Q61K). However, the tumorigenic potential differed significantly between KRAS splicing variants. The LW/BW ratio in KRAS4A(G12V) mice was significantly lower than in KRAS4B(G12V) mice (p < 0.001), and KRAS4A(G12V) mice lived significantly longer than KRRAS4B(G12V) mice (p < 0.0001). Notably, tumors from KRAS4A(G12V) mice displayed higher expression of the p16(INK4A) tumor suppressor when compared with KRAS4B(G12V) tumors. Forced overexpression of p16(INK4A) significantly reduced tumor growth in KRAS4B(G12V) mice, suggesting that upregulation of p16(INK4A) by KRAS4A(G12V) presumably delays tumor development driven by the latter oncogene.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4872791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48727912016-05-25 Comparison of liver oncogenic potential among human RAS isoforms Chung, Sook In Moon, Hyuk Ju, Hye-Lim Kim, Dae Yeong Cho, Kyung Joo Ribback, Silvia Dombrowski, Frank Calvisi, Diego F. Ro, Simon Weonsang Oncotarget Research Paper Mutation in one of three RAS genes (i.e., HRAS, KRAS, and NRAS) leading to constitutive activation of RAS signaling pathways is considered a key oncogenic event in human carcinogenesis. Whether activated RAS isoforms possess different oncogenic potentials remains an unresolved question. Here, we compared oncogenic properties among RAS isoforms using liver-specific transgenesis in mice. Hydrodynamic transfection was performed using transposons expressing short hairpin RNA downregulating p53 and an activated RAS isoform, and livers were harvested at 23 days after gene delivery. No differences were found in the hepatocarcinogenic potential among RAS isoforms, as determined by both gross examination of livers and liver weight per body weight ratio (LW/BW) of mice expressing HRAS(Q61L), KRAS4B(G12V) and NRAS(Q61K). However, the tumorigenic potential differed significantly between KRAS splicing variants. The LW/BW ratio in KRAS4A(G12V) mice was significantly lower than in KRAS4B(G12V) mice (p < 0.001), and KRAS4A(G12V) mice lived significantly longer than KRRAS4B(G12V) mice (p < 0.0001). Notably, tumors from KRAS4A(G12V) mice displayed higher expression of the p16(INK4A) tumor suppressor when compared with KRAS4B(G12V) tumors. Forced overexpression of p16(INK4A) significantly reduced tumor growth in KRAS4B(G12V) mice, suggesting that upregulation of p16(INK4A) by KRAS4A(G12V) presumably delays tumor development driven by the latter oncogene. Impact Journals LLC 2016-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4872791/ /pubmed/26799184 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.6931 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Chung et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Chung, Sook In
Moon, Hyuk
Ju, Hye-Lim
Kim, Dae Yeong
Cho, Kyung Joo
Ribback, Silvia
Dombrowski, Frank
Calvisi, Diego F.
Ro, Simon Weonsang
Comparison of liver oncogenic potential among human RAS isoforms
title Comparison of liver oncogenic potential among human RAS isoforms
title_full Comparison of liver oncogenic potential among human RAS isoforms
title_fullStr Comparison of liver oncogenic potential among human RAS isoforms
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of liver oncogenic potential among human RAS isoforms
title_short Comparison of liver oncogenic potential among human RAS isoforms
title_sort comparison of liver oncogenic potential among human ras isoforms
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4872791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26799184
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.6931
work_keys_str_mv AT chungsookin comparisonofliveroncogenicpotentialamonghumanrasisoforms
AT moonhyuk comparisonofliveroncogenicpotentialamonghumanrasisoforms
AT juhyelim comparisonofliveroncogenicpotentialamonghumanrasisoforms
AT kimdaeyeong comparisonofliveroncogenicpotentialamonghumanrasisoforms
AT chokyungjoo comparisonofliveroncogenicpotentialamonghumanrasisoforms
AT ribbacksilvia comparisonofliveroncogenicpotentialamonghumanrasisoforms
AT dombrowskifrank comparisonofliveroncogenicpotentialamonghumanrasisoforms
AT calvisidiegof comparisonofliveroncogenicpotentialamonghumanrasisoforms
AT rosimonweonsang comparisonofliveroncogenicpotentialamonghumanrasisoforms