Cargando…
Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage
Current genome-editing technologies introduce double-stranded (ds) DNA breaks at a target locus as the first step to gene correction.(1,2) Although most genetic diseases arise from point mutations, current approaches to point mutation correction are inefficient and typically induce an abundance of r...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4873371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27096365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature17946 |
_version_ | 1782432881200594944 |
---|---|
author | Komor, Alexis C. Kim, Yongjoo B. Packer, Michael S. Zuris, John A. Liu, David R. |
author_facet | Komor, Alexis C. Kim, Yongjoo B. Packer, Michael S. Zuris, John A. Liu, David R. |
author_sort | Komor, Alexis C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Current genome-editing technologies introduce double-stranded (ds) DNA breaks at a target locus as the first step to gene correction.(1,2) Although most genetic diseases arise from point mutations, current approaches to point mutation correction are inefficient and typically induce an abundance of random insertions and deletions (indels) at the target locus from the cellular response to dsDNA breaks.(1,2) Here we report the development of base editing, a new approach to genome editing that enables the direct, irreversible conversion of one target DNA base into another in a programmable manner, without requiring dsDNA backbone cleavage or a donor template. We engineered fusions of CRISPR/Cas9 and a cytidine deaminase enzyme that retain the ability to be programmed with a guide RNA, do not induce dsDNA breaks, and mediate the direct conversion of cytidine to uridine, thereby effecting a C→T (or G→A) substitution. The resulting “base editors” convert cytidines within a window of approximately five nucleotides (nt), and can efficiently correct a variety of point mutations relevant to human disease. In four transformed human and murine cell lines, second- and third-generation base editors that fuse uracil glycosylase inhibitor (UGI), and that use a Cas9 nickase targeting the non-edited strand, manipulate the cellular DNA repair response to favor desired base-editing outcomes, resulting in permanent correction of ∼15-75% of total cellular DNA with minimal (typically ≤ 1%) indel formation. Base editing expands the scope and efficiency of genome editing of point mutations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4873371 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48733712016-10-20 Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage Komor, Alexis C. Kim, Yongjoo B. Packer, Michael S. Zuris, John A. Liu, David R. Nature Article Current genome-editing technologies introduce double-stranded (ds) DNA breaks at a target locus as the first step to gene correction.(1,2) Although most genetic diseases arise from point mutations, current approaches to point mutation correction are inefficient and typically induce an abundance of random insertions and deletions (indels) at the target locus from the cellular response to dsDNA breaks.(1,2) Here we report the development of base editing, a new approach to genome editing that enables the direct, irreversible conversion of one target DNA base into another in a programmable manner, without requiring dsDNA backbone cleavage or a donor template. We engineered fusions of CRISPR/Cas9 and a cytidine deaminase enzyme that retain the ability to be programmed with a guide RNA, do not induce dsDNA breaks, and mediate the direct conversion of cytidine to uridine, thereby effecting a C→T (or G→A) substitution. The resulting “base editors” convert cytidines within a window of approximately five nucleotides (nt), and can efficiently correct a variety of point mutations relevant to human disease. In four transformed human and murine cell lines, second- and third-generation base editors that fuse uracil glycosylase inhibitor (UGI), and that use a Cas9 nickase targeting the non-edited strand, manipulate the cellular DNA repair response to favor desired base-editing outcomes, resulting in permanent correction of ∼15-75% of total cellular DNA with minimal (typically ≤ 1%) indel formation. Base editing expands the scope and efficiency of genome editing of point mutations. 2016-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4873371/ /pubmed/27096365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature17946 Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints (http://www.nature.com/reprints) . |
spellingShingle | Article Komor, Alexis C. Kim, Yongjoo B. Packer, Michael S. Zuris, John A. Liu, David R. Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage |
title | Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage |
title_full | Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage |
title_fullStr | Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage |
title_full_unstemmed | Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage |
title_short | Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage |
title_sort | programmable editing of a target base in genomic dna without double-stranded dna cleavage |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4873371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27096365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature17946 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT komoralexisc programmableeditingofatargetbaseingenomicdnawithoutdoublestrandeddnacleavage AT kimyongjoob programmableeditingofatargetbaseingenomicdnawithoutdoublestrandeddnacleavage AT packermichaels programmableeditingofatargetbaseingenomicdnawithoutdoublestrandeddnacleavage AT zurisjohna programmableeditingofatargetbaseingenomicdnawithoutdoublestrandeddnacleavage AT liudavidr programmableeditingofatargetbaseingenomicdnawithoutdoublestrandeddnacleavage |