Cargando…

Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage

Current genome-editing technologies introduce double-stranded (ds) DNA breaks at a target locus as the first step to gene correction.(1,2) Although most genetic diseases arise from point mutations, current approaches to point mutation correction are inefficient and typically induce an abundance of r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Komor, Alexis C., Kim, Yongjoo B., Packer, Michael S., Zuris, John A., Liu, David R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4873371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27096365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature17946
_version_ 1782432881200594944
author Komor, Alexis C.
Kim, Yongjoo B.
Packer, Michael S.
Zuris, John A.
Liu, David R.
author_facet Komor, Alexis C.
Kim, Yongjoo B.
Packer, Michael S.
Zuris, John A.
Liu, David R.
author_sort Komor, Alexis C.
collection PubMed
description Current genome-editing technologies introduce double-stranded (ds) DNA breaks at a target locus as the first step to gene correction.(1,2) Although most genetic diseases arise from point mutations, current approaches to point mutation correction are inefficient and typically induce an abundance of random insertions and deletions (indels) at the target locus from the cellular response to dsDNA breaks.(1,2) Here we report the development of base editing, a new approach to genome editing that enables the direct, irreversible conversion of one target DNA base into another in a programmable manner, without requiring dsDNA backbone cleavage or a donor template. We engineered fusions of CRISPR/Cas9 and a cytidine deaminase enzyme that retain the ability to be programmed with a guide RNA, do not induce dsDNA breaks, and mediate the direct conversion of cytidine to uridine, thereby effecting a C→T (or G→A) substitution. The resulting “base editors” convert cytidines within a window of approximately five nucleotides (nt), and can efficiently correct a variety of point mutations relevant to human disease. In four transformed human and murine cell lines, second- and third-generation base editors that fuse uracil glycosylase inhibitor (UGI), and that use a Cas9 nickase targeting the non-edited strand, manipulate the cellular DNA repair response to favor desired base-editing outcomes, resulting in permanent correction of ∼15-75% of total cellular DNA with minimal (typically ≤ 1%) indel formation. Base editing expands the scope and efficiency of genome editing of point mutations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4873371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48733712016-10-20 Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage Komor, Alexis C. Kim, Yongjoo B. Packer, Michael S. Zuris, John A. Liu, David R. Nature Article Current genome-editing technologies introduce double-stranded (ds) DNA breaks at a target locus as the first step to gene correction.(1,2) Although most genetic diseases arise from point mutations, current approaches to point mutation correction are inefficient and typically induce an abundance of random insertions and deletions (indels) at the target locus from the cellular response to dsDNA breaks.(1,2) Here we report the development of base editing, a new approach to genome editing that enables the direct, irreversible conversion of one target DNA base into another in a programmable manner, without requiring dsDNA backbone cleavage or a donor template. We engineered fusions of CRISPR/Cas9 and a cytidine deaminase enzyme that retain the ability to be programmed with a guide RNA, do not induce dsDNA breaks, and mediate the direct conversion of cytidine to uridine, thereby effecting a C→T (or G→A) substitution. The resulting “base editors” convert cytidines within a window of approximately five nucleotides (nt), and can efficiently correct a variety of point mutations relevant to human disease. In four transformed human and murine cell lines, second- and third-generation base editors that fuse uracil glycosylase inhibitor (UGI), and that use a Cas9 nickase targeting the non-edited strand, manipulate the cellular DNA repair response to favor desired base-editing outcomes, resulting in permanent correction of ∼15-75% of total cellular DNA with minimal (typically ≤ 1%) indel formation. Base editing expands the scope and efficiency of genome editing of point mutations. 2016-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4873371/ /pubmed/27096365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature17946 Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints (http://www.nature.com/reprints) .
spellingShingle Article
Komor, Alexis C.
Kim, Yongjoo B.
Packer, Michael S.
Zuris, John A.
Liu, David R.
Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage
title Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage
title_full Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage
title_fullStr Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage
title_full_unstemmed Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage
title_short Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage
title_sort programmable editing of a target base in genomic dna without double-stranded dna cleavage
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4873371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27096365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature17946
work_keys_str_mv AT komoralexisc programmableeditingofatargetbaseingenomicdnawithoutdoublestrandeddnacleavage
AT kimyongjoob programmableeditingofatargetbaseingenomicdnawithoutdoublestrandeddnacleavage
AT packermichaels programmableeditingofatargetbaseingenomicdnawithoutdoublestrandeddnacleavage
AT zurisjohna programmableeditingofatargetbaseingenomicdnawithoutdoublestrandeddnacleavage
AT liudavidr programmableeditingofatargetbaseingenomicdnawithoutdoublestrandeddnacleavage