Cargando…
Comparison of next generation sequencing, SNaPshot assay and real-time polymerase chain reaction for lung adenocarcinoma EGFR mutation assessment
BACKGROUND: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status assessment has become increasingly important given the significant impact of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in lung cancer management. Our aim was to compare real life operational characteristics for three EGFR mutation assays - two...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4877937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27215400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-016-0250-0 |
_version_ | 1782433481227239424 |
---|---|
author | Cernomaz, Andrei-Tudor Macovei, Ina Iuliana Pavel, Ionut Grigoriu, Carmen Marinca, Mihai Baty, Florent Peter, Simona Zonda, Radu Brutsche, Martin Grigoriu, Bogdan- Dragos |
author_facet | Cernomaz, Andrei-Tudor Macovei, Ina Iuliana Pavel, Ionut Grigoriu, Carmen Marinca, Mihai Baty, Florent Peter, Simona Zonda, Radu Brutsche, Martin Grigoriu, Bogdan- Dragos |
author_sort | Cernomaz, Andrei-Tudor |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status assessment has become increasingly important given the significant impact of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in lung cancer management. Our aim was to compare real life operational characteristics for three EGFR mutation assays - two targeted approaches and a next generation sequencing (NGS) technique. METHODS: EGFR mutation status was assessed for lung adenocarcinoma samples (formalin fixed- paraffin embedded samples) using qPCR, SNaPshot and NGS (Ion Torrent™) techniques. RESULTS: A total of 15 high clinical significance mutations were identified by at least one technique from the total of 64 samples. All mutations were identified by the TaqMan qPCR technique while SNaPshot in conjunction with fragment analysis identified 11 EGFR mutations. The NGS approach followed by an automatic analysis using the default calling parameters identified 10 mutations from the SNaPshot/qPCR panel and other three insertions, five point mutations and 58 silent variants; manual data review identified all 15 high significance mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Performance was similar for high tumor content samples but careful data analysis and post hoc variant calling filter alterations were necessary in order to obtain robust results from low tumor content samples by NGS. NGS is able to generate a comprehensive mutational profile albeit at a higher cost and workload. Result interpretation should take into account not only general run parameters such as mean read depth but also relative coverage and read distribution; currently there is an acute need to define firm recommendations/standards concerning NGS data interpretation and quality control. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4877937 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48779372016-05-25 Comparison of next generation sequencing, SNaPshot assay and real-time polymerase chain reaction for lung adenocarcinoma EGFR mutation assessment Cernomaz, Andrei-Tudor Macovei, Ina Iuliana Pavel, Ionut Grigoriu, Carmen Marinca, Mihai Baty, Florent Peter, Simona Zonda, Radu Brutsche, Martin Grigoriu, Bogdan- Dragos BMC Pulm Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status assessment has become increasingly important given the significant impact of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in lung cancer management. Our aim was to compare real life operational characteristics for three EGFR mutation assays - two targeted approaches and a next generation sequencing (NGS) technique. METHODS: EGFR mutation status was assessed for lung adenocarcinoma samples (formalin fixed- paraffin embedded samples) using qPCR, SNaPshot and NGS (Ion Torrent™) techniques. RESULTS: A total of 15 high clinical significance mutations were identified by at least one technique from the total of 64 samples. All mutations were identified by the TaqMan qPCR technique while SNaPshot in conjunction with fragment analysis identified 11 EGFR mutations. The NGS approach followed by an automatic analysis using the default calling parameters identified 10 mutations from the SNaPshot/qPCR panel and other three insertions, five point mutations and 58 silent variants; manual data review identified all 15 high significance mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Performance was similar for high tumor content samples but careful data analysis and post hoc variant calling filter alterations were necessary in order to obtain robust results from low tumor content samples by NGS. NGS is able to generate a comprehensive mutational profile albeit at a higher cost and workload. Result interpretation should take into account not only general run parameters such as mean read depth but also relative coverage and read distribution; currently there is an acute need to define firm recommendations/standards concerning NGS data interpretation and quality control. BioMed Central 2016-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4877937/ /pubmed/27215400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-016-0250-0 Text en © Cernomaz et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cernomaz, Andrei-Tudor Macovei, Ina Iuliana Pavel, Ionut Grigoriu, Carmen Marinca, Mihai Baty, Florent Peter, Simona Zonda, Radu Brutsche, Martin Grigoriu, Bogdan- Dragos Comparison of next generation sequencing, SNaPshot assay and real-time polymerase chain reaction for lung adenocarcinoma EGFR mutation assessment |
title | Comparison of next generation sequencing, SNaPshot assay and real-time polymerase chain reaction for lung adenocarcinoma EGFR mutation assessment |
title_full | Comparison of next generation sequencing, SNaPshot assay and real-time polymerase chain reaction for lung adenocarcinoma EGFR mutation assessment |
title_fullStr | Comparison of next generation sequencing, SNaPshot assay and real-time polymerase chain reaction for lung adenocarcinoma EGFR mutation assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of next generation sequencing, SNaPshot assay and real-time polymerase chain reaction for lung adenocarcinoma EGFR mutation assessment |
title_short | Comparison of next generation sequencing, SNaPshot assay and real-time polymerase chain reaction for lung adenocarcinoma EGFR mutation assessment |
title_sort | comparison of next generation sequencing, snapshot assay and real-time polymerase chain reaction for lung adenocarcinoma egfr mutation assessment |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4877937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27215400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-016-0250-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cernomazandreitudor comparisonofnextgenerationsequencingsnapshotassayandrealtimepolymerasechainreactionforlungadenocarcinomaegfrmutationassessment AT macoveiinaiuliana comparisonofnextgenerationsequencingsnapshotassayandrealtimepolymerasechainreactionforlungadenocarcinomaegfrmutationassessment AT pavelionut comparisonofnextgenerationsequencingsnapshotassayandrealtimepolymerasechainreactionforlungadenocarcinomaegfrmutationassessment AT grigoriucarmen comparisonofnextgenerationsequencingsnapshotassayandrealtimepolymerasechainreactionforlungadenocarcinomaegfrmutationassessment AT marincamihai comparisonofnextgenerationsequencingsnapshotassayandrealtimepolymerasechainreactionforlungadenocarcinomaegfrmutationassessment AT batyflorent comparisonofnextgenerationsequencingsnapshotassayandrealtimepolymerasechainreactionforlungadenocarcinomaegfrmutationassessment AT petersimona comparisonofnextgenerationsequencingsnapshotassayandrealtimepolymerasechainreactionforlungadenocarcinomaegfrmutationassessment AT zondaradu comparisonofnextgenerationsequencingsnapshotassayandrealtimepolymerasechainreactionforlungadenocarcinomaegfrmutationassessment AT brutschemartin comparisonofnextgenerationsequencingsnapshotassayandrealtimepolymerasechainreactionforlungadenocarcinomaegfrmutationassessment AT grigoriubogdandragos comparisonofnextgenerationsequencingsnapshotassayandrealtimepolymerasechainreactionforlungadenocarcinomaegfrmutationassessment |