Cargando…

Novel Approach for Clinical Validation of the cobas KRAS Mutation Test in Advanced Colorectal Cancer

AIM: Our objective was to assess the performance of the cobas test versus comparators for KRAS mutation status and predicting clinical response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: mCRC samples from 398 patients from R...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Abha, Zhang, Guili, Aslam, Shagufta, Yu, Karen, Chee, Melody, Palma, John F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4879158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26984642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40291-016-0193-4
_version_ 1782433644765249536
author Sharma, Abha
Zhang, Guili
Aslam, Shagufta
Yu, Karen
Chee, Melody
Palma, John F.
author_facet Sharma, Abha
Zhang, Guili
Aslam, Shagufta
Yu, Karen
Chee, Melody
Palma, John F.
author_sort Sharma, Abha
collection PubMed
description AIM: Our objective was to assess the performance of the cobas test versus comparators for KRAS mutation status and predicting clinical response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: mCRC samples from 398 patients from Roche study NO16968 (XELOXA) and 82 supplemental samples were tested with the cobas(®) KRAS mutation test (cobas test), the therascreen(®) KRAS RGQ PCR kit test (therascreen test), and Sanger sequencing as the reference method for detecting mutations in codons 12/13. RESULTS: For 461 eligible samples, the cobas test, therascreen test, and sequencing had invalid results for 5.2, 10.8, and 2.6 % of specimens, respectively. Valid cobas and therascreen test results had similar KRAS mutation-positive rates (37.3 vs. 36.3 %, respectively); sequencing was 28.5 %. Positive and negative percent agreement (PPA/NPA) between the cobas test and sequencing was 96.9 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 92.2–98.8), and 88.7 % (95 % CI 84.7–91.8), respectively. PPA/NPA between the cobas and therascreen tests was 93.3 % (95 % CI 88.1–96.3) and 96.5 % (95 % CI 93.5–98.1), respectively. Bridging analysis from NCIC-CO.17 and NCT00113763 using the cobas test yielded modeled hazard ratios for overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) of 0.558 (95 % CI 0.422–0.752) and 0.413 (95 % CI 0.304–0.550), respectively, for cetuximab and 0.989 (95 % CI 0.778–1.299) and 0.471 (95 % CI 0.360–0.626), respectively, for panitumumab, demonstrating significant efficacy in the KRAS-negative population for PFS. CONCLUSION: The cobas test showed similar accuracy to the therascreen test for detecting KRAS mutations and could appropriately identify mCRC patients ineligible for anti-EGFR therapy as demonstrated by bridging analysis results. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40291-016-0193-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4879158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48791582016-06-21 Novel Approach for Clinical Validation of the cobas KRAS Mutation Test in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Sharma, Abha Zhang, Guili Aslam, Shagufta Yu, Karen Chee, Melody Palma, John F. Mol Diagn Ther Original Research Article AIM: Our objective was to assess the performance of the cobas test versus comparators for KRAS mutation status and predicting clinical response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: mCRC samples from 398 patients from Roche study NO16968 (XELOXA) and 82 supplemental samples were tested with the cobas(®) KRAS mutation test (cobas test), the therascreen(®) KRAS RGQ PCR kit test (therascreen test), and Sanger sequencing as the reference method for detecting mutations in codons 12/13. RESULTS: For 461 eligible samples, the cobas test, therascreen test, and sequencing had invalid results for 5.2, 10.8, and 2.6 % of specimens, respectively. Valid cobas and therascreen test results had similar KRAS mutation-positive rates (37.3 vs. 36.3 %, respectively); sequencing was 28.5 %. Positive and negative percent agreement (PPA/NPA) between the cobas test and sequencing was 96.9 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 92.2–98.8), and 88.7 % (95 % CI 84.7–91.8), respectively. PPA/NPA between the cobas and therascreen tests was 93.3 % (95 % CI 88.1–96.3) and 96.5 % (95 % CI 93.5–98.1), respectively. Bridging analysis from NCIC-CO.17 and NCT00113763 using the cobas test yielded modeled hazard ratios for overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) of 0.558 (95 % CI 0.422–0.752) and 0.413 (95 % CI 0.304–0.550), respectively, for cetuximab and 0.989 (95 % CI 0.778–1.299) and 0.471 (95 % CI 0.360–0.626), respectively, for panitumumab, demonstrating significant efficacy in the KRAS-negative population for PFS. CONCLUSION: The cobas test showed similar accuracy to the therascreen test for detecting KRAS mutations and could appropriately identify mCRC patients ineligible for anti-EGFR therapy as demonstrated by bridging analysis results. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40291-016-0193-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2016-03-16 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4879158/ /pubmed/26984642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40291-016-0193-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Sharma, Abha
Zhang, Guili
Aslam, Shagufta
Yu, Karen
Chee, Melody
Palma, John F.
Novel Approach for Clinical Validation of the cobas KRAS Mutation Test in Advanced Colorectal Cancer
title Novel Approach for Clinical Validation of the cobas KRAS Mutation Test in Advanced Colorectal Cancer
title_full Novel Approach for Clinical Validation of the cobas KRAS Mutation Test in Advanced Colorectal Cancer
title_fullStr Novel Approach for Clinical Validation of the cobas KRAS Mutation Test in Advanced Colorectal Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Novel Approach for Clinical Validation of the cobas KRAS Mutation Test in Advanced Colorectal Cancer
title_short Novel Approach for Clinical Validation of the cobas KRAS Mutation Test in Advanced Colorectal Cancer
title_sort novel approach for clinical validation of the cobas kras mutation test in advanced colorectal cancer
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4879158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26984642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40291-016-0193-4
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmaabha novelapproachforclinicalvalidationofthecobaskrasmutationtestinadvancedcolorectalcancer
AT zhangguili novelapproachforclinicalvalidationofthecobaskrasmutationtestinadvancedcolorectalcancer
AT aslamshagufta novelapproachforclinicalvalidationofthecobaskrasmutationtestinadvancedcolorectalcancer
AT yukaren novelapproachforclinicalvalidationofthecobaskrasmutationtestinadvancedcolorectalcancer
AT cheemelody novelapproachforclinicalvalidationofthecobaskrasmutationtestinadvancedcolorectalcancer
AT palmajohnf novelapproachforclinicalvalidationofthecobaskrasmutationtestinadvancedcolorectalcancer