Cargando…

Addition of Everolimus Post VEGFR Inhibition Treatment Failure in Advanced Sarcoma Patients Who Previously Benefited from VEGFR Inhibition: A Case Series

BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic sarcoma who progress on vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors (VEGFRi) have limited treatment options. Upregulation of the mTOR pathway has been demonstrated to be a means of resistance to targeted VEGFRi in metastatic sarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: ElNaggar, Adam C., Hays, John L., Chen, James L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4905654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27295141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156985
_version_ 1782437289461284864
author ElNaggar, Adam C.
Hays, John L.
Chen, James L.
author_facet ElNaggar, Adam C.
Hays, John L.
Chen, James L.
author_sort ElNaggar, Adam C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic sarcoma who progress on vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors (VEGFRi) have limited treatment options. Upregulation of the mTOR pathway has been demonstrated to be a means of resistance to targeted VEGFRi in metastatic sarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study to evaluate the clinical benefit at four months of combining mTOR inhibition (mTORi) via everolimus with VEGFRi in patients who have derived benefit from single-agent VEGFRi but have progressed. Patients with recurrent, metastatic soft tissue or bone sarcomas who progressed after deriving clinical benefit to VEGFRi beyond 12 weeks were continued on VEGFRi with the addition of everolimus (5 mg daily). Progression free survival was measured from start of VEGFRi to disease progression on single agent VEGFRi as well as from the addition of everolimus therapy to disease progression or drug discontinuation due to toxicity. Clinical benefit was defined as stable disease or partial response at 4 months. RESULTS: Nine patients were evaluated. Two patients did not tolerate therapy due to GI toxicity and one elected to discontinue therapy. Of the remaining six patients, the clinical benefit rate at four months was 50%. Progression free survival (PFS) for these patients was 3.1 months ranging from 0.5 to 7.2 months with one patient remaining on combination therapy. CONCLUSION: In this heavily pre-treated, advanced sarcoma population, the addition of mTOR inhibition to VEGFRi based therapy resulted in a clinical benefit for a subset of patients. Prospective studies will be needed to verify these results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4905654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49056542016-06-28 Addition of Everolimus Post VEGFR Inhibition Treatment Failure in Advanced Sarcoma Patients Who Previously Benefited from VEGFR Inhibition: A Case Series ElNaggar, Adam C. Hays, John L. Chen, James L. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic sarcoma who progress on vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors (VEGFRi) have limited treatment options. Upregulation of the mTOR pathway has been demonstrated to be a means of resistance to targeted VEGFRi in metastatic sarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study to evaluate the clinical benefit at four months of combining mTOR inhibition (mTORi) via everolimus with VEGFRi in patients who have derived benefit from single-agent VEGFRi but have progressed. Patients with recurrent, metastatic soft tissue or bone sarcomas who progressed after deriving clinical benefit to VEGFRi beyond 12 weeks were continued on VEGFRi with the addition of everolimus (5 mg daily). Progression free survival was measured from start of VEGFRi to disease progression on single agent VEGFRi as well as from the addition of everolimus therapy to disease progression or drug discontinuation due to toxicity. Clinical benefit was defined as stable disease or partial response at 4 months. RESULTS: Nine patients were evaluated. Two patients did not tolerate therapy due to GI toxicity and one elected to discontinue therapy. Of the remaining six patients, the clinical benefit rate at four months was 50%. Progression free survival (PFS) for these patients was 3.1 months ranging from 0.5 to 7.2 months with one patient remaining on combination therapy. CONCLUSION: In this heavily pre-treated, advanced sarcoma population, the addition of mTOR inhibition to VEGFRi based therapy resulted in a clinical benefit for a subset of patients. Prospective studies will be needed to verify these results. Public Library of Science 2016-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4905654/ /pubmed/27295141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156985 Text en © 2016 ElNaggar et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
ElNaggar, Adam C.
Hays, John L.
Chen, James L.
Addition of Everolimus Post VEGFR Inhibition Treatment Failure in Advanced Sarcoma Patients Who Previously Benefited from VEGFR Inhibition: A Case Series
title Addition of Everolimus Post VEGFR Inhibition Treatment Failure in Advanced Sarcoma Patients Who Previously Benefited from VEGFR Inhibition: A Case Series
title_full Addition of Everolimus Post VEGFR Inhibition Treatment Failure in Advanced Sarcoma Patients Who Previously Benefited from VEGFR Inhibition: A Case Series
title_fullStr Addition of Everolimus Post VEGFR Inhibition Treatment Failure in Advanced Sarcoma Patients Who Previously Benefited from VEGFR Inhibition: A Case Series
title_full_unstemmed Addition of Everolimus Post VEGFR Inhibition Treatment Failure in Advanced Sarcoma Patients Who Previously Benefited from VEGFR Inhibition: A Case Series
title_short Addition of Everolimus Post VEGFR Inhibition Treatment Failure in Advanced Sarcoma Patients Who Previously Benefited from VEGFR Inhibition: A Case Series
title_sort addition of everolimus post vegfr inhibition treatment failure in advanced sarcoma patients who previously benefited from vegfr inhibition: a case series
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4905654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27295141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156985
work_keys_str_mv AT elnaggaradamc additionofeverolimuspostvegfrinhibitiontreatmentfailureinadvancedsarcomapatientswhopreviouslybenefitedfromvegfrinhibitionacaseseries
AT haysjohnl additionofeverolimuspostvegfrinhibitiontreatmentfailureinadvancedsarcomapatientswhopreviouslybenefitedfromvegfrinhibitionacaseseries
AT chenjamesl additionofeverolimuspostvegfrinhibitiontreatmentfailureinadvancedsarcomapatientswhopreviouslybenefitedfromvegfrinhibitionacaseseries