Cargando…
A liposomal Gd contrast agent does not cross the mouse placental barrier
The trans-placental permeability of liposomal Gadolinium (Gd) nanoparticle contrast agents was evaluated in a pregnant mouse model. Pregnant Balb/c mice at 16.5 (±1) days of gestation were imaged using a 3D Spoiled Gradient Echo method at 9.4 T using two contrast agents: a clinically approved Gd che...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4906290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27298076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep27863 |
_version_ | 1782437398426157056 |
---|---|
author | Shetty, Anil N. Pautler, Robia Ghagahda, Ketan Rendon, David Gao, Haijun Starosolski, Zbigniew Bhavane, Rohan Patel, Chandreshkumar Annapragada, Ananth Yallampalli, Chandrasekhar Lee, Wesley |
author_facet | Shetty, Anil N. Pautler, Robia Ghagahda, Ketan Rendon, David Gao, Haijun Starosolski, Zbigniew Bhavane, Rohan Patel, Chandreshkumar Annapragada, Ananth Yallampalli, Chandrasekhar Lee, Wesley |
author_sort | Shetty, Anil N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The trans-placental permeability of liposomal Gadolinium (Gd) nanoparticle contrast agents was evaluated in a pregnant mouse model. Pregnant Balb/c mice at 16.5 (±1) days of gestation were imaged using a 3D Spoiled Gradient Echo method at 9.4 T using two contrast agents: a clinically approved Gd chelate, Multihance(®) (gadobenate dimeglumine), and a novel experimental liposomal Gd agent. A Dynamic Contrast Enhancement (DCE) protocol was used to capture the dynamics of contrast entry and distribution in the placenta, and clearance from circulation. A blinded clinical radiologist evaluated both sets of images. A reference region model was used to measure the placental flow and physiological parameters; volume transfer constant (K(trans)), efflux rate constant (K(ep)). The Gd content of excised placentae and fetuses was measured, using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). MRI images of pregnant mice and ICP-MS analyses of placental and fetal tissue demonstrated undetectably low transplacental permeation of the liposomal Gd agent, while the clinical agent (Multihance) avidly permeated the placental barrier. Image interpretation and diagnostic quality was equivalent between the two contrast agents. Additional testing to determine both maternal and fetal safety of liposomal Gd is suggested. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4906290 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49062902016-06-14 A liposomal Gd contrast agent does not cross the mouse placental barrier Shetty, Anil N. Pautler, Robia Ghagahda, Ketan Rendon, David Gao, Haijun Starosolski, Zbigniew Bhavane, Rohan Patel, Chandreshkumar Annapragada, Ananth Yallampalli, Chandrasekhar Lee, Wesley Sci Rep Article The trans-placental permeability of liposomal Gadolinium (Gd) nanoparticle contrast agents was evaluated in a pregnant mouse model. Pregnant Balb/c mice at 16.5 (±1) days of gestation were imaged using a 3D Spoiled Gradient Echo method at 9.4 T using two contrast agents: a clinically approved Gd chelate, Multihance(®) (gadobenate dimeglumine), and a novel experimental liposomal Gd agent. A Dynamic Contrast Enhancement (DCE) protocol was used to capture the dynamics of contrast entry and distribution in the placenta, and clearance from circulation. A blinded clinical radiologist evaluated both sets of images. A reference region model was used to measure the placental flow and physiological parameters; volume transfer constant (K(trans)), efflux rate constant (K(ep)). The Gd content of excised placentae and fetuses was measured, using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). MRI images of pregnant mice and ICP-MS analyses of placental and fetal tissue demonstrated undetectably low transplacental permeation of the liposomal Gd agent, while the clinical agent (Multihance) avidly permeated the placental barrier. Image interpretation and diagnostic quality was equivalent between the two contrast agents. Additional testing to determine both maternal and fetal safety of liposomal Gd is suggested. Nature Publishing Group 2016-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4906290/ /pubmed/27298076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep27863 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Shetty, Anil N. Pautler, Robia Ghagahda, Ketan Rendon, David Gao, Haijun Starosolski, Zbigniew Bhavane, Rohan Patel, Chandreshkumar Annapragada, Ananth Yallampalli, Chandrasekhar Lee, Wesley A liposomal Gd contrast agent does not cross the mouse placental barrier |
title | A liposomal Gd contrast agent does not cross the mouse placental barrier |
title_full | A liposomal Gd contrast agent does not cross the mouse placental barrier |
title_fullStr | A liposomal Gd contrast agent does not cross the mouse placental barrier |
title_full_unstemmed | A liposomal Gd contrast agent does not cross the mouse placental barrier |
title_short | A liposomal Gd contrast agent does not cross the mouse placental barrier |
title_sort | liposomal gd contrast agent does not cross the mouse placental barrier |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4906290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27298076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep27863 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shettyaniln aliposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier AT pautlerrobia aliposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier AT ghagahdaketan aliposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier AT rendondavid aliposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier AT gaohaijun aliposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier AT starosolskizbigniew aliposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier AT bhavanerohan aliposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier AT patelchandreshkumar aliposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier AT annapragadaananth aliposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier AT yallampallichandrasekhar aliposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier AT leewesley aliposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier AT shettyaniln liposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier AT pautlerrobia liposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier AT ghagahdaketan liposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier AT rendondavid liposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier AT gaohaijun liposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier AT starosolskizbigniew liposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier AT bhavanerohan liposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier AT patelchandreshkumar liposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier AT annapragadaananth liposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier AT yallampallichandrasekhar liposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier AT leewesley liposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier |