Cargando…

A liposomal Gd contrast agent does not cross the mouse placental barrier

The trans-placental permeability of liposomal Gadolinium (Gd) nanoparticle contrast agents was evaluated in a pregnant mouse model. Pregnant Balb/c mice at 16.5 (±1) days of gestation were imaged using a 3D Spoiled Gradient Echo method at 9.4 T using two contrast agents: a clinically approved Gd che...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shetty, Anil N., Pautler, Robia, Ghagahda, Ketan, Rendon, David, Gao, Haijun, Starosolski, Zbigniew, Bhavane, Rohan, Patel, Chandreshkumar, Annapragada, Ananth, Yallampalli, Chandrasekhar, Lee, Wesley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4906290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27298076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep27863
_version_ 1782437398426157056
author Shetty, Anil N.
Pautler, Robia
Ghagahda, Ketan
Rendon, David
Gao, Haijun
Starosolski, Zbigniew
Bhavane, Rohan
Patel, Chandreshkumar
Annapragada, Ananth
Yallampalli, Chandrasekhar
Lee, Wesley
author_facet Shetty, Anil N.
Pautler, Robia
Ghagahda, Ketan
Rendon, David
Gao, Haijun
Starosolski, Zbigniew
Bhavane, Rohan
Patel, Chandreshkumar
Annapragada, Ananth
Yallampalli, Chandrasekhar
Lee, Wesley
author_sort Shetty, Anil N.
collection PubMed
description The trans-placental permeability of liposomal Gadolinium (Gd) nanoparticle contrast agents was evaluated in a pregnant mouse model. Pregnant Balb/c mice at 16.5 (±1) days of gestation were imaged using a 3D Spoiled Gradient Echo method at 9.4 T using two contrast agents: a clinically approved Gd chelate, Multihance(®) (gadobenate dimeglumine), and a novel experimental liposomal Gd agent. A Dynamic Contrast Enhancement (DCE) protocol was used to capture the dynamics of contrast entry and distribution in the placenta, and clearance from circulation. A blinded clinical radiologist evaluated both sets of images. A reference region model was used to measure the placental flow and physiological parameters; volume transfer constant (K(trans)), efflux rate constant (K(ep)). The Gd content of excised placentae and fetuses was measured, using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). MRI images of pregnant mice and ICP-MS analyses of placental and fetal tissue demonstrated undetectably low transplacental permeation of the liposomal Gd agent, while the clinical agent (Multihance) avidly permeated the placental barrier. Image interpretation and diagnostic quality was equivalent between the two contrast agents. Additional testing to determine both maternal and fetal safety of liposomal Gd is suggested.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4906290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49062902016-06-14 A liposomal Gd contrast agent does not cross the mouse placental barrier Shetty, Anil N. Pautler, Robia Ghagahda, Ketan Rendon, David Gao, Haijun Starosolski, Zbigniew Bhavane, Rohan Patel, Chandreshkumar Annapragada, Ananth Yallampalli, Chandrasekhar Lee, Wesley Sci Rep Article The trans-placental permeability of liposomal Gadolinium (Gd) nanoparticle contrast agents was evaluated in a pregnant mouse model. Pregnant Balb/c mice at 16.5 (±1) days of gestation were imaged using a 3D Spoiled Gradient Echo method at 9.4 T using two contrast agents: a clinically approved Gd chelate, Multihance(®) (gadobenate dimeglumine), and a novel experimental liposomal Gd agent. A Dynamic Contrast Enhancement (DCE) protocol was used to capture the dynamics of contrast entry and distribution in the placenta, and clearance from circulation. A blinded clinical radiologist evaluated both sets of images. A reference region model was used to measure the placental flow and physiological parameters; volume transfer constant (K(trans)), efflux rate constant (K(ep)). The Gd content of excised placentae and fetuses was measured, using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). MRI images of pregnant mice and ICP-MS analyses of placental and fetal tissue demonstrated undetectably low transplacental permeation of the liposomal Gd agent, while the clinical agent (Multihance) avidly permeated the placental barrier. Image interpretation and diagnostic quality was equivalent between the two contrast agents. Additional testing to determine both maternal and fetal safety of liposomal Gd is suggested. Nature Publishing Group 2016-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4906290/ /pubmed/27298076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep27863 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Shetty, Anil N.
Pautler, Robia
Ghagahda, Ketan
Rendon, David
Gao, Haijun
Starosolski, Zbigniew
Bhavane, Rohan
Patel, Chandreshkumar
Annapragada, Ananth
Yallampalli, Chandrasekhar
Lee, Wesley
A liposomal Gd contrast agent does not cross the mouse placental barrier
title A liposomal Gd contrast agent does not cross the mouse placental barrier
title_full A liposomal Gd contrast agent does not cross the mouse placental barrier
title_fullStr A liposomal Gd contrast agent does not cross the mouse placental barrier
title_full_unstemmed A liposomal Gd contrast agent does not cross the mouse placental barrier
title_short A liposomal Gd contrast agent does not cross the mouse placental barrier
title_sort liposomal gd contrast agent does not cross the mouse placental barrier
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4906290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27298076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep27863
work_keys_str_mv AT shettyaniln aliposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier
AT pautlerrobia aliposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier
AT ghagahdaketan aliposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier
AT rendondavid aliposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier
AT gaohaijun aliposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier
AT starosolskizbigniew aliposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier
AT bhavanerohan aliposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier
AT patelchandreshkumar aliposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier
AT annapragadaananth aliposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier
AT yallampallichandrasekhar aliposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier
AT leewesley aliposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier
AT shettyaniln liposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier
AT pautlerrobia liposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier
AT ghagahdaketan liposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier
AT rendondavid liposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier
AT gaohaijun liposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier
AT starosolskizbigniew liposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier
AT bhavanerohan liposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier
AT patelchandreshkumar liposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier
AT annapragadaananth liposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier
AT yallampallichandrasekhar liposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier
AT leewesley liposomalgdcontrastagentdoesnotcrossthemouseplacentalbarrier