Cargando…

A Conceptual Framework for Graduate Teaching Assistant Professional Development Evaluation and Research

Biology graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) are significant contributors to the educational mission of universities, particularly in introductory courses, yet there is a lack of empirical data on how to best prepare them for their teaching roles. This essay proposes a conceptual framework for biolog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reeves, Todd D., Marbach-Ad, Gili, Miller, Kristen R., Ridgway, Judith, Gardner, Grant E., Schussler, Elisabeth E., Wischusen, E. William
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Cell Biology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4909349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27193291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-10-0225
_version_ 1782437826758967296
author Reeves, Todd D.
Marbach-Ad, Gili
Miller, Kristen R.
Ridgway, Judith
Gardner, Grant E.
Schussler, Elisabeth E.
Wischusen, E. William
author_facet Reeves, Todd D.
Marbach-Ad, Gili
Miller, Kristen R.
Ridgway, Judith
Gardner, Grant E.
Schussler, Elisabeth E.
Wischusen, E. William
author_sort Reeves, Todd D.
collection PubMed
description Biology graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) are significant contributors to the educational mission of universities, particularly in introductory courses, yet there is a lack of empirical data on how to best prepare them for their teaching roles. This essay proposes a conceptual framework for biology GTA teaching professional development (TPD) program evaluation and research with three overarching variable categories for consideration: outcome variables, contextual variables, and moderating variables. The framework’s outcome variables go beyond GTA satisfaction and instead position GTA cognition, GTA teaching practice, and undergraduate learning outcomes as the foci of GTA TPD evaluation and research. For each GTA TPD outcome variable, key evaluation questions and example assessment instruments are introduced to demonstrate how the framework can be used to guide GTA TPD evaluation and research plans. A common conceptual framework is also essential to coordinating the collection and synthesis of empirical data on GTA TPD nationally. Thus, the proposed conceptual framework serves as both a guide for conducting GTA TPD evaluation at single institutions and as a means to coordinate research across institutions at a national level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4909349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher American Society for Cell Biology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49093492016-06-24 A Conceptual Framework for Graduate Teaching Assistant Professional Development Evaluation and Research Reeves, Todd D. Marbach-Ad, Gili Miller, Kristen R. Ridgway, Judith Gardner, Grant E. Schussler, Elisabeth E. Wischusen, E. William CBE Life Sci Educ Essay Biology graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) are significant contributors to the educational mission of universities, particularly in introductory courses, yet there is a lack of empirical data on how to best prepare them for their teaching roles. This essay proposes a conceptual framework for biology GTA teaching professional development (TPD) program evaluation and research with three overarching variable categories for consideration: outcome variables, contextual variables, and moderating variables. The framework’s outcome variables go beyond GTA satisfaction and instead position GTA cognition, GTA teaching practice, and undergraduate learning outcomes as the foci of GTA TPD evaluation and research. For each GTA TPD outcome variable, key evaluation questions and example assessment instruments are introduced to demonstrate how the framework can be used to guide GTA TPD evaluation and research plans. A common conceptual framework is also essential to coordinating the collection and synthesis of empirical data on GTA TPD nationally. Thus, the proposed conceptual framework serves as both a guide for conducting GTA TPD evaluation at single institutions and as a means to coordinate research across institutions at a national level. American Society for Cell Biology 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4909349/ /pubmed/27193291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-10-0225 Text en © 2016 T. D. Reeves et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2016 The American Society for Cell Biology. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0). “ASCB®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology.
spellingShingle Essay
Reeves, Todd D.
Marbach-Ad, Gili
Miller, Kristen R.
Ridgway, Judith
Gardner, Grant E.
Schussler, Elisabeth E.
Wischusen, E. William
A Conceptual Framework for Graduate Teaching Assistant Professional Development Evaluation and Research
title A Conceptual Framework for Graduate Teaching Assistant Professional Development Evaluation and Research
title_full A Conceptual Framework for Graduate Teaching Assistant Professional Development Evaluation and Research
title_fullStr A Conceptual Framework for Graduate Teaching Assistant Professional Development Evaluation and Research
title_full_unstemmed A Conceptual Framework for Graduate Teaching Assistant Professional Development Evaluation and Research
title_short A Conceptual Framework for Graduate Teaching Assistant Professional Development Evaluation and Research
title_sort conceptual framework for graduate teaching assistant professional development evaluation and research
topic Essay
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4909349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27193291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-10-0225
work_keys_str_mv AT reevestoddd aconceptualframeworkforgraduateteachingassistantprofessionaldevelopmentevaluationandresearch
AT marbachadgili aconceptualframeworkforgraduateteachingassistantprofessionaldevelopmentevaluationandresearch
AT millerkristenr aconceptualframeworkforgraduateteachingassistantprofessionaldevelopmentevaluationandresearch
AT ridgwayjudith aconceptualframeworkforgraduateteachingassistantprofessionaldevelopmentevaluationandresearch
AT gardnergrante aconceptualframeworkforgraduateteachingassistantprofessionaldevelopmentevaluationandresearch
AT schusslerelisabethe aconceptualframeworkforgraduateteachingassistantprofessionaldevelopmentevaluationandresearch
AT wischusenewilliam aconceptualframeworkforgraduateteachingassistantprofessionaldevelopmentevaluationandresearch
AT reevestoddd conceptualframeworkforgraduateteachingassistantprofessionaldevelopmentevaluationandresearch
AT marbachadgili conceptualframeworkforgraduateteachingassistantprofessionaldevelopmentevaluationandresearch
AT millerkristenr conceptualframeworkforgraduateteachingassistantprofessionaldevelopmentevaluationandresearch
AT ridgwayjudith conceptualframeworkforgraduateteachingassistantprofessionaldevelopmentevaluationandresearch
AT gardnergrante conceptualframeworkforgraduateteachingassistantprofessionaldevelopmentevaluationandresearch
AT schusslerelisabethe conceptualframeworkforgraduateteachingassistantprofessionaldevelopmentevaluationandresearch
AT wischusenewilliam conceptualframeworkforgraduateteachingassistantprofessionaldevelopmentevaluationandresearch