Cargando…
16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform
BACKGROUND: Next-generation sequencing platforms have revolutionised our ability to investigate the microbiota composition of complex environments, frequently through 16S rRNA gene sequencing of the bacterial component of the community. Numerous factors, including DNA extraction method, primer seque...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4921037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27342980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-016-0738-z |
_version_ | 1782439469525237760 |
---|---|
author | Fouhy, Fiona Clooney, Adam G. Stanton, Catherine Claesson, Marcus J. Cotter, Paul D. |
author_facet | Fouhy, Fiona Clooney, Adam G. Stanton, Catherine Claesson, Marcus J. Cotter, Paul D. |
author_sort | Fouhy, Fiona |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Next-generation sequencing platforms have revolutionised our ability to investigate the microbiota composition of complex environments, frequently through 16S rRNA gene sequencing of the bacterial component of the community. Numerous factors, including DNA extraction method, primer sequences and sequencing platform employed, can affect the accuracy of the results achieved. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of these three factors on 16S rRNA gene sequencing results, using mock communities and mock community DNA. RESULTS: The use of different primer sequences (V4-V5, V1-V2 and V1-V2 degenerate primers) resulted in differences in the genera and species detected. The V4-V5 primers gave the most comparable results across platforms. The three Ion PGM primer sets detected more of the 20 mock community species than the equivalent MiSeq primer sets. Data generated from DNA extracted using the 2 extraction methods were very similar. CONCLUSIONS: Microbiota compositional data differed depending on the primers and sequencing platform that were used. The results demonstrate the risks in comparing data generated using different sequencing approaches and highlight the merits of choosing a standardised approach for sequencing in situations where a comparison across multiple sequencing runs is required. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12866-016-0738-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4921037 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49210372016-06-26 16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform Fouhy, Fiona Clooney, Adam G. Stanton, Catherine Claesson, Marcus J. Cotter, Paul D. BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Next-generation sequencing platforms have revolutionised our ability to investigate the microbiota composition of complex environments, frequently through 16S rRNA gene sequencing of the bacterial component of the community. Numerous factors, including DNA extraction method, primer sequences and sequencing platform employed, can affect the accuracy of the results achieved. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of these three factors on 16S rRNA gene sequencing results, using mock communities and mock community DNA. RESULTS: The use of different primer sequences (V4-V5, V1-V2 and V1-V2 degenerate primers) resulted in differences in the genera and species detected. The V4-V5 primers gave the most comparable results across platforms. The three Ion PGM primer sets detected more of the 20 mock community species than the equivalent MiSeq primer sets. Data generated from DNA extracted using the 2 extraction methods were very similar. CONCLUSIONS: Microbiota compositional data differed depending on the primers and sequencing platform that were used. The results demonstrate the risks in comparing data generated using different sequencing approaches and highlight the merits of choosing a standardised approach for sequencing in situations where a comparison across multiple sequencing runs is required. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12866-016-0738-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4921037/ /pubmed/27342980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-016-0738-z Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fouhy, Fiona Clooney, Adam G. Stanton, Catherine Claesson, Marcus J. Cotter, Paul D. 16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform |
title | 16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform |
title_full | 16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform |
title_fullStr | 16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform |
title_full_unstemmed | 16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform |
title_short | 16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform |
title_sort | 16s rrna gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of dna extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4921037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27342980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-016-0738-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fouhyfiona 16srrnagenesequencingofmockmicrobialpopulationsimpactofdnaextractionmethodprimerchoiceandsequencingplatform AT clooneyadamg 16srrnagenesequencingofmockmicrobialpopulationsimpactofdnaextractionmethodprimerchoiceandsequencingplatform AT stantoncatherine 16srrnagenesequencingofmockmicrobialpopulationsimpactofdnaextractionmethodprimerchoiceandsequencingplatform AT claessonmarcusj 16srrnagenesequencingofmockmicrobialpopulationsimpactofdnaextractionmethodprimerchoiceandsequencingplatform AT cotterpauld 16srrnagenesequencingofmockmicrobialpopulationsimpactofdnaextractionmethodprimerchoiceandsequencingplatform |