Cargando…

16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform

BACKGROUND: Next-generation sequencing platforms have revolutionised our ability to investigate the microbiota composition of complex environments, frequently through 16S rRNA gene sequencing of the bacterial component of the community. Numerous factors, including DNA extraction method, primer seque...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fouhy, Fiona, Clooney, Adam G., Stanton, Catherine, Claesson, Marcus J., Cotter, Paul D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4921037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27342980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-016-0738-z
_version_ 1782439469525237760
author Fouhy, Fiona
Clooney, Adam G.
Stanton, Catherine
Claesson, Marcus J.
Cotter, Paul D.
author_facet Fouhy, Fiona
Clooney, Adam G.
Stanton, Catherine
Claesson, Marcus J.
Cotter, Paul D.
author_sort Fouhy, Fiona
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Next-generation sequencing platforms have revolutionised our ability to investigate the microbiota composition of complex environments, frequently through 16S rRNA gene sequencing of the bacterial component of the community. Numerous factors, including DNA extraction method, primer sequences and sequencing platform employed, can affect the accuracy of the results achieved. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of these three factors on 16S rRNA gene sequencing results, using mock communities and mock community DNA. RESULTS: The use of different primer sequences (V4-V5, V1-V2 and V1-V2 degenerate primers) resulted in differences in the genera and species detected. The V4-V5 primers gave the most comparable results across platforms. The three Ion PGM primer sets detected more of the 20 mock community species than the equivalent MiSeq primer sets. Data generated from DNA extracted using the 2 extraction methods were very similar. CONCLUSIONS: Microbiota compositional data differed depending on the primers and sequencing platform that were used. The results demonstrate the risks in comparing data generated using different sequencing approaches and highlight the merits of choosing a standardised approach for sequencing in situations where a comparison across multiple sequencing runs is required. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12866-016-0738-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4921037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49210372016-06-26 16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform Fouhy, Fiona Clooney, Adam G. Stanton, Catherine Claesson, Marcus J. Cotter, Paul D. BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Next-generation sequencing platforms have revolutionised our ability to investigate the microbiota composition of complex environments, frequently through 16S rRNA gene sequencing of the bacterial component of the community. Numerous factors, including DNA extraction method, primer sequences and sequencing platform employed, can affect the accuracy of the results achieved. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of these three factors on 16S rRNA gene sequencing results, using mock communities and mock community DNA. RESULTS: The use of different primer sequences (V4-V5, V1-V2 and V1-V2 degenerate primers) resulted in differences in the genera and species detected. The V4-V5 primers gave the most comparable results across platforms. The three Ion PGM primer sets detected more of the 20 mock community species than the equivalent MiSeq primer sets. Data generated from DNA extracted using the 2 extraction methods were very similar. CONCLUSIONS: Microbiota compositional data differed depending on the primers and sequencing platform that were used. The results demonstrate the risks in comparing data generated using different sequencing approaches and highlight the merits of choosing a standardised approach for sequencing in situations where a comparison across multiple sequencing runs is required. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12866-016-0738-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4921037/ /pubmed/27342980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-016-0738-z Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fouhy, Fiona
Clooney, Adam G.
Stanton, Catherine
Claesson, Marcus J.
Cotter, Paul D.
16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform
title 16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform
title_full 16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform
title_fullStr 16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform
title_full_unstemmed 16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform
title_short 16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform
title_sort 16s rrna gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of dna extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4921037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27342980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-016-0738-z
work_keys_str_mv AT fouhyfiona 16srrnagenesequencingofmockmicrobialpopulationsimpactofdnaextractionmethodprimerchoiceandsequencingplatform
AT clooneyadamg 16srrnagenesequencingofmockmicrobialpopulationsimpactofdnaextractionmethodprimerchoiceandsequencingplatform
AT stantoncatherine 16srrnagenesequencingofmockmicrobialpopulationsimpactofdnaextractionmethodprimerchoiceandsequencingplatform
AT claessonmarcusj 16srrnagenesequencingofmockmicrobialpopulationsimpactofdnaextractionmethodprimerchoiceandsequencingplatform
AT cotterpauld 16srrnagenesequencingofmockmicrobialpopulationsimpactofdnaextractionmethodprimerchoiceandsequencingplatform