Cargando…

Variable responses of human microbiomes to dietary supplementation with resistant starch

BACKGROUND: The fermentation of dietary fiber to various organic acids is a beneficial function provided by the microbiota in the human large intestine. In particular, butyric acid contributes to host health by facilitating maintenance of epithelial integrity, regulating inflammation, and influencin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Venkataraman, A., Sieber, J. R., Schmidt, A. W., Waldron, C., Theis, K. R., Schmidt, T. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4928258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27357127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-016-0178-x
_version_ 1782440403171016704
author Venkataraman, A.
Sieber, J. R.
Schmidt, A. W.
Waldron, C.
Theis, K. R.
Schmidt, T. M.
author_facet Venkataraman, A.
Sieber, J. R.
Schmidt, A. W.
Waldron, C.
Theis, K. R.
Schmidt, T. M.
author_sort Venkataraman, A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The fermentation of dietary fiber to various organic acids is a beneficial function provided by the microbiota in the human large intestine. In particular, butyric acid contributes to host health by facilitating maintenance of epithelial integrity, regulating inflammation, and influencing gene expression in colonocytes. We sought to increase the concentration of butyrate in 20 healthy young adults through dietary supplementation with resistant starch (unmodified potato starch—resistant starch (RS) type 2). METHODS: Fecal samples were collected from individuals to characterize butyrate concentration via liquid chromatography and composition of the microbiota via surveys of 16S rRNA-encoding gene sequences from the Illumina MiSeq platform. Random Forest and LEfSe analyses were used to associate responses in butyrate production to features of the microbiota. RESULTS: RS supplementation increased fecal butyrate concentrations in this cohort from 8 to 12 mmol/kg wet feces, but responses varied widely between individuals. Individuals could be categorized into three groups based upon butyrate concentrations before and during RS: enhanced, high, and low (n = 11, 3, and 6, respectively). Fecal butyrate increased by 67 % in the enhanced group (from 9 to 15 mmol/kg), while it remained ≥11 mmol/kg in the high group and ≤8 mmol/kg in the low group. Microbiota analyses revealed that the relative abundance of RS-degrading organisms—Bifidobacterium adolescentis or Ruminococcus bromii—increased from ~2 to 9 % in the enhanced and high groups, but remained at ~1.5 % in the low group. The lack of increase in RS-degrading bacteria in the low group may explain why there was no increase in fecal butyrate in response to RS. The microbiota of individuals in the high group were characterized by an elevated abundance of the butyrogenic microbe Eubacterium rectale (~6 % in high vs. 3 % in enhanced and low groups) throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: We document the heterogeneous responses in butyrate concentrations upon RS supplementation and identify characteristic of the microbiota that appear to underlie this variation. This study complements and extends other studies that call for personalized approaches to manage beneficial functions provided by gut microbiomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4928258
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49282582016-06-30 Variable responses of human microbiomes to dietary supplementation with resistant starch Venkataraman, A. Sieber, J. R. Schmidt, A. W. Waldron, C. Theis, K. R. Schmidt, T. M. Microbiome Research BACKGROUND: The fermentation of dietary fiber to various organic acids is a beneficial function provided by the microbiota in the human large intestine. In particular, butyric acid contributes to host health by facilitating maintenance of epithelial integrity, regulating inflammation, and influencing gene expression in colonocytes. We sought to increase the concentration of butyrate in 20 healthy young adults through dietary supplementation with resistant starch (unmodified potato starch—resistant starch (RS) type 2). METHODS: Fecal samples were collected from individuals to characterize butyrate concentration via liquid chromatography and composition of the microbiota via surveys of 16S rRNA-encoding gene sequences from the Illumina MiSeq platform. Random Forest and LEfSe analyses were used to associate responses in butyrate production to features of the microbiota. RESULTS: RS supplementation increased fecal butyrate concentrations in this cohort from 8 to 12 mmol/kg wet feces, but responses varied widely between individuals. Individuals could be categorized into three groups based upon butyrate concentrations before and during RS: enhanced, high, and low (n = 11, 3, and 6, respectively). Fecal butyrate increased by 67 % in the enhanced group (from 9 to 15 mmol/kg), while it remained ≥11 mmol/kg in the high group and ≤8 mmol/kg in the low group. Microbiota analyses revealed that the relative abundance of RS-degrading organisms—Bifidobacterium adolescentis or Ruminococcus bromii—increased from ~2 to 9 % in the enhanced and high groups, but remained at ~1.5 % in the low group. The lack of increase in RS-degrading bacteria in the low group may explain why there was no increase in fecal butyrate in response to RS. The microbiota of individuals in the high group were characterized by an elevated abundance of the butyrogenic microbe Eubacterium rectale (~6 % in high vs. 3 % in enhanced and low groups) throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: We document the heterogeneous responses in butyrate concentrations upon RS supplementation and identify characteristic of the microbiota that appear to underlie this variation. This study complements and extends other studies that call for personalized approaches to manage beneficial functions provided by gut microbiomes. BioMed Central 2016-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4928258/ /pubmed/27357127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-016-0178-x Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Venkataraman, A.
Sieber, J. R.
Schmidt, A. W.
Waldron, C.
Theis, K. R.
Schmidt, T. M.
Variable responses of human microbiomes to dietary supplementation with resistant starch
title Variable responses of human microbiomes to dietary supplementation with resistant starch
title_full Variable responses of human microbiomes to dietary supplementation with resistant starch
title_fullStr Variable responses of human microbiomes to dietary supplementation with resistant starch
title_full_unstemmed Variable responses of human microbiomes to dietary supplementation with resistant starch
title_short Variable responses of human microbiomes to dietary supplementation with resistant starch
title_sort variable responses of human microbiomes to dietary supplementation with resistant starch
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4928258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27357127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-016-0178-x
work_keys_str_mv AT venkataramana variableresponsesofhumanmicrobiomestodietarysupplementationwithresistantstarch
AT sieberjr variableresponsesofhumanmicrobiomestodietarysupplementationwithresistantstarch
AT schmidtaw variableresponsesofhumanmicrobiomestodietarysupplementationwithresistantstarch
AT waldronc variableresponsesofhumanmicrobiomestodietarysupplementationwithresistantstarch
AT theiskr variableresponsesofhumanmicrobiomestodietarysupplementationwithresistantstarch
AT schmidttm variableresponsesofhumanmicrobiomestodietarysupplementationwithresistantstarch