Cargando…

Beyond Wishful Thinking: Integrating Consumer Preferences in the Assessment of Dietary Recommendations

Convenience, taste, and prices are the main determinants of food choices. Complying with dietary recommendations therefore imposes a “taste cost” on consumers, potentially hindering adoption of those recommendations. The study presents and applies a new methodology, based on economic theory, to quan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Irz, Xavier, Leroy, Pascal, Réquillart, Vincent, Soler, Louis-Georges
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4928961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27362764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158453
_version_ 1782440531079462912
author Irz, Xavier
Leroy, Pascal
Réquillart, Vincent
Soler, Louis-Georges
author_facet Irz, Xavier
Leroy, Pascal
Réquillart, Vincent
Soler, Louis-Georges
author_sort Irz, Xavier
collection PubMed
description Convenience, taste, and prices are the main determinants of food choices. Complying with dietary recommendations therefore imposes a “taste cost” on consumers, potentially hindering adoption of those recommendations. The study presents and applies a new methodology, based on economic theory, to quantify this taste cost and assess the health and welfare effects of different dietary recommendations. Then, by comparison of those effects, we identify socially desirable recommendations that are most compatible with consumer preferences (i.e., that best balance health benefits against”taste cost”) and should be prioritized for promotion. The methodology proceeds in three-steps: first, an economic-behavioral model simulates how whole diets would change if consumers complied with dietary recommendations; second, an epidemiological model estimates the number of deaths avoided (DA) due to the dietary change; third, an efficiency analysis weighs the health benefits against the taste and policy costs of each recommendation. The empirical model is calibrated using French data. We find that recommendations to reduce consumption of red meat and soft-drinks, or raise consumption of milk products and fish/seafood impose relatively moderate taste costs. By comparison, recommendations related to F&V consumption and, to a lesser extent, butter/cream/cheese, snacks, and all meats impose larger taste costs on consumers. The F&V recommendation is the costliest for consumers to comply with, but it also reduces diet-related mortality the most, so that a large budget could be allocated to promoting F&V consumption while keeping this policy cost-beneficial. We conclude that promotion of most dietary recommendations improves social welfare. Our framework complements the programming models available in nutrition and public health: those models are best used to identify dietary targets, following which our framework identifies cost-beneficial ways of moving towards those targets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4928961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49289612016-07-18 Beyond Wishful Thinking: Integrating Consumer Preferences in the Assessment of Dietary Recommendations Irz, Xavier Leroy, Pascal Réquillart, Vincent Soler, Louis-Georges PLoS One Research Article Convenience, taste, and prices are the main determinants of food choices. Complying with dietary recommendations therefore imposes a “taste cost” on consumers, potentially hindering adoption of those recommendations. The study presents and applies a new methodology, based on economic theory, to quantify this taste cost and assess the health and welfare effects of different dietary recommendations. Then, by comparison of those effects, we identify socially desirable recommendations that are most compatible with consumer preferences (i.e., that best balance health benefits against”taste cost”) and should be prioritized for promotion. The methodology proceeds in three-steps: first, an economic-behavioral model simulates how whole diets would change if consumers complied with dietary recommendations; second, an epidemiological model estimates the number of deaths avoided (DA) due to the dietary change; third, an efficiency analysis weighs the health benefits against the taste and policy costs of each recommendation. The empirical model is calibrated using French data. We find that recommendations to reduce consumption of red meat and soft-drinks, or raise consumption of milk products and fish/seafood impose relatively moderate taste costs. By comparison, recommendations related to F&V consumption and, to a lesser extent, butter/cream/cheese, snacks, and all meats impose larger taste costs on consumers. The F&V recommendation is the costliest for consumers to comply with, but it also reduces diet-related mortality the most, so that a large budget could be allocated to promoting F&V consumption while keeping this policy cost-beneficial. We conclude that promotion of most dietary recommendations improves social welfare. Our framework complements the programming models available in nutrition and public health: those models are best used to identify dietary targets, following which our framework identifies cost-beneficial ways of moving towards those targets. Public Library of Science 2016-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4928961/ /pubmed/27362764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158453 Text en © 2016 Irz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Irz, Xavier
Leroy, Pascal
Réquillart, Vincent
Soler, Louis-Georges
Beyond Wishful Thinking: Integrating Consumer Preferences in the Assessment of Dietary Recommendations
title Beyond Wishful Thinking: Integrating Consumer Preferences in the Assessment of Dietary Recommendations
title_full Beyond Wishful Thinking: Integrating Consumer Preferences in the Assessment of Dietary Recommendations
title_fullStr Beyond Wishful Thinking: Integrating Consumer Preferences in the Assessment of Dietary Recommendations
title_full_unstemmed Beyond Wishful Thinking: Integrating Consumer Preferences in the Assessment of Dietary Recommendations
title_short Beyond Wishful Thinking: Integrating Consumer Preferences in the Assessment of Dietary Recommendations
title_sort beyond wishful thinking: integrating consumer preferences in the assessment of dietary recommendations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4928961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27362764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158453
work_keys_str_mv AT irzxavier beyondwishfulthinkingintegratingconsumerpreferencesintheassessmentofdietaryrecommendations
AT leroypascal beyondwishfulthinkingintegratingconsumerpreferencesintheassessmentofdietaryrecommendations
AT requillartvincent beyondwishfulthinkingintegratingconsumerpreferencesintheassessmentofdietaryrecommendations
AT solerlouisgeorges beyondwishfulthinkingintegratingconsumerpreferencesintheassessmentofdietaryrecommendations