Cargando…
Two-fold differences are the detection limit for determining transgene copy numbers in plants by real-time PCR
BACKGROUND: After transformation, plants that are homozygous and contain one copy of the transgene are typically selected for further study. If real-time PCR is to be used to determine copy number and zygosity, it must be able to distinguish hemizygous from homozygous and one-copy from two-copy plan...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC493272/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15251044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-4-14 |
_version_ | 1782121667921707008 |
---|---|
author | Bubner, Ben Gase, Klaus Baldwin, Ian T |
author_facet | Bubner, Ben Gase, Klaus Baldwin, Ian T |
author_sort | Bubner, Ben |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: After transformation, plants that are homozygous and contain one copy of the transgene are typically selected for further study. If real-time PCR is to be used to determine copy number and zygosity, it must be able to distinguish hemizygous from homozygous and one-copy from two-copy plants. That is, it must be able to detect two-fold differences. RESULTS: When transgenic Nicotiana attenuata plants which had been previously determined by Southern analysis to contain one or two copies of the transgene, were analyzed by real-time PCR (2(-ΔΔCt )method), the method failed to confirm the results from the Southern analysis. In a second data set we analyzed offspring of a hemizygous one-copy plant, which were expected to segregate into three groups of offspring in a 1:2:1 ratio: no transgene, hemizygous, homozygous. Because it was not possible to distinguish homozygous from hemizygous plants with real-time PCR, we could not verify this segregation ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Detection of two-fold differences by real-time PCR is essential if this procedure is to be used for the characterization of transgenic plants. However, given the high variability between replicates, a detection of two-fold differences is in many cases not possible; in such cases Southern analysis is the more reliable procedure. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-493272 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-4932722004-07-30 Two-fold differences are the detection limit for determining transgene copy numbers in plants by real-time PCR Bubner, Ben Gase, Klaus Baldwin, Ian T BMC Biotechnol Methodology Article BACKGROUND: After transformation, plants that are homozygous and contain one copy of the transgene are typically selected for further study. If real-time PCR is to be used to determine copy number and zygosity, it must be able to distinguish hemizygous from homozygous and one-copy from two-copy plants. That is, it must be able to detect two-fold differences. RESULTS: When transgenic Nicotiana attenuata plants which had been previously determined by Southern analysis to contain one or two copies of the transgene, were analyzed by real-time PCR (2(-ΔΔCt )method), the method failed to confirm the results from the Southern analysis. In a second data set we analyzed offspring of a hemizygous one-copy plant, which were expected to segregate into three groups of offspring in a 1:2:1 ratio: no transgene, hemizygous, homozygous. Because it was not possible to distinguish homozygous from hemizygous plants with real-time PCR, we could not verify this segregation ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Detection of two-fold differences by real-time PCR is essential if this procedure is to be used for the characterization of transgenic plants. However, given the high variability between replicates, a detection of two-fold differences is in many cases not possible; in such cases Southern analysis is the more reliable procedure. BioMed Central 2004-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC493272/ /pubmed/15251044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-4-14 Text en Copyright © 2004 Bubner et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Bubner, Ben Gase, Klaus Baldwin, Ian T Two-fold differences are the detection limit for determining transgene copy numbers in plants by real-time PCR |
title | Two-fold differences are the detection limit for determining transgene copy numbers in plants by real-time PCR |
title_full | Two-fold differences are the detection limit for determining transgene copy numbers in plants by real-time PCR |
title_fullStr | Two-fold differences are the detection limit for determining transgene copy numbers in plants by real-time PCR |
title_full_unstemmed | Two-fold differences are the detection limit for determining transgene copy numbers in plants by real-time PCR |
title_short | Two-fold differences are the detection limit for determining transgene copy numbers in plants by real-time PCR |
title_sort | two-fold differences are the detection limit for determining transgene copy numbers in plants by real-time pcr |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC493272/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15251044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-4-14 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bubnerben twofolddifferencesarethedetectionlimitfordeterminingtransgenecopynumbersinplantsbyrealtimepcr AT gaseklaus twofolddifferencesarethedetectionlimitfordeterminingtransgenecopynumbersinplantsbyrealtimepcr AT baldwiniant twofolddifferencesarethedetectionlimitfordeterminingtransgenecopynumbersinplantsbyrealtimepcr |