Cargando…

Two-fold differences are the detection limit for determining transgene copy numbers in plants by real-time PCR

BACKGROUND: After transformation, plants that are homozygous and contain one copy of the transgene are typically selected for further study. If real-time PCR is to be used to determine copy number and zygosity, it must be able to distinguish hemizygous from homozygous and one-copy from two-copy plan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bubner, Ben, Gase, Klaus, Baldwin, Ian T
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC493272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15251044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-4-14
_version_ 1782121667921707008
author Bubner, Ben
Gase, Klaus
Baldwin, Ian T
author_facet Bubner, Ben
Gase, Klaus
Baldwin, Ian T
author_sort Bubner, Ben
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: After transformation, plants that are homozygous and contain one copy of the transgene are typically selected for further study. If real-time PCR is to be used to determine copy number and zygosity, it must be able to distinguish hemizygous from homozygous and one-copy from two-copy plants. That is, it must be able to detect two-fold differences. RESULTS: When transgenic Nicotiana attenuata plants which had been previously determined by Southern analysis to contain one or two copies of the transgene, were analyzed by real-time PCR (2(-ΔΔCt )method), the method failed to confirm the results from the Southern analysis. In a second data set we analyzed offspring of a hemizygous one-copy plant, which were expected to segregate into three groups of offspring in a 1:2:1 ratio: no transgene, hemizygous, homozygous. Because it was not possible to distinguish homozygous from hemizygous plants with real-time PCR, we could not verify this segregation ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Detection of two-fold differences by real-time PCR is essential if this procedure is to be used for the characterization of transgenic plants. However, given the high variability between replicates, a detection of two-fold differences is in many cases not possible; in such cases Southern analysis is the more reliable procedure.
format Text
id pubmed-493272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-4932722004-07-30 Two-fold differences are the detection limit for determining transgene copy numbers in plants by real-time PCR Bubner, Ben Gase, Klaus Baldwin, Ian T BMC Biotechnol Methodology Article BACKGROUND: After transformation, plants that are homozygous and contain one copy of the transgene are typically selected for further study. If real-time PCR is to be used to determine copy number and zygosity, it must be able to distinguish hemizygous from homozygous and one-copy from two-copy plants. That is, it must be able to detect two-fold differences. RESULTS: When transgenic Nicotiana attenuata plants which had been previously determined by Southern analysis to contain one or two copies of the transgene, were analyzed by real-time PCR (2(-ΔΔCt )method), the method failed to confirm the results from the Southern analysis. In a second data set we analyzed offspring of a hemizygous one-copy plant, which were expected to segregate into three groups of offspring in a 1:2:1 ratio: no transgene, hemizygous, homozygous. Because it was not possible to distinguish homozygous from hemizygous plants with real-time PCR, we could not verify this segregation ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Detection of two-fold differences by real-time PCR is essential if this procedure is to be used for the characterization of transgenic plants. However, given the high variability between replicates, a detection of two-fold differences is in many cases not possible; in such cases Southern analysis is the more reliable procedure. BioMed Central 2004-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC493272/ /pubmed/15251044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-4-14 Text en Copyright © 2004 Bubner et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Bubner, Ben
Gase, Klaus
Baldwin, Ian T
Two-fold differences are the detection limit for determining transgene copy numbers in plants by real-time PCR
title Two-fold differences are the detection limit for determining transgene copy numbers in plants by real-time PCR
title_full Two-fold differences are the detection limit for determining transgene copy numbers in plants by real-time PCR
title_fullStr Two-fold differences are the detection limit for determining transgene copy numbers in plants by real-time PCR
title_full_unstemmed Two-fold differences are the detection limit for determining transgene copy numbers in plants by real-time PCR
title_short Two-fold differences are the detection limit for determining transgene copy numbers in plants by real-time PCR
title_sort two-fold differences are the detection limit for determining transgene copy numbers in plants by real-time pcr
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC493272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15251044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-4-14
work_keys_str_mv AT bubnerben twofolddifferencesarethedetectionlimitfordeterminingtransgenecopynumbersinplantsbyrealtimepcr
AT gaseklaus twofolddifferencesarethedetectionlimitfordeterminingtransgenecopynumbersinplantsbyrealtimepcr
AT baldwiniant twofolddifferencesarethedetectionlimitfordeterminingtransgenecopynumbersinplantsbyrealtimepcr