Cargando…

A polyvalent influenza DNA vaccine applied by needle-free intradermal delivery induces cross-reactive humoral and cellular immune responses in pigs

BACKGROUND: Pigs are natural hosts for influenza A viruses, and the infection is widely prevalent in swine herds throughout the world. Current commercial influenza vaccines for pigs induce a narrow immune response and are not very effective against antigenically diverse viruses. To control influenza...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borggren, Marie, Nielsen, Jens, Karlsson, Ingrid, Dalgaard, Tina S., Trebbien, Ramona, Williams, James A., Fomsgaard, Anders
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4940207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27211039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.05.030
_version_ 1782442114939879424
author Borggren, Marie
Nielsen, Jens
Karlsson, Ingrid
Dalgaard, Tina S.
Trebbien, Ramona
Williams, James A.
Fomsgaard, Anders
author_facet Borggren, Marie
Nielsen, Jens
Karlsson, Ingrid
Dalgaard, Tina S.
Trebbien, Ramona
Williams, James A.
Fomsgaard, Anders
author_sort Borggren, Marie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pigs are natural hosts for influenza A viruses, and the infection is widely prevalent in swine herds throughout the world. Current commercial influenza vaccines for pigs induce a narrow immune response and are not very effective against antigenically diverse viruses. To control influenza in pigs, the development of more effective swine influenza vaccines inducing broader cross-protective immune responses is needed. Previously, we have shown that a polyvalent influenza DNA vaccine using vectors containing antibiotic resistance genes induced a broadly protective immune response in pigs and ferrets using intradermal injection followed by electroporation. However, this vaccination approach is not practical in large swine herds, and DNA vaccine vectors containing antibiotic resistance genes are undesirable. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the immunogenicity of an optimized version of our preceding polyvalent DNA vaccine, characterized by a next-generation expression vector without antibiotic resistance markers and delivered by a convenient needle-free intradermal application approach. METHODS: The humoral and cellular immune responses induced by three different doses of the optimized DNA vaccine were evaluated in groups of five to six pigs. The DNA vaccine consisted of six selected influenza genes of pandemic origin, including internally expressed matrix and nucleoprotein and externally expressed hemagglutinin and neuraminidase. RESULTS: Needle-free vaccination of growing pigs with the optimized DNA vaccine resulted in specific, dose-dependent immunity down to the lowest dose (200 μg DNA/vaccination). Both the antibody-mediated and the recall lymphocyte immune responses demonstrated high reactivity against vaccine-specific strains and cross-reactivity to vaccine-heterologous strains. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that polyvalent DNA influenza vaccination may provide a strong tool for broad protection against swine influenza strains threatening animal as well as public health. In addition, the needle-free administration technique used for this DNA vaccine will provide an easy and practical approach for the large-scale vaccination of swine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4940207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49402072016-07-18 A polyvalent influenza DNA vaccine applied by needle-free intradermal delivery induces cross-reactive humoral and cellular immune responses in pigs Borggren, Marie Nielsen, Jens Karlsson, Ingrid Dalgaard, Tina S. Trebbien, Ramona Williams, James A. Fomsgaard, Anders Vaccine Article BACKGROUND: Pigs are natural hosts for influenza A viruses, and the infection is widely prevalent in swine herds throughout the world. Current commercial influenza vaccines for pigs induce a narrow immune response and are not very effective against antigenically diverse viruses. To control influenza in pigs, the development of more effective swine influenza vaccines inducing broader cross-protective immune responses is needed. Previously, we have shown that a polyvalent influenza DNA vaccine using vectors containing antibiotic resistance genes induced a broadly protective immune response in pigs and ferrets using intradermal injection followed by electroporation. However, this vaccination approach is not practical in large swine herds, and DNA vaccine vectors containing antibiotic resistance genes are undesirable. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the immunogenicity of an optimized version of our preceding polyvalent DNA vaccine, characterized by a next-generation expression vector without antibiotic resistance markers and delivered by a convenient needle-free intradermal application approach. METHODS: The humoral and cellular immune responses induced by three different doses of the optimized DNA vaccine were evaluated in groups of five to six pigs. The DNA vaccine consisted of six selected influenza genes of pandemic origin, including internally expressed matrix and nucleoprotein and externally expressed hemagglutinin and neuraminidase. RESULTS: Needle-free vaccination of growing pigs with the optimized DNA vaccine resulted in specific, dose-dependent immunity down to the lowest dose (200 μg DNA/vaccination). Both the antibody-mediated and the recall lymphocyte immune responses demonstrated high reactivity against vaccine-specific strains and cross-reactivity to vaccine-heterologous strains. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that polyvalent DNA influenza vaccination may provide a strong tool for broad protection against swine influenza strains threatening animal as well as public health. In addition, the needle-free administration technique used for this DNA vaccine will provide an easy and practical approach for the large-scale vaccination of swine. Elsevier Science 2016-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4940207/ /pubmed/27211039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.05.030 Text en © 2016 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Borggren, Marie
Nielsen, Jens
Karlsson, Ingrid
Dalgaard, Tina S.
Trebbien, Ramona
Williams, James A.
Fomsgaard, Anders
A polyvalent influenza DNA vaccine applied by needle-free intradermal delivery induces cross-reactive humoral and cellular immune responses in pigs
title A polyvalent influenza DNA vaccine applied by needle-free intradermal delivery induces cross-reactive humoral and cellular immune responses in pigs
title_full A polyvalent influenza DNA vaccine applied by needle-free intradermal delivery induces cross-reactive humoral and cellular immune responses in pigs
title_fullStr A polyvalent influenza DNA vaccine applied by needle-free intradermal delivery induces cross-reactive humoral and cellular immune responses in pigs
title_full_unstemmed A polyvalent influenza DNA vaccine applied by needle-free intradermal delivery induces cross-reactive humoral and cellular immune responses in pigs
title_short A polyvalent influenza DNA vaccine applied by needle-free intradermal delivery induces cross-reactive humoral and cellular immune responses in pigs
title_sort polyvalent influenza dna vaccine applied by needle-free intradermal delivery induces cross-reactive humoral and cellular immune responses in pigs
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4940207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27211039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.05.030
work_keys_str_mv AT borggrenmarie apolyvalentinfluenzadnavaccineappliedbyneedlefreeintradermaldeliveryinducescrossreactivehumoralandcellularimmuneresponsesinpigs
AT nielsenjens apolyvalentinfluenzadnavaccineappliedbyneedlefreeintradermaldeliveryinducescrossreactivehumoralandcellularimmuneresponsesinpigs
AT karlssoningrid apolyvalentinfluenzadnavaccineappliedbyneedlefreeintradermaldeliveryinducescrossreactivehumoralandcellularimmuneresponsesinpigs
AT dalgaardtinas apolyvalentinfluenzadnavaccineappliedbyneedlefreeintradermaldeliveryinducescrossreactivehumoralandcellularimmuneresponsesinpigs
AT trebbienramona apolyvalentinfluenzadnavaccineappliedbyneedlefreeintradermaldeliveryinducescrossreactivehumoralandcellularimmuneresponsesinpigs
AT williamsjamesa apolyvalentinfluenzadnavaccineappliedbyneedlefreeintradermaldeliveryinducescrossreactivehumoralandcellularimmuneresponsesinpigs
AT fomsgaardanders apolyvalentinfluenzadnavaccineappliedbyneedlefreeintradermaldeliveryinducescrossreactivehumoralandcellularimmuneresponsesinpigs
AT borggrenmarie polyvalentinfluenzadnavaccineappliedbyneedlefreeintradermaldeliveryinducescrossreactivehumoralandcellularimmuneresponsesinpigs
AT nielsenjens polyvalentinfluenzadnavaccineappliedbyneedlefreeintradermaldeliveryinducescrossreactivehumoralandcellularimmuneresponsesinpigs
AT karlssoningrid polyvalentinfluenzadnavaccineappliedbyneedlefreeintradermaldeliveryinducescrossreactivehumoralandcellularimmuneresponsesinpigs
AT dalgaardtinas polyvalentinfluenzadnavaccineappliedbyneedlefreeintradermaldeliveryinducescrossreactivehumoralandcellularimmuneresponsesinpigs
AT trebbienramona polyvalentinfluenzadnavaccineappliedbyneedlefreeintradermaldeliveryinducescrossreactivehumoralandcellularimmuneresponsesinpigs
AT williamsjamesa polyvalentinfluenzadnavaccineappliedbyneedlefreeintradermaldeliveryinducescrossreactivehumoralandcellularimmuneresponsesinpigs
AT fomsgaardanders polyvalentinfluenzadnavaccineappliedbyneedlefreeintradermaldeliveryinducescrossreactivehumoralandcellularimmuneresponsesinpigs