Cargando…
Mutation load under additive fitness effects
Under the traditional mutation load model based on multiplicative fitness effects, the load in a population is 1−e(−U), where U is the genomic deleterious mutation rate. Because this load becomes high under large U, synergistic epistasis has been proposed as one possible means of reducing the load....
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4957254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26788801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0016672314000226 |
_version_ | 1782444147132596224 |
---|---|
author | BERGEN, ANDREW C. |
author_facet | BERGEN, ANDREW C. |
author_sort | BERGEN, ANDREW C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Under the traditional mutation load model based on multiplicative fitness effects, the load in a population is 1−e(−U), where U is the genomic deleterious mutation rate. Because this load becomes high under large U, synergistic epistasis has been proposed as one possible means of reducing the load. However, experiments on model organisms attempting to detect synergistic epistasis have often focused on a quadratic fitness model, with the resulting general conclusion being that epistasis is neither common nor strong. Here, I present a model of additive fitness effects and show that, unlike multiplicative effects, the equilibrium frequency of an allele under additivity is dependent on the average absolute fitness of the population. The additive model then results in a load of U/(U +1), which is much lower than 1−e(−U) for large U. Numerical iterations demonstrate that this analytic derivation holds as a good approximation under biologically relevant values of selection coefficients and U. Additionally, regressions onto Drosophila mutation accumulation data suggest that the common method of inferring epistasis by detecting large quadratic terms from regressions is not always necessary, as the additive model fits the data well and results in synergistic epistasis. Furthermore, the additive model gives a much larger reduction in load than the quadratic model when predicted from the same data, indicating that it is important to consider this additive model in addition to the quadratic model when inferring epistasis from mutation accumulation data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4957254 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49572542016-08-03 Mutation load under additive fitness effects BERGEN, ANDREW C. Genet Res (Camb) Research Papers Under the traditional mutation load model based on multiplicative fitness effects, the load in a population is 1−e(−U), where U is the genomic deleterious mutation rate. Because this load becomes high under large U, synergistic epistasis has been proposed as one possible means of reducing the load. However, experiments on model organisms attempting to detect synergistic epistasis have often focused on a quadratic fitness model, with the resulting general conclusion being that epistasis is neither common nor strong. Here, I present a model of additive fitness effects and show that, unlike multiplicative effects, the equilibrium frequency of an allele under additivity is dependent on the average absolute fitness of the population. The additive model then results in a load of U/(U +1), which is much lower than 1−e(−U) for large U. Numerical iterations demonstrate that this analytic derivation holds as a good approximation under biologically relevant values of selection coefficients and U. Additionally, regressions onto Drosophila mutation accumulation data suggest that the common method of inferring epistasis by detecting large quadratic terms from regressions is not always necessary, as the additive model fits the data well and results in synergistic epistasis. Furthermore, the additive model gives a much larger reduction in load than the quadratic model when predicted from the same data, indicating that it is important to consider this additive model in addition to the quadratic model when inferring epistasis from mutation accumulation data. Cambridge University Press 2015-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4957254/ /pubmed/26788801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0016672314000226 Text en © Cambridge University Press 2015 This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Papers BERGEN, ANDREW C. Mutation load under additive fitness effects |
title | Mutation load under additive fitness effects |
title_full | Mutation load under additive fitness effects |
title_fullStr | Mutation load under additive fitness effects |
title_full_unstemmed | Mutation load under additive fitness effects |
title_short | Mutation load under additive fitness effects |
title_sort | mutation load under additive fitness effects |
topic | Research Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4957254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26788801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0016672314000226 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bergenandrewc mutationloadunderadditivefitnesseffects |