Cargando…

Mutation load under additive fitness effects

Under the traditional mutation load model based on multiplicative fitness effects, the load in a population is 1−e(−U), where U is the genomic deleterious mutation rate. Because this load becomes high under large U, synergistic epistasis has been proposed as one possible means of reducing the load....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: BERGEN, ANDREW C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4957254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26788801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0016672314000226
_version_ 1782444147132596224
author BERGEN, ANDREW C.
author_facet BERGEN, ANDREW C.
author_sort BERGEN, ANDREW C.
collection PubMed
description Under the traditional mutation load model based on multiplicative fitness effects, the load in a population is 1−e(−U), where U is the genomic deleterious mutation rate. Because this load becomes high under large U, synergistic epistasis has been proposed as one possible means of reducing the load. However, experiments on model organisms attempting to detect synergistic epistasis have often focused on a quadratic fitness model, with the resulting general conclusion being that epistasis is neither common nor strong. Here, I present a model of additive fitness effects and show that, unlike multiplicative effects, the equilibrium frequency of an allele under additivity is dependent on the average absolute fitness of the population. The additive model then results in a load of U/(U +1), which is much lower than 1−e(−U) for large U. Numerical iterations demonstrate that this analytic derivation holds as a good approximation under biologically relevant values of selection coefficients and U. Additionally, regressions onto Drosophila mutation accumulation data suggest that the common method of inferring epistasis by detecting large quadratic terms from regressions is not always necessary, as the additive model fits the data well and results in synergistic epistasis. Furthermore, the additive model gives a much larger reduction in load than the quadratic model when predicted from the same data, indicating that it is important to consider this additive model in addition to the quadratic model when inferring epistasis from mutation accumulation data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4957254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49572542016-08-03 Mutation load under additive fitness effects BERGEN, ANDREW C. Genet Res (Camb) Research Papers Under the traditional mutation load model based on multiplicative fitness effects, the load in a population is 1−e(−U), where U is the genomic deleterious mutation rate. Because this load becomes high under large U, synergistic epistasis has been proposed as one possible means of reducing the load. However, experiments on model organisms attempting to detect synergistic epistasis have often focused on a quadratic fitness model, with the resulting general conclusion being that epistasis is neither common nor strong. Here, I present a model of additive fitness effects and show that, unlike multiplicative effects, the equilibrium frequency of an allele under additivity is dependent on the average absolute fitness of the population. The additive model then results in a load of U/(U +1), which is much lower than 1−e(−U) for large U. Numerical iterations demonstrate that this analytic derivation holds as a good approximation under biologically relevant values of selection coefficients and U. Additionally, regressions onto Drosophila mutation accumulation data suggest that the common method of inferring epistasis by detecting large quadratic terms from regressions is not always necessary, as the additive model fits the data well and results in synergistic epistasis. Furthermore, the additive model gives a much larger reduction in load than the quadratic model when predicted from the same data, indicating that it is important to consider this additive model in addition to the quadratic model when inferring epistasis from mutation accumulation data. Cambridge University Press 2015-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4957254/ /pubmed/26788801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0016672314000226 Text en © Cambridge University Press 2015 This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Papers
BERGEN, ANDREW C.
Mutation load under additive fitness effects
title Mutation load under additive fitness effects
title_full Mutation load under additive fitness effects
title_fullStr Mutation load under additive fitness effects
title_full_unstemmed Mutation load under additive fitness effects
title_short Mutation load under additive fitness effects
title_sort mutation load under additive fitness effects
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4957254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26788801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0016672314000226
work_keys_str_mv AT bergenandrewc mutationloadunderadditivefitnesseffects