Cargando…

Bioethics education in clinical settings: theory and practice of the dilemma method of moral case deliberation

BACKGROUND: Moral Case Deliberation is a specific form of bioethics education fostering professionals’ moral competence in order to deal with their moral questions. So far, few studies focus in detail on Moral Case Deliberation methodologies and their didactic principles. The dilemma method is a str...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stolper, Margreet, Molewijk, Bert, Widdershoven, Guy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4957934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27448597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0125-1
_version_ 1782444253591371776
author Stolper, Margreet
Molewijk, Bert
Widdershoven, Guy
author_facet Stolper, Margreet
Molewijk, Bert
Widdershoven, Guy
author_sort Stolper, Margreet
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Moral Case Deliberation is a specific form of bioethics education fostering professionals’ moral competence in order to deal with their moral questions. So far, few studies focus in detail on Moral Case Deliberation methodologies and their didactic principles. The dilemma method is a structured and frequently used method in Moral Case Deliberation that stimulates methodological reflection and reasoning through a systematic dialogue on an ethical issue experienced in practice. METHODS: In this paper we present a case-study of a Moral Case Deliberation with the dilemma method in a health care institution for people with an intellectual disability, describing the theoretical background and the practical application of the dilemma method. The dilemma method focuses on moral experiences of participants concerning a concrete dilemma in practice. By an in-depth description of each of the steps of the deliberation process, we elucidate the educational value and didactics of this specific method. RESULTS: The didactics and methodical steps of the dilemma method both supported and structured the dialogical reflection process of the participants. The process shows that the participants learned to recognize the moral dimension of the issue at stake and were able to distinguish various perspectives and reasons in a systematic manner. The facilitator played an important role in the learning process of the participants, by assisting them in focusing on and exploring moral aspects of the case. DISCUSSION: The reflection and learning process, experienced by the participants, shows competency-based characteristics. The role of the facilitator is that of a Socratic teacher with specific knowledge and skills, fostering reflection, inquiry and dialogue. CONCLUSION: The specific didactics of the dilemma method is well suited for teaching bioethics in clinical settings. The dilemma method follows an inductive learning approach through a dialogical moral inquiry in which participants develop not only knowledge but also skills, attitude and character. The role of a trained facilitator and a specific view on teaching and practicing ethics are essential when using the dilemma method in teaching health care professionals how to reflect on their own moral issues in practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4957934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49579342016-07-23 Bioethics education in clinical settings: theory and practice of the dilemma method of moral case deliberation Stolper, Margreet Molewijk, Bert Widdershoven, Guy BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: Moral Case Deliberation is a specific form of bioethics education fostering professionals’ moral competence in order to deal with their moral questions. So far, few studies focus in detail on Moral Case Deliberation methodologies and their didactic principles. The dilemma method is a structured and frequently used method in Moral Case Deliberation that stimulates methodological reflection and reasoning through a systematic dialogue on an ethical issue experienced in practice. METHODS: In this paper we present a case-study of a Moral Case Deliberation with the dilemma method in a health care institution for people with an intellectual disability, describing the theoretical background and the practical application of the dilemma method. The dilemma method focuses on moral experiences of participants concerning a concrete dilemma in practice. By an in-depth description of each of the steps of the deliberation process, we elucidate the educational value and didactics of this specific method. RESULTS: The didactics and methodical steps of the dilemma method both supported and structured the dialogical reflection process of the participants. The process shows that the participants learned to recognize the moral dimension of the issue at stake and were able to distinguish various perspectives and reasons in a systematic manner. The facilitator played an important role in the learning process of the participants, by assisting them in focusing on and exploring moral aspects of the case. DISCUSSION: The reflection and learning process, experienced by the participants, shows competency-based characteristics. The role of the facilitator is that of a Socratic teacher with specific knowledge and skills, fostering reflection, inquiry and dialogue. CONCLUSION: The specific didactics of the dilemma method is well suited for teaching bioethics in clinical settings. The dilemma method follows an inductive learning approach through a dialogical moral inquiry in which participants develop not only knowledge but also skills, attitude and character. The role of a trained facilitator and a specific view on teaching and practicing ethics are essential when using the dilemma method in teaching health care professionals how to reflect on their own moral issues in practice. BioMed Central 2016-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4957934/ /pubmed/27448597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0125-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stolper, Margreet
Molewijk, Bert
Widdershoven, Guy
Bioethics education in clinical settings: theory and practice of the dilemma method of moral case deliberation
title Bioethics education in clinical settings: theory and practice of the dilemma method of moral case deliberation
title_full Bioethics education in clinical settings: theory and practice of the dilemma method of moral case deliberation
title_fullStr Bioethics education in clinical settings: theory and practice of the dilemma method of moral case deliberation
title_full_unstemmed Bioethics education in clinical settings: theory and practice of the dilemma method of moral case deliberation
title_short Bioethics education in clinical settings: theory and practice of the dilemma method of moral case deliberation
title_sort bioethics education in clinical settings: theory and practice of the dilemma method of moral case deliberation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4957934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27448597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0125-1
work_keys_str_mv AT stolpermargreet bioethicseducationinclinicalsettingstheoryandpracticeofthedilemmamethodofmoralcasedeliberation
AT molewijkbert bioethicseducationinclinicalsettingstheoryandpracticeofthedilemmamethodofmoralcasedeliberation
AT widdershovenguy bioethicseducationinclinicalsettingstheoryandpracticeofthedilemmamethodofmoralcasedeliberation