Cargando…
Allosteric Nanobodies Reveal the Dynamic Range and Diverse Mechanisms of GPCR Activation
G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) modulate many physiological processes by transducing a variety of extracellular cues into intracellular responses. Ligand binding to an extracellular orthosteric pocket propagates conformational change to the receptor cytosolic region to promote binding and activa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4961583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27409812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature18636 |
_version_ | 1782444683606097920 |
---|---|
author | Staus, Dean P Strachan, Ryan T Manglik, Aashish Pani, Biswaranjan Kahsai, Alem W Kim, Tae Hun Wingler, Laura M Ahn, Seungkirl Chatterjee, Arnab Masoudi, Ali Kruse, Andrew C Pardon, Els Steyaert, Jan Weis, William I Prosser, R. Scott Kobilka, Brian K Costa, Tommaso Lefkowitz, Robert J |
author_facet | Staus, Dean P Strachan, Ryan T Manglik, Aashish Pani, Biswaranjan Kahsai, Alem W Kim, Tae Hun Wingler, Laura M Ahn, Seungkirl Chatterjee, Arnab Masoudi, Ali Kruse, Andrew C Pardon, Els Steyaert, Jan Weis, William I Prosser, R. Scott Kobilka, Brian K Costa, Tommaso Lefkowitz, Robert J |
author_sort | Staus, Dean P |
collection | PubMed |
description | G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) modulate many physiological processes by transducing a variety of extracellular cues into intracellular responses. Ligand binding to an extracellular orthosteric pocket propagates conformational change to the receptor cytosolic region to promote binding and activation of downstream signaling effectors such as G proteins and β-arrestins. It is widely appreciated that different agonists can share the same binding pocket but evoke unique receptor conformations leading to a wide range of downstream responses (i.e., ‘efficacy’)(1). Furthermore, mounting biophysical evidence, primarily using the β-adrenergic receptor (β(2)AR) as a model system, supports the existence of multiple active and inactive conformational states(2–5). However, how agonists with varying efficacy modulate these receptor states to initiate cellular responses is not well understood. Here we report stabilization of two distinct β(2)AR conformations using single domain camelid antibodies (nanobodies): a previously described positive allosteric nanobody (Nb80) and a newly identified negative allosteric nanobody (Nb60)(6,7). We show that Nb60 stabilizes a previously unappreciated low affinity receptor state which corresponds to one of two inactive receptor conformations as delineated by X-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy. We find that the agonist isoproterenol has a 15,000-fold higher affinity for the β(2)AR in the presence of Nb80 compared to Nb60, highlighting the full allosteric range of a GPCR. Assessing the binding of 17 ligands of varying efficacy to the β(2)AR in the absence and presence of Nb60 or Nb80 reveals large ligand-specific effects that can only be explained using an allosteric model which assumes equilibrium amongst at least three receptor states. Agonists generally exert efficacy by stabilizing the active Nb80-stabilized receptor state (R(80)). In contrast, for a number of partial agonists, both stabilization of R(80) and destabilization of the inactive, Nb60-bound state (R(60)) contribute to their ability to modulate receptor activation. These data demonstrate that ligands can initiate a wide range of cellular responses by differentially stabilizing multiple receptor states. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4961583 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49615832017-01-21 Allosteric Nanobodies Reveal the Dynamic Range and Diverse Mechanisms of GPCR Activation Staus, Dean P Strachan, Ryan T Manglik, Aashish Pani, Biswaranjan Kahsai, Alem W Kim, Tae Hun Wingler, Laura M Ahn, Seungkirl Chatterjee, Arnab Masoudi, Ali Kruse, Andrew C Pardon, Els Steyaert, Jan Weis, William I Prosser, R. Scott Kobilka, Brian K Costa, Tommaso Lefkowitz, Robert J Nature Article G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) modulate many physiological processes by transducing a variety of extracellular cues into intracellular responses. Ligand binding to an extracellular orthosteric pocket propagates conformational change to the receptor cytosolic region to promote binding and activation of downstream signaling effectors such as G proteins and β-arrestins. It is widely appreciated that different agonists can share the same binding pocket but evoke unique receptor conformations leading to a wide range of downstream responses (i.e., ‘efficacy’)(1). Furthermore, mounting biophysical evidence, primarily using the β-adrenergic receptor (β(2)AR) as a model system, supports the existence of multiple active and inactive conformational states(2–5). However, how agonists with varying efficacy modulate these receptor states to initiate cellular responses is not well understood. Here we report stabilization of two distinct β(2)AR conformations using single domain camelid antibodies (nanobodies): a previously described positive allosteric nanobody (Nb80) and a newly identified negative allosteric nanobody (Nb60)(6,7). We show that Nb60 stabilizes a previously unappreciated low affinity receptor state which corresponds to one of two inactive receptor conformations as delineated by X-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy. We find that the agonist isoproterenol has a 15,000-fold higher affinity for the β(2)AR in the presence of Nb80 compared to Nb60, highlighting the full allosteric range of a GPCR. Assessing the binding of 17 ligands of varying efficacy to the β(2)AR in the absence and presence of Nb60 or Nb80 reveals large ligand-specific effects that can only be explained using an allosteric model which assumes equilibrium amongst at least three receptor states. Agonists generally exert efficacy by stabilizing the active Nb80-stabilized receptor state (R(80)). In contrast, for a number of partial agonists, both stabilization of R(80) and destabilization of the inactive, Nb60-bound state (R(60)) contribute to their ability to modulate receptor activation. These data demonstrate that ligands can initiate a wide range of cellular responses by differentially stabilizing multiple receptor states. 2016-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4961583/ /pubmed/27409812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature18636 Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms |
spellingShingle | Article Staus, Dean P Strachan, Ryan T Manglik, Aashish Pani, Biswaranjan Kahsai, Alem W Kim, Tae Hun Wingler, Laura M Ahn, Seungkirl Chatterjee, Arnab Masoudi, Ali Kruse, Andrew C Pardon, Els Steyaert, Jan Weis, William I Prosser, R. Scott Kobilka, Brian K Costa, Tommaso Lefkowitz, Robert J Allosteric Nanobodies Reveal the Dynamic Range and Diverse Mechanisms of GPCR Activation |
title | Allosteric Nanobodies Reveal the Dynamic Range and Diverse Mechanisms of GPCR Activation |
title_full | Allosteric Nanobodies Reveal the Dynamic Range and Diverse Mechanisms of GPCR Activation |
title_fullStr | Allosteric Nanobodies Reveal the Dynamic Range and Diverse Mechanisms of GPCR Activation |
title_full_unstemmed | Allosteric Nanobodies Reveal the Dynamic Range and Diverse Mechanisms of GPCR Activation |
title_short | Allosteric Nanobodies Reveal the Dynamic Range and Diverse Mechanisms of GPCR Activation |
title_sort | allosteric nanobodies reveal the dynamic range and diverse mechanisms of gpcr activation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4961583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27409812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature18636 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stausdeanp allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation AT strachanryant allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation AT manglikaashish allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation AT panibiswaranjan allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation AT kahsaialemw allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation AT kimtaehun allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation AT winglerlauram allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation AT ahnseungkirl allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation AT chatterjeearnab allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation AT masoudiali allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation AT kruseandrewc allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation AT pardonels allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation AT steyaertjan allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation AT weiswilliami allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation AT prosserrscott allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation AT kobilkabriank allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation AT costatommaso allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation AT lefkowitzrobertj allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation |