Cargando…

Allosteric Nanobodies Reveal the Dynamic Range and Diverse Mechanisms of GPCR Activation

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) modulate many physiological processes by transducing a variety of extracellular cues into intracellular responses. Ligand binding to an extracellular orthosteric pocket propagates conformational change to the receptor cytosolic region to promote binding and activa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Staus, Dean P, Strachan, Ryan T, Manglik, Aashish, Pani, Biswaranjan, Kahsai, Alem W, Kim, Tae Hun, Wingler, Laura M, Ahn, Seungkirl, Chatterjee, Arnab, Masoudi, Ali, Kruse, Andrew C, Pardon, Els, Steyaert, Jan, Weis, William I, Prosser, R. Scott, Kobilka, Brian K, Costa, Tommaso, Lefkowitz, Robert J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4961583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27409812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature18636
_version_ 1782444683606097920
author Staus, Dean P
Strachan, Ryan T
Manglik, Aashish
Pani, Biswaranjan
Kahsai, Alem W
Kim, Tae Hun
Wingler, Laura M
Ahn, Seungkirl
Chatterjee, Arnab
Masoudi, Ali
Kruse, Andrew C
Pardon, Els
Steyaert, Jan
Weis, William I
Prosser, R. Scott
Kobilka, Brian K
Costa, Tommaso
Lefkowitz, Robert J
author_facet Staus, Dean P
Strachan, Ryan T
Manglik, Aashish
Pani, Biswaranjan
Kahsai, Alem W
Kim, Tae Hun
Wingler, Laura M
Ahn, Seungkirl
Chatterjee, Arnab
Masoudi, Ali
Kruse, Andrew C
Pardon, Els
Steyaert, Jan
Weis, William I
Prosser, R. Scott
Kobilka, Brian K
Costa, Tommaso
Lefkowitz, Robert J
author_sort Staus, Dean P
collection PubMed
description G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) modulate many physiological processes by transducing a variety of extracellular cues into intracellular responses. Ligand binding to an extracellular orthosteric pocket propagates conformational change to the receptor cytosolic region to promote binding and activation of downstream signaling effectors such as G proteins and β-arrestins. It is widely appreciated that different agonists can share the same binding pocket but evoke unique receptor conformations leading to a wide range of downstream responses (i.e., ‘efficacy’)(1). Furthermore, mounting biophysical evidence, primarily using the β-adrenergic receptor (β(2)AR) as a model system, supports the existence of multiple active and inactive conformational states(2–5). However, how agonists with varying efficacy modulate these receptor states to initiate cellular responses is not well understood. Here we report stabilization of two distinct β(2)AR conformations using single domain camelid antibodies (nanobodies): a previously described positive allosteric nanobody (Nb80) and a newly identified negative allosteric nanobody (Nb60)(6,7). We show that Nb60 stabilizes a previously unappreciated low affinity receptor state which corresponds to one of two inactive receptor conformations as delineated by X-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy. We find that the agonist isoproterenol has a 15,000-fold higher affinity for the β(2)AR in the presence of Nb80 compared to Nb60, highlighting the full allosteric range of a GPCR. Assessing the binding of 17 ligands of varying efficacy to the β(2)AR in the absence and presence of Nb60 or Nb80 reveals large ligand-specific effects that can only be explained using an allosteric model which assumes equilibrium amongst at least three receptor states. Agonists generally exert efficacy by stabilizing the active Nb80-stabilized receptor state (R(80)). In contrast, for a number of partial agonists, both stabilization of R(80) and destabilization of the inactive, Nb60-bound state (R(60)) contribute to their ability to modulate receptor activation. These data demonstrate that ligands can initiate a wide range of cellular responses by differentially stabilizing multiple receptor states.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4961583
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49615832017-01-21 Allosteric Nanobodies Reveal the Dynamic Range and Diverse Mechanisms of GPCR Activation Staus, Dean P Strachan, Ryan T Manglik, Aashish Pani, Biswaranjan Kahsai, Alem W Kim, Tae Hun Wingler, Laura M Ahn, Seungkirl Chatterjee, Arnab Masoudi, Ali Kruse, Andrew C Pardon, Els Steyaert, Jan Weis, William I Prosser, R. Scott Kobilka, Brian K Costa, Tommaso Lefkowitz, Robert J Nature Article G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) modulate many physiological processes by transducing a variety of extracellular cues into intracellular responses. Ligand binding to an extracellular orthosteric pocket propagates conformational change to the receptor cytosolic region to promote binding and activation of downstream signaling effectors such as G proteins and β-arrestins. It is widely appreciated that different agonists can share the same binding pocket but evoke unique receptor conformations leading to a wide range of downstream responses (i.e., ‘efficacy’)(1). Furthermore, mounting biophysical evidence, primarily using the β-adrenergic receptor (β(2)AR) as a model system, supports the existence of multiple active and inactive conformational states(2–5). However, how agonists with varying efficacy modulate these receptor states to initiate cellular responses is not well understood. Here we report stabilization of two distinct β(2)AR conformations using single domain camelid antibodies (nanobodies): a previously described positive allosteric nanobody (Nb80) and a newly identified negative allosteric nanobody (Nb60)(6,7). We show that Nb60 stabilizes a previously unappreciated low affinity receptor state which corresponds to one of two inactive receptor conformations as delineated by X-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy. We find that the agonist isoproterenol has a 15,000-fold higher affinity for the β(2)AR in the presence of Nb80 compared to Nb60, highlighting the full allosteric range of a GPCR. Assessing the binding of 17 ligands of varying efficacy to the β(2)AR in the absence and presence of Nb60 or Nb80 reveals large ligand-specific effects that can only be explained using an allosteric model which assumes equilibrium amongst at least three receptor states. Agonists generally exert efficacy by stabilizing the active Nb80-stabilized receptor state (R(80)). In contrast, for a number of partial agonists, both stabilization of R(80) and destabilization of the inactive, Nb60-bound state (R(60)) contribute to their ability to modulate receptor activation. These data demonstrate that ligands can initiate a wide range of cellular responses by differentially stabilizing multiple receptor states. 2016-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4961583/ /pubmed/27409812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature18636 Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Staus, Dean P
Strachan, Ryan T
Manglik, Aashish
Pani, Biswaranjan
Kahsai, Alem W
Kim, Tae Hun
Wingler, Laura M
Ahn, Seungkirl
Chatterjee, Arnab
Masoudi, Ali
Kruse, Andrew C
Pardon, Els
Steyaert, Jan
Weis, William I
Prosser, R. Scott
Kobilka, Brian K
Costa, Tommaso
Lefkowitz, Robert J
Allosteric Nanobodies Reveal the Dynamic Range and Diverse Mechanisms of GPCR Activation
title Allosteric Nanobodies Reveal the Dynamic Range and Diverse Mechanisms of GPCR Activation
title_full Allosteric Nanobodies Reveal the Dynamic Range and Diverse Mechanisms of GPCR Activation
title_fullStr Allosteric Nanobodies Reveal the Dynamic Range and Diverse Mechanisms of GPCR Activation
title_full_unstemmed Allosteric Nanobodies Reveal the Dynamic Range and Diverse Mechanisms of GPCR Activation
title_short Allosteric Nanobodies Reveal the Dynamic Range and Diverse Mechanisms of GPCR Activation
title_sort allosteric nanobodies reveal the dynamic range and diverse mechanisms of gpcr activation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4961583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27409812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature18636
work_keys_str_mv AT stausdeanp allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation
AT strachanryant allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation
AT manglikaashish allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation
AT panibiswaranjan allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation
AT kahsaialemw allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation
AT kimtaehun allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation
AT winglerlauram allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation
AT ahnseungkirl allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation
AT chatterjeearnab allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation
AT masoudiali allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation
AT kruseandrewc allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation
AT pardonels allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation
AT steyaertjan allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation
AT weiswilliami allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation
AT prosserrscott allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation
AT kobilkabriank allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation
AT costatommaso allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation
AT lefkowitzrobertj allostericnanobodiesrevealthedynamicrangeanddiversemechanismsofgpcractivation