Cargando…
An analysis of the impact of pre‐analytical factors on the urine proteome: Sample processing time, temperature, and proteolysis
PURPOSE: We have examined the impact of sample processing time delay, temperature, and the addition of protease inhibitors (PIs) on the urinary proteome and peptidome, an important aspect of biomarker studies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Ten urine samples from patients with varying pathologies were each di...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4964914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25400092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prca.201400079 |
_version_ | 1782445177126780928 |
---|---|
author | Hepburn, Sophie Cairns, David A. Jackson, David Craven, Rachel A. Riley, Beverley Hutchinson, Michelle Wood, Steven Smith, Matthew Welberry Thompson, Douglas Banks, Rosamonde E. |
author_facet | Hepburn, Sophie Cairns, David A. Jackson, David Craven, Rachel A. Riley, Beverley Hutchinson, Michelle Wood, Steven Smith, Matthew Welberry Thompson, Douglas Banks, Rosamonde E. |
author_sort | Hepburn, Sophie |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: We have examined the impact of sample processing time delay, temperature, and the addition of protease inhibitors (PIs) on the urinary proteome and peptidome, an important aspect of biomarker studies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Ten urine samples from patients with varying pathologies were each divided and PIs added to one‐half, with aliquots of each then processed and frozen immediately, or after a delay of 6 h at 4°C or room temperature (20–22°C), effectively yielding 60 samples in total. Samples were then analyzed by 2D‐PAGE, SELDI‐TOF‐MS, and immunoassay. RESULTS: Interindividual variability in profiles was the dominant feature in all analyses. Minimal changes were observed by 2D‐PAGE as a result of delay in processing, temperature, or PIs and no changes were seen in IgG, albumin, β(2)‐microglobulin, or α(1)‐microglobulin measured by immunoassay. Analysis of peptides showed clustering of some samples by presence/absence of PIs but the extent was very patient‐dependent with most samples showing minimal effects. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The extent of processing‐induced changes and the benefit of PI addition are patient‐ and sample‐dependent. A consistent processing methodology is essential within a study to avoid any confounding of the results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4964914 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49649142016-08-11 An analysis of the impact of pre‐analytical factors on the urine proteome: Sample processing time, temperature, and proteolysis Hepburn, Sophie Cairns, David A. Jackson, David Craven, Rachel A. Riley, Beverley Hutchinson, Michelle Wood, Steven Smith, Matthew Welberry Thompson, Douglas Banks, Rosamonde E. Proteomics Clin Appl Experimental PURPOSE: We have examined the impact of sample processing time delay, temperature, and the addition of protease inhibitors (PIs) on the urinary proteome and peptidome, an important aspect of biomarker studies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Ten urine samples from patients with varying pathologies were each divided and PIs added to one‐half, with aliquots of each then processed and frozen immediately, or after a delay of 6 h at 4°C or room temperature (20–22°C), effectively yielding 60 samples in total. Samples were then analyzed by 2D‐PAGE, SELDI‐TOF‐MS, and immunoassay. RESULTS: Interindividual variability in profiles was the dominant feature in all analyses. Minimal changes were observed by 2D‐PAGE as a result of delay in processing, temperature, or PIs and no changes were seen in IgG, albumin, β(2)‐microglobulin, or α(1)‐microglobulin measured by immunoassay. Analysis of peptides showed clustering of some samples by presence/absence of PIs but the extent was very patient‐dependent with most samples showing minimal effects. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The extent of processing‐induced changes and the benefit of PI addition are patient‐ and sample‐dependent. A consistent processing methodology is essential within a study to avoid any confounding of the results. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-02-26 2015-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4964914/ /pubmed/25400092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prca.201400079 Text en © 2014 The Authors PROTEOMICS Clinical Applications Published by Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Experimental Hepburn, Sophie Cairns, David A. Jackson, David Craven, Rachel A. Riley, Beverley Hutchinson, Michelle Wood, Steven Smith, Matthew Welberry Thompson, Douglas Banks, Rosamonde E. An analysis of the impact of pre‐analytical factors on the urine proteome: Sample processing time, temperature, and proteolysis |
title | An analysis of the impact of pre‐analytical factors on the urine proteome: Sample processing time, temperature, and proteolysis |
title_full | An analysis of the impact of pre‐analytical factors on the urine proteome: Sample processing time, temperature, and proteolysis |
title_fullStr | An analysis of the impact of pre‐analytical factors on the urine proteome: Sample processing time, temperature, and proteolysis |
title_full_unstemmed | An analysis of the impact of pre‐analytical factors on the urine proteome: Sample processing time, temperature, and proteolysis |
title_short | An analysis of the impact of pre‐analytical factors on the urine proteome: Sample processing time, temperature, and proteolysis |
title_sort | analysis of the impact of pre‐analytical factors on the urine proteome: sample processing time, temperature, and proteolysis |
topic | Experimental |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4964914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25400092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prca.201400079 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hepburnsophie ananalysisoftheimpactofpreanalyticalfactorsontheurineproteomesampleprocessingtimetemperatureandproteolysis AT cairnsdavida ananalysisoftheimpactofpreanalyticalfactorsontheurineproteomesampleprocessingtimetemperatureandproteolysis AT jacksondavid ananalysisoftheimpactofpreanalyticalfactorsontheurineproteomesampleprocessingtimetemperatureandproteolysis AT cravenrachela ananalysisoftheimpactofpreanalyticalfactorsontheurineproteomesampleprocessingtimetemperatureandproteolysis AT rileybeverley ananalysisoftheimpactofpreanalyticalfactorsontheurineproteomesampleprocessingtimetemperatureandproteolysis AT hutchinsonmichelle ananalysisoftheimpactofpreanalyticalfactorsontheurineproteomesampleprocessingtimetemperatureandproteolysis AT woodsteven ananalysisoftheimpactofpreanalyticalfactorsontheurineproteomesampleprocessingtimetemperatureandproteolysis AT smithmatthewwelberry ananalysisoftheimpactofpreanalyticalfactorsontheurineproteomesampleprocessingtimetemperatureandproteolysis AT thompsondouglas ananalysisoftheimpactofpreanalyticalfactorsontheurineproteomesampleprocessingtimetemperatureandproteolysis AT banksrosamondee ananalysisoftheimpactofpreanalyticalfactorsontheurineproteomesampleprocessingtimetemperatureandproteolysis AT hepburnsophie analysisoftheimpactofpreanalyticalfactorsontheurineproteomesampleprocessingtimetemperatureandproteolysis AT cairnsdavida analysisoftheimpactofpreanalyticalfactorsontheurineproteomesampleprocessingtimetemperatureandproteolysis AT jacksondavid analysisoftheimpactofpreanalyticalfactorsontheurineproteomesampleprocessingtimetemperatureandproteolysis AT cravenrachela analysisoftheimpactofpreanalyticalfactorsontheurineproteomesampleprocessingtimetemperatureandproteolysis AT rileybeverley analysisoftheimpactofpreanalyticalfactorsontheurineproteomesampleprocessingtimetemperatureandproteolysis AT hutchinsonmichelle analysisoftheimpactofpreanalyticalfactorsontheurineproteomesampleprocessingtimetemperatureandproteolysis AT woodsteven analysisoftheimpactofpreanalyticalfactorsontheurineproteomesampleprocessingtimetemperatureandproteolysis AT smithmatthewwelberry analysisoftheimpactofpreanalyticalfactorsontheurineproteomesampleprocessingtimetemperatureandproteolysis AT thompsondouglas analysisoftheimpactofpreanalyticalfactorsontheurineproteomesampleprocessingtimetemperatureandproteolysis AT banksrosamondee analysisoftheimpactofpreanalyticalfactorsontheurineproteomesampleprocessingtimetemperatureandproteolysis |