Cargando…
Optic Nerve Head Measurements With Optical Coherence Tomography: A Phantom-Based Study Reveals Differences Among Clinical Devices
PURPOSE: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) can monitor for glaucoma by measuring dimensions of the optic nerve head (ONH) cup and disc. Multiple clinical studies have shown that different OCT devices yield different estimates of retinal dimensions. We developed phantoms mimicking ONH morphology as...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4968925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27409500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-18738 |
_version_ | 1782445726504058880 |
---|---|
author | Agrawal, Anant Baxi, Jigesh Calhoun, William Chen, Chieh-Li Ishikawa, Hiroshi Schuman, Joel S. Wollstein, Gadi Hammer, Daniel X. |
author_facet | Agrawal, Anant Baxi, Jigesh Calhoun, William Chen, Chieh-Li Ishikawa, Hiroshi Schuman, Joel S. Wollstein, Gadi Hammer, Daniel X. |
author_sort | Agrawal, Anant |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) can monitor for glaucoma by measuring dimensions of the optic nerve head (ONH) cup and disc. Multiple clinical studies have shown that different OCT devices yield different estimates of retinal dimensions. We developed phantoms mimicking ONH morphology as a new way to compare ONH measurements from different clinical OCT devices. METHODS: Three phantoms were fabricated to model the ONH: One normal and two with glaucomatous anatomies. Phantoms were scanned with Stratus, RTVue, and Cirrus clinical devices, and with a laboratory OCT system as a reference. We analyzed device-reported ONH measurements of cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) and cup volume and compared them with offline measurements done manually and with a custom software algorithm, respectively. RESULTS: The mean absolute difference between clinical devices with device-reported measurements versus offline measurements was 0.082 vs. 0.013 for CDR and 0.044 mm(3) vs. 0.019 mm(3) for cup volume. Statistically significant differences between devices were present for 16 of 18 comparisons of device-reported measurements from the phantoms. Offline Cirrus measurements tended to be significantly different from those from Stratus and RTVue. CONCLUSIONS: The interdevice differences in CDR and cup volume are primarily caused by the devices' proprietary ONH analysis algorithms. The three devices yield more similar ONH measurements when a consistent offline analysis technique is applied. Scan pattern on the ONH also may be a factor in the measurement differences. This phantom-based study has provided unique insights into characteristics of OCT measurements of the ONH. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4968925 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49689252017-01-01 Optic Nerve Head Measurements With Optical Coherence Tomography: A Phantom-Based Study Reveals Differences Among Clinical Devices Agrawal, Anant Baxi, Jigesh Calhoun, William Chen, Chieh-Li Ishikawa, Hiroshi Schuman, Joel S. Wollstein, Gadi Hammer, Daniel X. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Articles PURPOSE: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) can monitor for glaucoma by measuring dimensions of the optic nerve head (ONH) cup and disc. Multiple clinical studies have shown that different OCT devices yield different estimates of retinal dimensions. We developed phantoms mimicking ONH morphology as a new way to compare ONH measurements from different clinical OCT devices. METHODS: Three phantoms were fabricated to model the ONH: One normal and two with glaucomatous anatomies. Phantoms were scanned with Stratus, RTVue, and Cirrus clinical devices, and with a laboratory OCT system as a reference. We analyzed device-reported ONH measurements of cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) and cup volume and compared them with offline measurements done manually and with a custom software algorithm, respectively. RESULTS: The mean absolute difference between clinical devices with device-reported measurements versus offline measurements was 0.082 vs. 0.013 for CDR and 0.044 mm(3) vs. 0.019 mm(3) for cup volume. Statistically significant differences between devices were present for 16 of 18 comparisons of device-reported measurements from the phantoms. Offline Cirrus measurements tended to be significantly different from those from Stratus and RTVue. CONCLUSIONS: The interdevice differences in CDR and cup volume are primarily caused by the devices' proprietary ONH analysis algorithms. The three devices yield more similar ONH measurements when a consistent offline analysis technique is applied. Scan pattern on the ONH also may be a factor in the measurement differences. This phantom-based study has provided unique insights into characteristics of OCT measurements of the ONH. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2016-07-13 2016-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4968925/ /pubmed/27409500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-18738 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Articles Agrawal, Anant Baxi, Jigesh Calhoun, William Chen, Chieh-Li Ishikawa, Hiroshi Schuman, Joel S. Wollstein, Gadi Hammer, Daniel X. Optic Nerve Head Measurements With Optical Coherence Tomography: A Phantom-Based Study Reveals Differences Among Clinical Devices |
title | Optic Nerve Head Measurements With Optical Coherence Tomography: A Phantom-Based Study Reveals Differences Among Clinical Devices |
title_full | Optic Nerve Head Measurements With Optical Coherence Tomography: A Phantom-Based Study Reveals Differences Among Clinical Devices |
title_fullStr | Optic Nerve Head Measurements With Optical Coherence Tomography: A Phantom-Based Study Reveals Differences Among Clinical Devices |
title_full_unstemmed | Optic Nerve Head Measurements With Optical Coherence Tomography: A Phantom-Based Study Reveals Differences Among Clinical Devices |
title_short | Optic Nerve Head Measurements With Optical Coherence Tomography: A Phantom-Based Study Reveals Differences Among Clinical Devices |
title_sort | optic nerve head measurements with optical coherence tomography: a phantom-based study reveals differences among clinical devices |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4968925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27409500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-18738 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT agrawalanant opticnerveheadmeasurementswithopticalcoherencetomographyaphantombasedstudyrevealsdifferencesamongclinicaldevices AT baxijigesh opticnerveheadmeasurementswithopticalcoherencetomographyaphantombasedstudyrevealsdifferencesamongclinicaldevices AT calhounwilliam opticnerveheadmeasurementswithopticalcoherencetomographyaphantombasedstudyrevealsdifferencesamongclinicaldevices AT chenchiehli opticnerveheadmeasurementswithopticalcoherencetomographyaphantombasedstudyrevealsdifferencesamongclinicaldevices AT ishikawahiroshi opticnerveheadmeasurementswithopticalcoherencetomographyaphantombasedstudyrevealsdifferencesamongclinicaldevices AT schumanjoels opticnerveheadmeasurementswithopticalcoherencetomographyaphantombasedstudyrevealsdifferencesamongclinicaldevices AT wollsteingadi opticnerveheadmeasurementswithopticalcoherencetomographyaphantombasedstudyrevealsdifferencesamongclinicaldevices AT hammerdanielx opticnerveheadmeasurementswithopticalcoherencetomographyaphantombasedstudyrevealsdifferencesamongclinicaldevices |