Cargando…

Optic Nerve Head Measurements With Optical Coherence Tomography: A Phantom-Based Study Reveals Differences Among Clinical Devices

PURPOSE: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) can monitor for glaucoma by measuring dimensions of the optic nerve head (ONH) cup and disc. Multiple clinical studies have shown that different OCT devices yield different estimates of retinal dimensions. We developed phantoms mimicking ONH morphology as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agrawal, Anant, Baxi, Jigesh, Calhoun, William, Chen, Chieh-Li, Ishikawa, Hiroshi, Schuman, Joel S., Wollstein, Gadi, Hammer, Daniel X.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4968925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27409500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-18738
_version_ 1782445726504058880
author Agrawal, Anant
Baxi, Jigesh
Calhoun, William
Chen, Chieh-Li
Ishikawa, Hiroshi
Schuman, Joel S.
Wollstein, Gadi
Hammer, Daniel X.
author_facet Agrawal, Anant
Baxi, Jigesh
Calhoun, William
Chen, Chieh-Li
Ishikawa, Hiroshi
Schuman, Joel S.
Wollstein, Gadi
Hammer, Daniel X.
author_sort Agrawal, Anant
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) can monitor for glaucoma by measuring dimensions of the optic nerve head (ONH) cup and disc. Multiple clinical studies have shown that different OCT devices yield different estimates of retinal dimensions. We developed phantoms mimicking ONH morphology as a new way to compare ONH measurements from different clinical OCT devices. METHODS: Three phantoms were fabricated to model the ONH: One normal and two with glaucomatous anatomies. Phantoms were scanned with Stratus, RTVue, and Cirrus clinical devices, and with a laboratory OCT system as a reference. We analyzed device-reported ONH measurements of cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) and cup volume and compared them with offline measurements done manually and with a custom software algorithm, respectively. RESULTS: The mean absolute difference between clinical devices with device-reported measurements versus offline measurements was 0.082 vs. 0.013 for CDR and 0.044 mm(3) vs. 0.019 mm(3) for cup volume. Statistically significant differences between devices were present for 16 of 18 comparisons of device-reported measurements from the phantoms. Offline Cirrus measurements tended to be significantly different from those from Stratus and RTVue. CONCLUSIONS: The interdevice differences in CDR and cup volume are primarily caused by the devices' proprietary ONH analysis algorithms. The three devices yield more similar ONH measurements when a consistent offline analysis technique is applied. Scan pattern on the ONH also may be a factor in the measurement differences. This phantom-based study has provided unique insights into characteristics of OCT measurements of the ONH.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4968925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49689252017-01-01 Optic Nerve Head Measurements With Optical Coherence Tomography: A Phantom-Based Study Reveals Differences Among Clinical Devices Agrawal, Anant Baxi, Jigesh Calhoun, William Chen, Chieh-Li Ishikawa, Hiroshi Schuman, Joel S. Wollstein, Gadi Hammer, Daniel X. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Articles PURPOSE: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) can monitor for glaucoma by measuring dimensions of the optic nerve head (ONH) cup and disc. Multiple clinical studies have shown that different OCT devices yield different estimates of retinal dimensions. We developed phantoms mimicking ONH morphology as a new way to compare ONH measurements from different clinical OCT devices. METHODS: Three phantoms were fabricated to model the ONH: One normal and two with glaucomatous anatomies. Phantoms were scanned with Stratus, RTVue, and Cirrus clinical devices, and with a laboratory OCT system as a reference. We analyzed device-reported ONH measurements of cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) and cup volume and compared them with offline measurements done manually and with a custom software algorithm, respectively. RESULTS: The mean absolute difference between clinical devices with device-reported measurements versus offline measurements was 0.082 vs. 0.013 for CDR and 0.044 mm(3) vs. 0.019 mm(3) for cup volume. Statistically significant differences between devices were present for 16 of 18 comparisons of device-reported measurements from the phantoms. Offline Cirrus measurements tended to be significantly different from those from Stratus and RTVue. CONCLUSIONS: The interdevice differences in CDR and cup volume are primarily caused by the devices' proprietary ONH analysis algorithms. The three devices yield more similar ONH measurements when a consistent offline analysis technique is applied. Scan pattern on the ONH also may be a factor in the measurement differences. This phantom-based study has provided unique insights into characteristics of OCT measurements of the ONH. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2016-07-13 2016-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4968925/ /pubmed/27409500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-18738 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Articles
Agrawal, Anant
Baxi, Jigesh
Calhoun, William
Chen, Chieh-Li
Ishikawa, Hiroshi
Schuman, Joel S.
Wollstein, Gadi
Hammer, Daniel X.
Optic Nerve Head Measurements With Optical Coherence Tomography: A Phantom-Based Study Reveals Differences Among Clinical Devices
title Optic Nerve Head Measurements With Optical Coherence Tomography: A Phantom-Based Study Reveals Differences Among Clinical Devices
title_full Optic Nerve Head Measurements With Optical Coherence Tomography: A Phantom-Based Study Reveals Differences Among Clinical Devices
title_fullStr Optic Nerve Head Measurements With Optical Coherence Tomography: A Phantom-Based Study Reveals Differences Among Clinical Devices
title_full_unstemmed Optic Nerve Head Measurements With Optical Coherence Tomography: A Phantom-Based Study Reveals Differences Among Clinical Devices
title_short Optic Nerve Head Measurements With Optical Coherence Tomography: A Phantom-Based Study Reveals Differences Among Clinical Devices
title_sort optic nerve head measurements with optical coherence tomography: a phantom-based study reveals differences among clinical devices
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4968925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27409500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-18738
work_keys_str_mv AT agrawalanant opticnerveheadmeasurementswithopticalcoherencetomographyaphantombasedstudyrevealsdifferencesamongclinicaldevices
AT baxijigesh opticnerveheadmeasurementswithopticalcoherencetomographyaphantombasedstudyrevealsdifferencesamongclinicaldevices
AT calhounwilliam opticnerveheadmeasurementswithopticalcoherencetomographyaphantombasedstudyrevealsdifferencesamongclinicaldevices
AT chenchiehli opticnerveheadmeasurementswithopticalcoherencetomographyaphantombasedstudyrevealsdifferencesamongclinicaldevices
AT ishikawahiroshi opticnerveheadmeasurementswithopticalcoherencetomographyaphantombasedstudyrevealsdifferencesamongclinicaldevices
AT schumanjoels opticnerveheadmeasurementswithopticalcoherencetomographyaphantombasedstudyrevealsdifferencesamongclinicaldevices
AT wollsteingadi opticnerveheadmeasurementswithopticalcoherencetomographyaphantombasedstudyrevealsdifferencesamongclinicaldevices
AT hammerdanielx opticnerveheadmeasurementswithopticalcoherencetomographyaphantombasedstudyrevealsdifferencesamongclinicaldevices