Cargando…

Does video feedback analysis improve CPR performance in phase 5 medical students?

BACKGROUND: The use of simulation in medical education is increasing, with students taught and assessed using simulated patients and manikins. Medical students at Queen’s University of Belfast are taught advanced life support cardiopulmonary resuscitation as part of the undergraduate curriculum. Tea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spence, Andrew D., Derbyshire, Sonia, Walsh, Ian K., Murray, James M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4983021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27519273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0726-x
_version_ 1782447843884138496
author Spence, Andrew D.
Derbyshire, Sonia
Walsh, Ian K.
Murray, James M.
author_facet Spence, Andrew D.
Derbyshire, Sonia
Walsh, Ian K.
Murray, James M.
author_sort Spence, Andrew D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of simulation in medical education is increasing, with students taught and assessed using simulated patients and manikins. Medical students at Queen’s University of Belfast are taught advanced life support cardiopulmonary resuscitation as part of the undergraduate curriculum. Teaching and feedback in these skills have been developed in Queen’s University with high-fidelity manikins. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of video compared to verbal feedback in assessment of student cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance. METHODS: Final year students participated in this study using a high-fidelity manikin, in the Clinical Skills Centre, Queen’s University Belfast. Cohort A received verbal feedback only on their performance and cohort B received video feedback only. Video analysis using ‘StudioCode’ software was distributed to students. Each group returned for a second scenario and evaluation 4 weeks later. An assessment tool was created for performance assessment, which included individual skill and global score evaluation. RESULTS: One hundred thirty eight final year medical students completed the study. 62 % were female and the mean age was 23.9 years. Students having video feedback had significantly greater improvement in overall scores compared to those receiving verbal feedback (p = 0.006, 95 % CI: 2.8–15.8). Individual skills, including ventilation quality and global score were significantly better with video feedback (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively) when compared with cohort A. There was a positive change in overall score for cohort B from session one to session two (p < 0.001, 95 % CI: 6.3–15.8) indicating video feedback significantly benefited skill retention. In addition, using video feedback showed a significant improvement in the global score (p < 0.001, 95 % CI: 3.3–7.2) and drug administration timing (p = 0.004, 95 % CI: 0.7–3.8) of cohort B participants, from session one to session two. CONCLUSIONS: There is increased use of simulation in medicine but a paucity of published data comparing feedback methods in cardiopulmonary resuscitation training. Our study shows the use of video feedback when teaching cardiopulmonary resuscitation is more effective than verbal feedback, and enhances skill retention. This is one of the first studies to demonstrate the benefit of video feedback in cardiopulmonary resuscitation teaching. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0726-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4983021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49830212016-08-14 Does video feedback analysis improve CPR performance in phase 5 medical students? Spence, Andrew D. Derbyshire, Sonia Walsh, Ian K. Murray, James M. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: The use of simulation in medical education is increasing, with students taught and assessed using simulated patients and manikins. Medical students at Queen’s University of Belfast are taught advanced life support cardiopulmonary resuscitation as part of the undergraduate curriculum. Teaching and feedback in these skills have been developed in Queen’s University with high-fidelity manikins. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of video compared to verbal feedback in assessment of student cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance. METHODS: Final year students participated in this study using a high-fidelity manikin, in the Clinical Skills Centre, Queen’s University Belfast. Cohort A received verbal feedback only on their performance and cohort B received video feedback only. Video analysis using ‘StudioCode’ software was distributed to students. Each group returned for a second scenario and evaluation 4 weeks later. An assessment tool was created for performance assessment, which included individual skill and global score evaluation. RESULTS: One hundred thirty eight final year medical students completed the study. 62 % were female and the mean age was 23.9 years. Students having video feedback had significantly greater improvement in overall scores compared to those receiving verbal feedback (p = 0.006, 95 % CI: 2.8–15.8). Individual skills, including ventilation quality and global score were significantly better with video feedback (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively) when compared with cohort A. There was a positive change in overall score for cohort B from session one to session two (p < 0.001, 95 % CI: 6.3–15.8) indicating video feedback significantly benefited skill retention. In addition, using video feedback showed a significant improvement in the global score (p < 0.001, 95 % CI: 3.3–7.2) and drug administration timing (p = 0.004, 95 % CI: 0.7–3.8) of cohort B participants, from session one to session two. CONCLUSIONS: There is increased use of simulation in medicine but a paucity of published data comparing feedback methods in cardiopulmonary resuscitation training. Our study shows the use of video feedback when teaching cardiopulmonary resuscitation is more effective than verbal feedback, and enhances skill retention. This is one of the first studies to demonstrate the benefit of video feedback in cardiopulmonary resuscitation teaching. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0726-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4983021/ /pubmed/27519273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0726-x Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Spence, Andrew D.
Derbyshire, Sonia
Walsh, Ian K.
Murray, James M.
Does video feedback analysis improve CPR performance in phase 5 medical students?
title Does video feedback analysis improve CPR performance in phase 5 medical students?
title_full Does video feedback analysis improve CPR performance in phase 5 medical students?
title_fullStr Does video feedback analysis improve CPR performance in phase 5 medical students?
title_full_unstemmed Does video feedback analysis improve CPR performance in phase 5 medical students?
title_short Does video feedback analysis improve CPR performance in phase 5 medical students?
title_sort does video feedback analysis improve cpr performance in phase 5 medical students?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4983021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27519273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0726-x
work_keys_str_mv AT spenceandrewd doesvideofeedbackanalysisimprovecprperformanceinphase5medicalstudents
AT derbyshiresonia doesvideofeedbackanalysisimprovecprperformanceinphase5medicalstudents
AT walshiank doesvideofeedbackanalysisimprovecprperformanceinphase5medicalstudents
AT murrayjamesm doesvideofeedbackanalysisimprovecprperformanceinphase5medicalstudents