Cargando…
Active Learning Outside the Classroom: Implementation and Outcomes of Peer-Led Team-Learning Workshops in Introductory Biology
Study group meetings (SGMs) are voluntary-attendance peer-led team-learning workshops that supplement introductory biology lectures at a selective liberal arts college. While supporting all students’ engagement with lecture material, specific aims are to improve the success of underrepresented minor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Cell Biology
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5008878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27496361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0051 |
_version_ | 1782451456137232384 |
---|---|
author | Kudish, Philip Shores, Robin McClung, Alex Smulyan, Lisa Vallen, Elizabeth A. Siwicki, Kathleen K. |
author_facet | Kudish, Philip Shores, Robin McClung, Alex Smulyan, Lisa Vallen, Elizabeth A. Siwicki, Kathleen K. |
author_sort | Kudish, Philip |
collection | PubMed |
description | Study group meetings (SGMs) are voluntary-attendance peer-led team-learning workshops that supplement introductory biology lectures at a selective liberal arts college. While supporting all students’ engagement with lecture material, specific aims are to improve the success of underrepresented minority (URM) students and those with weaker backgrounds in biology. Peer leaders with experience in biology courses and training in science pedagogy facilitate work on faculty-generated challenge problems. During the eight semesters assessed in this study, URM students and those with less preparation attended SGMs with equal or greater frequency than their counterparts. Most agreed that SGMs enhanced their comprehension of biology and ability to articulate solutions. The historical grade gap between URM and non-URM students narrowed slightly in Biology 2, but not in other biology and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics courses. Nonetheless, URM students taking introductory biology after program implementation have graduated with biology majors or minors at the same rates as non-URM students, and have enrolled in postcollege degree programs at equal or greater rates. These results suggest that improved performance as measured by science grade point average may not be necessary to improve the persistence of students from underrepresented groups as life sciences majors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5008878 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | American Society for Cell Biology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50088782016-09-09 Active Learning Outside the Classroom: Implementation and Outcomes of Peer-Led Team-Learning Workshops in Introductory Biology Kudish, Philip Shores, Robin McClung, Alex Smulyan, Lisa Vallen, Elizabeth A. Siwicki, Kathleen K. CBE Life Sci Educ Article Study group meetings (SGMs) are voluntary-attendance peer-led team-learning workshops that supplement introductory biology lectures at a selective liberal arts college. While supporting all students’ engagement with lecture material, specific aims are to improve the success of underrepresented minority (URM) students and those with weaker backgrounds in biology. Peer leaders with experience in biology courses and training in science pedagogy facilitate work on faculty-generated challenge problems. During the eight semesters assessed in this study, URM students and those with less preparation attended SGMs with equal or greater frequency than their counterparts. Most agreed that SGMs enhanced their comprehension of biology and ability to articulate solutions. The historical grade gap between URM and non-URM students narrowed slightly in Biology 2, but not in other biology and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics courses. Nonetheless, URM students taking introductory biology after program implementation have graduated with biology majors or minors at the same rates as non-URM students, and have enrolled in postcollege degree programs at equal or greater rates. These results suggest that improved performance as measured by science grade point average may not be necessary to improve the persistence of students from underrepresented groups as life sciences majors. American Society for Cell Biology 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5008878/ /pubmed/27496361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0051 Text en © 2016 P. Kudish et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2016 The American Society for Cell Biology. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0). “ASCB®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology. |
spellingShingle | Article Kudish, Philip Shores, Robin McClung, Alex Smulyan, Lisa Vallen, Elizabeth A. Siwicki, Kathleen K. Active Learning Outside the Classroom: Implementation and Outcomes of Peer-Led Team-Learning Workshops in Introductory Biology |
title | Active Learning Outside the Classroom: Implementation and Outcomes of Peer-Led Team-Learning Workshops in Introductory Biology |
title_full | Active Learning Outside the Classroom: Implementation and Outcomes of Peer-Led Team-Learning Workshops in Introductory Biology |
title_fullStr | Active Learning Outside the Classroom: Implementation and Outcomes of Peer-Led Team-Learning Workshops in Introductory Biology |
title_full_unstemmed | Active Learning Outside the Classroom: Implementation and Outcomes of Peer-Led Team-Learning Workshops in Introductory Biology |
title_short | Active Learning Outside the Classroom: Implementation and Outcomes of Peer-Led Team-Learning Workshops in Introductory Biology |
title_sort | active learning outside the classroom: implementation and outcomes of peer-led team-learning workshops in introductory biology |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5008878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27496361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0051 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kudishphilip activelearningoutsidetheclassroomimplementationandoutcomesofpeerledteamlearningworkshopsinintroductorybiology AT shoresrobin activelearningoutsidetheclassroomimplementationandoutcomesofpeerledteamlearningworkshopsinintroductorybiology AT mcclungalex activelearningoutsidetheclassroomimplementationandoutcomesofpeerledteamlearningworkshopsinintroductorybiology AT smulyanlisa activelearningoutsidetheclassroomimplementationandoutcomesofpeerledteamlearningworkshopsinintroductorybiology AT vallenelizabetha activelearningoutsidetheclassroomimplementationandoutcomesofpeerledteamlearningworkshopsinintroductorybiology AT siwickikathleenk activelearningoutsidetheclassroomimplementationandoutcomesofpeerledteamlearningworkshopsinintroductorybiology |