Cargando…
Impact of including or excluding both-armed zero-event studies on using standard meta-analysis methods for rare event outcome: a simulation study
OBJECTIVES: There is no consensus on whether studies with no observed events in the treatment and control arms, the so-called both-armed zero-event studies, should be included in a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Current analytic approaches handled them differently depending on...
Autores principales: | Cheng, Ji, Pullenayegum, Eleanor, Marshall, John K, Iorio, Alfonso, Thabane, Lehana |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27531725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010983 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Bayesian approach to the assessment of the population-specific risk of inhibitors in hemophilia A patients: a case study
por: Cheng, Ji, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Treatment crossovers in time-to-event non-inferiority randomised trials of radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer
por: Parpia, Sameer, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Classifying Included and Excluded Exons in Exon Skipping Event Using Histone Modifications
por: Chen, Wei, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
An empirical comparison of methods for analyzing correlated data from a discrete choice survey to elicit patient preference for colorectal cancer screening
por: Cheng, Ji, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Bayesian Hierarchical Models Combining Different Study Types and Adjusting for Covariate Imbalances: A Simulation Study to Assess Model Performance
por: McCarron, C. Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2011)