Cargando…

Comprehensive Evaluation and Implementation of Improvement Actions in Butcher Shops

Foodborne pathogens can cause acute and chronic diseases and produce a wide range of symptoms. Since the consumption of ground beef is a risk factor for infections with some bacterial pathogens, we performed a comprehensive evaluation of butcher shops, implemented improvement actions for both butche...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leotta, Gerardo A., Brusa, Victoria, Galli, Lucía, Adriani, Cristian, Linares, Luciano, Etcheverría, Analía, Sanz, Marcelo, Sucari, Adriana, Peral García, Pilar, Signorini, Marcelo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5019392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27618439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162635
_version_ 1782453048016109568
author Leotta, Gerardo A.
Brusa, Victoria
Galli, Lucía
Adriani, Cristian
Linares, Luciano
Etcheverría, Analía
Sanz, Marcelo
Sucari, Adriana
Peral García, Pilar
Signorini, Marcelo
author_facet Leotta, Gerardo A.
Brusa, Victoria
Galli, Lucía
Adriani, Cristian
Linares, Luciano
Etcheverría, Analía
Sanz, Marcelo
Sucari, Adriana
Peral García, Pilar
Signorini, Marcelo
author_sort Leotta, Gerardo A.
collection PubMed
description Foodborne pathogens can cause acute and chronic diseases and produce a wide range of symptoms. Since the consumption of ground beef is a risk factor for infections with some bacterial pathogens, we performed a comprehensive evaluation of butcher shops, implemented improvement actions for both butcher shops and consumers, and verified the impact of those actions implemented. A comprehensive evaluation was made and risk was quantified on a 1–100 scale as high-risk (1–40), moderate-risk (41–70) or low-risk (71–100). A total of 172 raw ground beef and 672 environmental samples were collected from 86 butcher shops during the evaluation (2010–2011) and verification (2013) stages of the study. Ground beef samples were analyzed for mesophilic aerobic organisms, Escherichia coli and coagulase-positive Staphylococcus aureus enumeration. Salmonella spp., E. coli O157:H7, non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC), and Listeria monocytogenes were detected and isolated from all samples. Risk quantification resulted in 43 (50.0%) high-risk, 34 (39.5%) moderate-risk, and nine (10.5%) low-risk butcher shops. Training sessions for 498 handlers and 4,506 consumers were held. Re-evaluation by risk quantification and microbiological analyses resulted in 19 (22.1%) high-risk, 42 (48.8%) moderate-risk and 25 (29.1%) low-risk butcher shops. The count of indicator microorganisms decreased with respect to the 2010–2011 period. After the implementation of improvement actions, the presence of L. monocytogenes, E. coli O157:H7 and stx genes in ground beef decreased. Salmonella spp. was isolated from 10 (11.6%) ground beef samples, without detecting statistically significant differences between both study periods (evaluation and verification). The percentage of pathogens in environmental samples was reduced in the verification period (Salmonella spp., 1.5%; L. monocytogenes, 10.7%; E. coli O157:H7, 0.6%; non-O157 STEC, 6.8%). Risk quantification was useful to identify those relevant facts in butcher shops. The reduction of contamination in ground beef and the environment was possible after training handlers based on the problems identified in their own butcher shops. Our results confirm the feasibility of implementing a comprehensive risk management program in butcher shops, and the importance of information campaigns targeting consumers. Further collaborative efforts would be necessary to improve foodstuffs safety at retail level and at home.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5019392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50193922016-09-27 Comprehensive Evaluation and Implementation of Improvement Actions in Butcher Shops Leotta, Gerardo A. Brusa, Victoria Galli, Lucía Adriani, Cristian Linares, Luciano Etcheverría, Analía Sanz, Marcelo Sucari, Adriana Peral García, Pilar Signorini, Marcelo PLoS One Research Article Foodborne pathogens can cause acute and chronic diseases and produce a wide range of symptoms. Since the consumption of ground beef is a risk factor for infections with some bacterial pathogens, we performed a comprehensive evaluation of butcher shops, implemented improvement actions for both butcher shops and consumers, and verified the impact of those actions implemented. A comprehensive evaluation was made and risk was quantified on a 1–100 scale as high-risk (1–40), moderate-risk (41–70) or low-risk (71–100). A total of 172 raw ground beef and 672 environmental samples were collected from 86 butcher shops during the evaluation (2010–2011) and verification (2013) stages of the study. Ground beef samples were analyzed for mesophilic aerobic organisms, Escherichia coli and coagulase-positive Staphylococcus aureus enumeration. Salmonella spp., E. coli O157:H7, non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC), and Listeria monocytogenes were detected and isolated from all samples. Risk quantification resulted in 43 (50.0%) high-risk, 34 (39.5%) moderate-risk, and nine (10.5%) low-risk butcher shops. Training sessions for 498 handlers and 4,506 consumers were held. Re-evaluation by risk quantification and microbiological analyses resulted in 19 (22.1%) high-risk, 42 (48.8%) moderate-risk and 25 (29.1%) low-risk butcher shops. The count of indicator microorganisms decreased with respect to the 2010–2011 period. After the implementation of improvement actions, the presence of L. monocytogenes, E. coli O157:H7 and stx genes in ground beef decreased. Salmonella spp. was isolated from 10 (11.6%) ground beef samples, without detecting statistically significant differences between both study periods (evaluation and verification). The percentage of pathogens in environmental samples was reduced in the verification period (Salmonella spp., 1.5%; L. monocytogenes, 10.7%; E. coli O157:H7, 0.6%; non-O157 STEC, 6.8%). Risk quantification was useful to identify those relevant facts in butcher shops. The reduction of contamination in ground beef and the environment was possible after training handlers based on the problems identified in their own butcher shops. Our results confirm the feasibility of implementing a comprehensive risk management program in butcher shops, and the importance of information campaigns targeting consumers. Further collaborative efforts would be necessary to improve foodstuffs safety at retail level and at home. Public Library of Science 2016-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5019392/ /pubmed/27618439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162635 Text en © 2016 Leotta et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Leotta, Gerardo A.
Brusa, Victoria
Galli, Lucía
Adriani, Cristian
Linares, Luciano
Etcheverría, Analía
Sanz, Marcelo
Sucari, Adriana
Peral García, Pilar
Signorini, Marcelo
Comprehensive Evaluation and Implementation of Improvement Actions in Butcher Shops
title Comprehensive Evaluation and Implementation of Improvement Actions in Butcher Shops
title_full Comprehensive Evaluation and Implementation of Improvement Actions in Butcher Shops
title_fullStr Comprehensive Evaluation and Implementation of Improvement Actions in Butcher Shops
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive Evaluation and Implementation of Improvement Actions in Butcher Shops
title_short Comprehensive Evaluation and Implementation of Improvement Actions in Butcher Shops
title_sort comprehensive evaluation and implementation of improvement actions in butcher shops
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5019392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27618439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162635
work_keys_str_mv AT leottagerardoa comprehensiveevaluationandimplementationofimprovementactionsinbutchershops
AT brusavictoria comprehensiveevaluationandimplementationofimprovementactionsinbutchershops
AT gallilucia comprehensiveevaluationandimplementationofimprovementactionsinbutchershops
AT adrianicristian comprehensiveevaluationandimplementationofimprovementactionsinbutchershops
AT linaresluciano comprehensiveevaluationandimplementationofimprovementactionsinbutchershops
AT etcheverriaanalia comprehensiveevaluationandimplementationofimprovementactionsinbutchershops
AT sanzmarcelo comprehensiveevaluationandimplementationofimprovementactionsinbutchershops
AT sucariadriana comprehensiveevaluationandimplementationofimprovementactionsinbutchershops
AT peralgarciapilar comprehensiveevaluationandimplementationofimprovementactionsinbutchershops
AT signorinimarcelo comprehensiveevaluationandimplementationofimprovementactionsinbutchershops