Cargando…

The structural basis of the dominant negative phenotype of the Gα(i1)β(1)γ(2) G203A/A326S heterotrimer

AIM: Dominant negative mutant G proteins have provided critical insight into the mechanisms of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling, but the mechanisms underlying the dominant negative characteristics are not completely understood. The aim of this study was to determine the structure of the d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Ping, Jia, Ming-zhu, Zhou, X Edward, De Waal, Parker W, Dickson, Bradley M, Liu, Bo, Hou, Li, Yin, Yan-ting, Kang, Yan-yong, Shi, Yi, Melcher, Karsten, Xu, H Eric, Jiang, Yi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5022103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27498775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/aps.2016.69
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: Dominant negative mutant G proteins have provided critical insight into the mechanisms of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling, but the mechanisms underlying the dominant negative characteristics are not completely understood. The aim of this study was to determine the structure of the dominant negative Gα(i1)β(1)γ(2) G203A/A326S complex (Gi-DN) and to reveal the structural basis of the mutation-induced phenotype of Gα(i1)β(1)γ(2). METHODS: The three subunits of the Gi-DN complex were co-expressed with a baculovirus expression system. The Gi-DN heterotrimer was purified, and the structure of its complex with GDP was determined through X-ray crystallography. RESULTS: The Gi-DN heterotrimer structure revealed a dual mechanism underlying the dominant negative characteristics. The mutations weakened the hydrogen bonding network between GDP/GTP and the binding pocket residues, and increased the interactions in the Gα-Gβγ interface. Concomitantly, the Gi-DN heterotrimer adopted a conformation, in which the C-terminus of Gα(i) and the N-termini of both the Gβ and Gγ subunits were more similar to the GPCR-bound state compared with the wild type complex. From these structural observations, two additional mutations (T48F and D272F) were designed that completely abolish the GDP binding of the Gi-DN heterotrimer. CONCLUSION: Overall, the results suggest that the mutations impede guanine nucleotide binding and Gα-Gβγ protein dissociation and favor the formation of the G protein/GPCR complex, thus blocking signal propagation. In addition, the structure provides a rationale for the design of other mutations that cause dominant negative effects in the G protein, as exemplified by the T48F and D272F mutations.