Cargando…

The use of a portable three-lead ECG monitor to detect atrial fibrillation in general practice

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how well an inexpensive portable three-lead ECG monitor PEM identified patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) compared to a normal 12-lead ECG. DESIGN: Cross-sectional method comparison study. SETTING: From April 2014 to February 2015, we included patients coming to the genera...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kristensen, Anne N., Jeyam, Brintha, Riahi, Sam, Jensen, Martin B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5036021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27409151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2016.1207151
_version_ 1782455477597110272
author Kristensen, Anne N.
Jeyam, Brintha
Riahi, Sam
Jensen, Martin B.
author_facet Kristensen, Anne N.
Jeyam, Brintha
Riahi, Sam
Jensen, Martin B.
author_sort Kristensen, Anne N.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how well an inexpensive portable three-lead ECG monitor PEM identified patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) compared to a normal 12-lead ECG. DESIGN: Cross-sectional method comparison study. SETTING: From April 2014 to February 2015, we included patients coming to the general practice clinic “Lægerne Sløjfen”, Aalborg, Denmark for a routine ECG. Patients with severe dementia, mental illness or poor ECG readings were excluded. After oral and written informed consent an ECG and PEM recordings were obtained simultaneously. The PEM recordings were analyzed by two general practitioners (GPs) in training and ECG recordings were evaluated by a senior GP and a cardiologist. Both the PEM and the ECG recordings were analysed blinded. SUBJECTS: Ninety-three patients were included and four were excluded due to poor ECG readings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The sensitivity and specificity of PEM compared to a standard 12-lead ECG. RESULTS: Eighty-nine of the 93 (95.7%) patients had ECGs of a satisfactory technical quality and were included in the study. The sensitivity of diagnosing AF by PEM recordings was 86.7% and the specificity was 98.7% when compared to a 12-lead ECG. According to the cardiologist, the misclassification of three PEM recordings were due to interpretation errors and not related to the PEM recording per se. CONCLUSIONS: The inexpensive portable PEM device recording diagnosed AF with a high sensitivity and specificity. KEY POINTS: Simple ECG monitors could be useful to identify atrial fibrillation and thereby lead to a better prevention of stroke. The PEM device was easy to use and 95.7% of the recordings were technically acceptable for detecting atrial fibrillation. The PEM device has a high sensitivity and specificity in detecting atrial fibrillation compared to a standard 12-lead ECG. Further studies should evaluate the clinical usefulness of the PEM device, e.g. to detect intermittent atrial fibrillation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5036021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50360212016-10-04 The use of a portable three-lead ECG monitor to detect atrial fibrillation in general practice Kristensen, Anne N. Jeyam, Brintha Riahi, Sam Jensen, Martin B. Scand J Prim Health Care Research Articles OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how well an inexpensive portable three-lead ECG monitor PEM identified patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) compared to a normal 12-lead ECG. DESIGN: Cross-sectional method comparison study. SETTING: From April 2014 to February 2015, we included patients coming to the general practice clinic “Lægerne Sløjfen”, Aalborg, Denmark for a routine ECG. Patients with severe dementia, mental illness or poor ECG readings were excluded. After oral and written informed consent an ECG and PEM recordings were obtained simultaneously. The PEM recordings were analyzed by two general practitioners (GPs) in training and ECG recordings were evaluated by a senior GP and a cardiologist. Both the PEM and the ECG recordings were analysed blinded. SUBJECTS: Ninety-three patients were included and four were excluded due to poor ECG readings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The sensitivity and specificity of PEM compared to a standard 12-lead ECG. RESULTS: Eighty-nine of the 93 (95.7%) patients had ECGs of a satisfactory technical quality and were included in the study. The sensitivity of diagnosing AF by PEM recordings was 86.7% and the specificity was 98.7% when compared to a 12-lead ECG. According to the cardiologist, the misclassification of three PEM recordings were due to interpretation errors and not related to the PEM recording per se. CONCLUSIONS: The inexpensive portable PEM device recording diagnosed AF with a high sensitivity and specificity. KEY POINTS: Simple ECG monitors could be useful to identify atrial fibrillation and thereby lead to a better prevention of stroke. The PEM device was easy to use and 95.7% of the recordings were technically acceptable for detecting atrial fibrillation. The PEM device has a high sensitivity and specificity in detecting atrial fibrillation compared to a standard 12-lead ECG. Further studies should evaluate the clinical usefulness of the PEM device, e.g. to detect intermittent atrial fibrillation. Taylor & Francis 2016-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5036021/ /pubmed/27409151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2016.1207151 Text en © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Kristensen, Anne N.
Jeyam, Brintha
Riahi, Sam
Jensen, Martin B.
The use of a portable three-lead ECG monitor to detect atrial fibrillation in general practice
title The use of a portable three-lead ECG monitor to detect atrial fibrillation in general practice
title_full The use of a portable three-lead ECG monitor to detect atrial fibrillation in general practice
title_fullStr The use of a portable three-lead ECG monitor to detect atrial fibrillation in general practice
title_full_unstemmed The use of a portable three-lead ECG monitor to detect atrial fibrillation in general practice
title_short The use of a portable three-lead ECG monitor to detect atrial fibrillation in general practice
title_sort use of a portable three-lead ecg monitor to detect atrial fibrillation in general practice
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5036021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27409151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2016.1207151
work_keys_str_mv AT kristensenannen theuseofaportablethreeleadecgmonitortodetectatrialfibrillationingeneralpractice
AT jeyambrintha theuseofaportablethreeleadecgmonitortodetectatrialfibrillationingeneralpractice
AT riahisam theuseofaportablethreeleadecgmonitortodetectatrialfibrillationingeneralpractice
AT jensenmartinb theuseofaportablethreeleadecgmonitortodetectatrialfibrillationingeneralpractice
AT kristensenannen useofaportablethreeleadecgmonitortodetectatrialfibrillationingeneralpractice
AT jeyambrintha useofaportablethreeleadecgmonitortodetectatrialfibrillationingeneralpractice
AT riahisam useofaportablethreeleadecgmonitortodetectatrialfibrillationingeneralpractice
AT jensenmartinb useofaportablethreeleadecgmonitortodetectatrialfibrillationingeneralpractice