Cargando…
Experimental factors affecting the robustness of DNA methylation analysis
Diverging methylation frequencies are often reported for the same locus in the same disease, underscoring the need for limiting technical variability in DNA methylation analyses. We have investigated seven likely sources of variability at different steps of bisulfite PCR-based DNA methylation analys...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5037394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27671843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep33936 |
_version_ | 1782455729002643456 |
---|---|
author | Pharo, Heidi D. Honne, Hilde Vedeld, Hege M. Dahl, Christina Andresen, Kim Liestøl, Knut Jeanmougin, Marine Guldberg, Per Lind, Guro E. |
author_facet | Pharo, Heidi D. Honne, Hilde Vedeld, Hege M. Dahl, Christina Andresen, Kim Liestøl, Knut Jeanmougin, Marine Guldberg, Per Lind, Guro E. |
author_sort | Pharo, Heidi D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Diverging methylation frequencies are often reported for the same locus in the same disease, underscoring the need for limiting technical variability in DNA methylation analyses. We have investigated seven likely sources of variability at different steps of bisulfite PCR-based DNA methylation analyses using a fully automated quantitative methylation-specific PCR setup of six gene promoters across 20 colon cancer cell lines. Based on >15,000 individual PCRs, all tested parameters affected the normalized percent of methylated reference (PMR) differences, with a fourfold varying magnitude. Additionally, large variations were observed across the six genes analyzed. The highest variation was seen using single-copy genes as reference for normalization, followed by different amounts of template in the PCR, different amounts of DNA in the bisulfite reaction, and storage of bisulfite converted samples. Finally, when a highly standardized pipeline was repeated, the difference in PMR value for the same assay in the same cell line was on average limited to five (on a 0–100 scale). In conclusion, a standardized pipeline is essential for consistent methylation results, where parameters are kept constant for all samples. Nevertheless, a certain level of variation in methylation values must be expected, underscoring the need for careful interpretation of data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5037394 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50373942016-09-30 Experimental factors affecting the robustness of DNA methylation analysis Pharo, Heidi D. Honne, Hilde Vedeld, Hege M. Dahl, Christina Andresen, Kim Liestøl, Knut Jeanmougin, Marine Guldberg, Per Lind, Guro E. Sci Rep Article Diverging methylation frequencies are often reported for the same locus in the same disease, underscoring the need for limiting technical variability in DNA methylation analyses. We have investigated seven likely sources of variability at different steps of bisulfite PCR-based DNA methylation analyses using a fully automated quantitative methylation-specific PCR setup of six gene promoters across 20 colon cancer cell lines. Based on >15,000 individual PCRs, all tested parameters affected the normalized percent of methylated reference (PMR) differences, with a fourfold varying magnitude. Additionally, large variations were observed across the six genes analyzed. The highest variation was seen using single-copy genes as reference for normalization, followed by different amounts of template in the PCR, different amounts of DNA in the bisulfite reaction, and storage of bisulfite converted samples. Finally, when a highly standardized pipeline was repeated, the difference in PMR value for the same assay in the same cell line was on average limited to five (on a 0–100 scale). In conclusion, a standardized pipeline is essential for consistent methylation results, where parameters are kept constant for all samples. Nevertheless, a certain level of variation in methylation values must be expected, underscoring the need for careful interpretation of data. Nature Publishing Group 2016-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5037394/ /pubmed/27671843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep33936 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Pharo, Heidi D. Honne, Hilde Vedeld, Hege M. Dahl, Christina Andresen, Kim Liestøl, Knut Jeanmougin, Marine Guldberg, Per Lind, Guro E. Experimental factors affecting the robustness of DNA methylation analysis |
title | Experimental factors affecting the robustness of DNA methylation analysis |
title_full | Experimental factors affecting the robustness of DNA methylation analysis |
title_fullStr | Experimental factors affecting the robustness of DNA methylation analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Experimental factors affecting the robustness of DNA methylation analysis |
title_short | Experimental factors affecting the robustness of DNA methylation analysis |
title_sort | experimental factors affecting the robustness of dna methylation analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5037394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27671843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep33936 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pharoheidid experimentalfactorsaffectingtherobustnessofdnamethylationanalysis AT honnehilde experimentalfactorsaffectingtherobustnessofdnamethylationanalysis AT vedeldhegem experimentalfactorsaffectingtherobustnessofdnamethylationanalysis AT dahlchristina experimentalfactorsaffectingtherobustnessofdnamethylationanalysis AT andresenkim experimentalfactorsaffectingtherobustnessofdnamethylationanalysis AT liestølknut experimentalfactorsaffectingtherobustnessofdnamethylationanalysis AT jeanmouginmarine experimentalfactorsaffectingtherobustnessofdnamethylationanalysis AT guldbergper experimentalfactorsaffectingtherobustnessofdnamethylationanalysis AT lindguroe experimentalfactorsaffectingtherobustnessofdnamethylationanalysis |