Cargando…

Student Response to Remote-Online Case-Based Learning: A Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND: Case-based learning (CBL) typically involves face-to-face interaction in small collaborative groups with a focus on self-directed study. To our knowledge, no published studies report an evaluation of Web conferencing in CBL. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to explore student...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nicklen, Peter, Keating, Jennifer L, Maloney, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5041370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27731852
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mededu.5025
_version_ 1782456398058094592
author Nicklen, Peter
Keating, Jennifer L
Maloney, Stephen
author_facet Nicklen, Peter
Keating, Jennifer L
Maloney, Stephen
author_sort Nicklen, Peter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Case-based learning (CBL) typically involves face-to-face interaction in small collaborative groups with a focus on self-directed study. To our knowledge, no published studies report an evaluation of Web conferencing in CBL. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to explore student perceptions and attitudes in response to a remote-online case-based learning (RO-CBL) experience. METHODS: This study took place over a 2-week period in 2013 at Monash University, Victoria, Australia. A third year cohort (n=73) of physiotherapy students was invited to participate. Students were required to participate in 2 training sessions, followed by RO-CBL across 2 sessions. The primary outcome of interest was the student feedback on the quality of the learning experience during RO-CBL participation. This was explored with a focus group and a survey. RESULTS: Most students (68/73) completed the postintervention survey (nonparticipation rate 8%). RO-CBL was generally well received by participants, with 59% (40/68) of participates stating that they’d like RO-CBL to be used in the future and 78% (53/68) of participants believing they could meet the CBL’s learning objectives via RO-CBL. The 4 key themes relevant to student response to RO-CBL that emerged from the focus groups and open-ended questions on the postintervention survey were how RO-CBL compared to expectations, key benefits of RO-CBL including flexibility and time and cost savings, communication challenges in the online environment compared to face-to-face, and implications of moving to an online platform. CONCLUSIONS: Web conferencing may be a suitable medium for students to participate in CBL. Participants were satisfied with the learning activity and felt they could meet the CBL’s learning objectives. Further study should evaluate Web conferencing CBL across an entire semester in regard to student satisfaction, perceived depth of learning, and learning outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5041370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher JMIR Publications Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50413702016-10-05 Student Response to Remote-Online Case-Based Learning: A Qualitative Study Nicklen, Peter Keating, Jennifer L Maloney, Stephen JMIR Med Educ Original Paper BACKGROUND: Case-based learning (CBL) typically involves face-to-face interaction in small collaborative groups with a focus on self-directed study. To our knowledge, no published studies report an evaluation of Web conferencing in CBL. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to explore student perceptions and attitudes in response to a remote-online case-based learning (RO-CBL) experience. METHODS: This study took place over a 2-week period in 2013 at Monash University, Victoria, Australia. A third year cohort (n=73) of physiotherapy students was invited to participate. Students were required to participate in 2 training sessions, followed by RO-CBL across 2 sessions. The primary outcome of interest was the student feedback on the quality of the learning experience during RO-CBL participation. This was explored with a focus group and a survey. RESULTS: Most students (68/73) completed the postintervention survey (nonparticipation rate 8%). RO-CBL was generally well received by participants, with 59% (40/68) of participates stating that they’d like RO-CBL to be used in the future and 78% (53/68) of participants believing they could meet the CBL’s learning objectives via RO-CBL. The 4 key themes relevant to student response to RO-CBL that emerged from the focus groups and open-ended questions on the postintervention survey were how RO-CBL compared to expectations, key benefits of RO-CBL including flexibility and time and cost savings, communication challenges in the online environment compared to face-to-face, and implications of moving to an online platform. CONCLUSIONS: Web conferencing may be a suitable medium for students to participate in CBL. Participants were satisfied with the learning activity and felt they could meet the CBL’s learning objectives. Further study should evaluate Web conferencing CBL across an entire semester in regard to student satisfaction, perceived depth of learning, and learning outcomes. JMIR Publications Inc. 2016-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5041370/ /pubmed/27731852 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mededu.5025 Text en ©Peter Nicklen, Jennifer L Keating, Stephen Maloney. Originally published in JMIR Medical Education (http://mededu.jmir.org), 22.03.2016. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Medical Education, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mededu.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Nicklen, Peter
Keating, Jennifer L
Maloney, Stephen
Student Response to Remote-Online Case-Based Learning: A Qualitative Study
title Student Response to Remote-Online Case-Based Learning: A Qualitative Study
title_full Student Response to Remote-Online Case-Based Learning: A Qualitative Study
title_fullStr Student Response to Remote-Online Case-Based Learning: A Qualitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Student Response to Remote-Online Case-Based Learning: A Qualitative Study
title_short Student Response to Remote-Online Case-Based Learning: A Qualitative Study
title_sort student response to remote-online case-based learning: a qualitative study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5041370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27731852
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mededu.5025
work_keys_str_mv AT nicklenpeter studentresponsetoremoteonlinecasebasedlearningaqualitativestudy
AT keatingjenniferl studentresponsetoremoteonlinecasebasedlearningaqualitativestudy
AT maloneystephen studentresponsetoremoteonlinecasebasedlearningaqualitativestudy