Cargando…

Different modes of variation for each BG lineage suggest different functions

Mammalian butyrophilins have various important functions, one for lipid binding but others as ligands for co-inhibition of αβ T cells or for stimulation of γδ T cells in the immune system. The chicken BG homologues are dimers, with extracellular immunoglobulin variable (V) domains joined by cysteine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chattaway, John, Ramirez-Valdez, R. Andrei, Chappell, Paul E., Caesar, Joseph J. E., Lea, Susan M., Kaufman, Jim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5043582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27628321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsob.160188
_version_ 1782456780384632832
author Chattaway, John
Ramirez-Valdez, R. Andrei
Chappell, Paul E.
Caesar, Joseph J. E.
Lea, Susan M.
Kaufman, Jim
author_facet Chattaway, John
Ramirez-Valdez, R. Andrei
Chappell, Paul E.
Caesar, Joseph J. E.
Lea, Susan M.
Kaufman, Jim
author_sort Chattaway, John
collection PubMed
description Mammalian butyrophilins have various important functions, one for lipid binding but others as ligands for co-inhibition of αβ T cells or for stimulation of γδ T cells in the immune system. The chicken BG homologues are dimers, with extracellular immunoglobulin variable (V) domains joined by cysteines in the loop equivalent to complementarity-determining region 1 (CDR1). BG genes are found in three genomic locations: BG0 on chromosome 2, BG1 in the classical MHC (the BF-BL region) and many BG genes in the BG region just outside the MHC. Here, we show that BG0 is virtually monomorphic, suggesting housekeeping function(s) consonant with the ubiquitous tissue distribution. BG1 has allelic polymorphism but minimal sequence diversity, with the few polymorphic residues at the interface of the two V domains, suggesting that BG1 is recognized by receptors in a conserved fashion. Any phenotypic variation should be due to the intracellular region, with differential exon usage between alleles. BG genes in the BG region can generate diversity by exchange of sequence cassettes located in loops equivalent to CDR1 and CDR2, consonant with recognition of many ligands or antigens for immune defence. Unlike the mammalian butyrophilins, there are at least three modes by which BG genes evolve.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5043582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50435822016-10-05 Different modes of variation for each BG lineage suggest different functions Chattaway, John Ramirez-Valdez, R. Andrei Chappell, Paul E. Caesar, Joseph J. E. Lea, Susan M. Kaufman, Jim Open Biol Research Mammalian butyrophilins have various important functions, one for lipid binding but others as ligands for co-inhibition of αβ T cells or for stimulation of γδ T cells in the immune system. The chicken BG homologues are dimers, with extracellular immunoglobulin variable (V) domains joined by cysteines in the loop equivalent to complementarity-determining region 1 (CDR1). BG genes are found in three genomic locations: BG0 on chromosome 2, BG1 in the classical MHC (the BF-BL region) and many BG genes in the BG region just outside the MHC. Here, we show that BG0 is virtually monomorphic, suggesting housekeeping function(s) consonant with the ubiquitous tissue distribution. BG1 has allelic polymorphism but minimal sequence diversity, with the few polymorphic residues at the interface of the two V domains, suggesting that BG1 is recognized by receptors in a conserved fashion. Any phenotypic variation should be due to the intracellular region, with differential exon usage between alleles. BG genes in the BG region can generate diversity by exchange of sequence cassettes located in loops equivalent to CDR1 and CDR2, consonant with recognition of many ligands or antigens for immune defence. Unlike the mammalian butyrophilins, there are at least three modes by which BG genes evolve. The Royal Society 2016-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5043582/ /pubmed/27628321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsob.160188 Text en © 2016 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research
Chattaway, John
Ramirez-Valdez, R. Andrei
Chappell, Paul E.
Caesar, Joseph J. E.
Lea, Susan M.
Kaufman, Jim
Different modes of variation for each BG lineage suggest different functions
title Different modes of variation for each BG lineage suggest different functions
title_full Different modes of variation for each BG lineage suggest different functions
title_fullStr Different modes of variation for each BG lineage suggest different functions
title_full_unstemmed Different modes of variation for each BG lineage suggest different functions
title_short Different modes of variation for each BG lineage suggest different functions
title_sort different modes of variation for each bg lineage suggest different functions
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5043582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27628321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsob.160188
work_keys_str_mv AT chattawayjohn differentmodesofvariationforeachbglineagesuggestdifferentfunctions
AT ramirezvaldezrandrei differentmodesofvariationforeachbglineagesuggestdifferentfunctions
AT chappellpaule differentmodesofvariationforeachbglineagesuggestdifferentfunctions
AT caesarjosephje differentmodesofvariationforeachbglineagesuggestdifferentfunctions
AT leasusanm differentmodesofvariationforeachbglineagesuggestdifferentfunctions
AT kaufmanjim differentmodesofvariationforeachbglineagesuggestdifferentfunctions