Cargando…
Efficacy and effectiveness trials have different goals, use different tools, and generate different messages
The discussion about the optimal design of clinical trials reflects the perspectives of theory-based scientists and practice-based clinicians. Scientists compare the theory with published results. They observe a continuum from explanatory to pragmatic trials. Clinicians compare the problem they want...
Autores principales: | Porzsolt, Franz, Rocha, Natália Galito, Toledo-Arruda, Alessandra C, Thomaz, Tania G, Moraes, Cristiane, Bessa-Guerra, Thais R, Leão, Mauricio, Migowski, Arn, Araujo da Silva, André R, Weiss, Christel |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5045025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27774032 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/POR.S89946 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Efficacy and effectiveness trials have different goals, use different tools, and generate different messages [Corrigendum]
Publicado: (2016) -
The fading of reported effectiveness. A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
por: Gehr, Bernhard T, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Form follows function: pragmatic controlled trials (PCTs) have to answer different questions and require different designs than randomized controlled trials (RCTs)
por: Porzsolt, Franz, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Comparison of International Guidelines on the Accompanying Therapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: Reasons for the Differences
por: Bauer, Katrin, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Prognosis Determinants after Cardioverter-Defibrillators Implantation
in Brazil
por: Migowski, Arn, et al.
Publicado: (2017)