Cargando…

Active inference and robot control: a case study

Active inference is a general framework for perception and action that is gaining prominence in computational and systems neuroscience but is less known outside these fields. Here, we discuss a proof-of-principle implementation of the active inference scheme for the control or the 7-DoF arm of a (si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pio-Lopez, Léo, Nizard, Ange, Friston, Karl, Pezzulo, Giovanni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5046960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27683002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2016.0616
_version_ 1782457377176420352
author Pio-Lopez, Léo
Nizard, Ange
Friston, Karl
Pezzulo, Giovanni
author_facet Pio-Lopez, Léo
Nizard, Ange
Friston, Karl
Pezzulo, Giovanni
author_sort Pio-Lopez, Léo
collection PubMed
description Active inference is a general framework for perception and action that is gaining prominence in computational and systems neuroscience but is less known outside these fields. Here, we discuss a proof-of-principle implementation of the active inference scheme for the control or the 7-DoF arm of a (simulated) PR2 robot. By manipulating visual and proprioceptive noise levels, we show under which conditions robot control under the active inference scheme is accurate. Besides accurate control, our analysis of the internal system dynamics (e.g. the dynamics of the hidden states that are inferred during the inference) sheds light on key aspects of the framework such as the quintessentially multimodal nature of control and the differential roles of proprioception and vision. In the discussion, we consider the potential importance of being able to implement active inference in robots. In particular, we briefly review the opportunities for modelling psychophysiological phenomena such as sensory attenuation and related failures of gain control, of the sort seen in Parkinson's disease. We also consider the fundamental difference between active inference and optimal control formulations, showing that in the former the heavy lifting shifts from solving a dynamical inverse problem to creating deep forward or generative models with dynamics, whose attracting sets prescribe desired behaviours.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5046960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50469602016-10-06 Active inference and robot control: a case study Pio-Lopez, Léo Nizard, Ange Friston, Karl Pezzulo, Giovanni J R Soc Interface Life Sciences–Engineering interface Active inference is a general framework for perception and action that is gaining prominence in computational and systems neuroscience but is less known outside these fields. Here, we discuss a proof-of-principle implementation of the active inference scheme for the control or the 7-DoF arm of a (simulated) PR2 robot. By manipulating visual and proprioceptive noise levels, we show under which conditions robot control under the active inference scheme is accurate. Besides accurate control, our analysis of the internal system dynamics (e.g. the dynamics of the hidden states that are inferred during the inference) sheds light on key aspects of the framework such as the quintessentially multimodal nature of control and the differential roles of proprioception and vision. In the discussion, we consider the potential importance of being able to implement active inference in robots. In particular, we briefly review the opportunities for modelling psychophysiological phenomena such as sensory attenuation and related failures of gain control, of the sort seen in Parkinson's disease. We also consider the fundamental difference between active inference and optimal control formulations, showing that in the former the heavy lifting shifts from solving a dynamical inverse problem to creating deep forward or generative models with dynamics, whose attracting sets prescribe desired behaviours. The Royal Society 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5046960/ /pubmed/27683002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2016.0616 Text en © 2016 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Life Sciences–Engineering interface
Pio-Lopez, Léo
Nizard, Ange
Friston, Karl
Pezzulo, Giovanni
Active inference and robot control: a case study
title Active inference and robot control: a case study
title_full Active inference and robot control: a case study
title_fullStr Active inference and robot control: a case study
title_full_unstemmed Active inference and robot control: a case study
title_short Active inference and robot control: a case study
title_sort active inference and robot control: a case study
topic Life Sciences–Engineering interface
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5046960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27683002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2016.0616
work_keys_str_mv AT piolopezleo activeinferenceandrobotcontrolacasestudy
AT nizardange activeinferenceandrobotcontrolacasestudy
AT fristonkarl activeinferenceandrobotcontrolacasestudy
AT pezzulogiovanni activeinferenceandrobotcontrolacasestudy