Cargando…
Active inference and robot control: a case study
Active inference is a general framework for perception and action that is gaining prominence in computational and systems neuroscience but is less known outside these fields. Here, we discuss a proof-of-principle implementation of the active inference scheme for the control or the 7-DoF arm of a (si...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5046960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27683002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2016.0616 |
_version_ | 1782457377176420352 |
---|---|
author | Pio-Lopez, Léo Nizard, Ange Friston, Karl Pezzulo, Giovanni |
author_facet | Pio-Lopez, Léo Nizard, Ange Friston, Karl Pezzulo, Giovanni |
author_sort | Pio-Lopez, Léo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Active inference is a general framework for perception and action that is gaining prominence in computational and systems neuroscience but is less known outside these fields. Here, we discuss a proof-of-principle implementation of the active inference scheme for the control or the 7-DoF arm of a (simulated) PR2 robot. By manipulating visual and proprioceptive noise levels, we show under which conditions robot control under the active inference scheme is accurate. Besides accurate control, our analysis of the internal system dynamics (e.g. the dynamics of the hidden states that are inferred during the inference) sheds light on key aspects of the framework such as the quintessentially multimodal nature of control and the differential roles of proprioception and vision. In the discussion, we consider the potential importance of being able to implement active inference in robots. In particular, we briefly review the opportunities for modelling psychophysiological phenomena such as sensory attenuation and related failures of gain control, of the sort seen in Parkinson's disease. We also consider the fundamental difference between active inference and optimal control formulations, showing that in the former the heavy lifting shifts from solving a dynamical inverse problem to creating deep forward or generative models with dynamics, whose attracting sets prescribe desired behaviours. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5046960 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50469602016-10-06 Active inference and robot control: a case study Pio-Lopez, Léo Nizard, Ange Friston, Karl Pezzulo, Giovanni J R Soc Interface Life Sciences–Engineering interface Active inference is a general framework for perception and action that is gaining prominence in computational and systems neuroscience but is less known outside these fields. Here, we discuss a proof-of-principle implementation of the active inference scheme for the control or the 7-DoF arm of a (simulated) PR2 robot. By manipulating visual and proprioceptive noise levels, we show under which conditions robot control under the active inference scheme is accurate. Besides accurate control, our analysis of the internal system dynamics (e.g. the dynamics of the hidden states that are inferred during the inference) sheds light on key aspects of the framework such as the quintessentially multimodal nature of control and the differential roles of proprioception and vision. In the discussion, we consider the potential importance of being able to implement active inference in robots. In particular, we briefly review the opportunities for modelling psychophysiological phenomena such as sensory attenuation and related failures of gain control, of the sort seen in Parkinson's disease. We also consider the fundamental difference between active inference and optimal control formulations, showing that in the former the heavy lifting shifts from solving a dynamical inverse problem to creating deep forward or generative models with dynamics, whose attracting sets prescribe desired behaviours. The Royal Society 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5046960/ /pubmed/27683002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2016.0616 Text en © 2016 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Life Sciences–Engineering interface Pio-Lopez, Léo Nizard, Ange Friston, Karl Pezzulo, Giovanni Active inference and robot control: a case study |
title | Active inference and robot control: a case study |
title_full | Active inference and robot control: a case study |
title_fullStr | Active inference and robot control: a case study |
title_full_unstemmed | Active inference and robot control: a case study |
title_short | Active inference and robot control: a case study |
title_sort | active inference and robot control: a case study |
topic | Life Sciences–Engineering interface |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5046960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27683002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2016.0616 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT piolopezleo activeinferenceandrobotcontrolacasestudy AT nizardange activeinferenceandrobotcontrolacasestudy AT fristonkarl activeinferenceandrobotcontrolacasestudy AT pezzulogiovanni activeinferenceandrobotcontrolacasestudy |